frequently asked questionscases & resources  
Cases & resources

Secondary-effects doctrine

Supreme Court
City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. 535 U.S. 425 (2002)
City of Erie v. Pap’s A.M., 120 S.Ct. 1382 (2000)
Barnes v. Glen Theatre, 501 U.S. 560 (1991)
Boos v. Berry, 485 U.S. 312 (1988)
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, 475 U.S. 41 (1986)
Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 (1976)

Voyeur Dorm, L.C. v. City of Tampa, 265 F.3d 1232 (11th Cir. 2001); cert. denied by U.S. Supreme Court in City of Tampa v. Voyeur Dorm (01-902) Feb. 25, 2002
Flanigan’s Enterprises, Inc. v. Fulton County, No. 00-11152, (11th Cir.) (Feb. 20, 2001)
Long v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, 121 F.Supp.2d 621 (W.D. Kent. 2000)

Smolla, Rodney A., Smolla and Nimmer on Freedom of Speech, New York: West Group, 1996

Hudson, David L. Jr., Adult Entertainment and the Seconday-effects Doctrine
Hudson, David L. Jr., “The Secondary Effects Doctrine: ‘The Evisceration of First Amendment Freedoms’” 37 Washburn L.J. 55 (1997)
Ortiz, Francesca, “Zoning the The Voyeur Dorm: Regulating Home-Based Voyeur Web Sites Through Land-Use Laws,” in First Amendment Law Handbook 2001-2002 (ed. James L. Swanson)
Paul, Bryant; Linz, Daniel; and Shafer, Bradley, “Government Regulation of ‘Adult’ Businesses Through Zoning and Anti-Nudity Ordinances: Debunking the Legal Myth of Negative Secondary Effects,” 6 Comm. L. & Pol’y 355 (2001)

print this   Print
adult entertainment issues >
Pornography & obscenity
Adult bookstores
Nude dancing
Secondary-effects doctrine