First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

'Beer Pong' game's teen-friendly rating criticized

By The Associated Press
07.09.08

HARTFORD, Conn. — Connecticut's attorney general said earlier this week that a video-game rating board's decision to approve a game called "Beer Pong" for children as young as 13 shows the organization needs to take the issue of teen drinking more seriously.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said on July 7 that the Entertainment Software Rating Board made a mistake by clearing the game for young teens and he worried other games in the yet-to-be-released Frat Party Games line would be approved for those same gamers.

"Beer Pong" was designed by Las Vegas-based JV Games Inc. for Nintendo Co.'s popular Wii game system. JV Games Vice President Jag Jaeger informed Blumenthal last month that the company is renaming the game "Pong Toss" and eliminating all references to alcohol, though the company's Web site still promotes the game as "Beer Pong."

"We stopped this game, but that is only a minor victory if it is followed by others," Blumenthal said.

The video game is based on a popular college drinking game where competitors toss a ping-pong ball into the opposing player's cup. If the ball lands in the cup, the opposing player typically has to guzzle beer.

Blumenthal said he believed the game glorified alcohol abuse and binge drinking, but the rating board's president disagreed in a letter to the attorney general last month. Patricia E. Vance defended the original game's rating, saying that alcohol played a minimal role in the game and no one was shown drinking beer.

"Despite being premised on a drinking game, the game's content involves essentially nothing more than tossing pingpong balls into plastic cups," Vance wrote.

Vance said three "specially trained, adult raters" with no ties to the industry reviewed the game and recommended the "T'' rating for people 13 years old and older. There was also a description of the game's content that mentioned the alcohol references.

Blumenthal said the "Beer Pong" name itself belied claims that the role of alcohol in the game was minimal. He added that beer was depicted in the graphics used for the game's title, some of the beer pong tables in the game displayed images of kegs and mugs of beer, and a full bar was in the background.

"The whole basis for the games is heavy alcohol consumption — simply not appropriate for teenagers and deserving more consideration by the Board," Blumenthal wrote.

That's also the opinion of some Virginia school groups, drug-free coalitions and anti-underage-drinking groups. Last month, a coalition newsletter was sent to parents, warning them about the game's teen rating. They also sent a petition to JV Games protesting the game's release.

The Entertainment Software Rating Board is a nonprofit, self-regulating board that independently assigns ratings and provides impartial information about the content of computer and video games for consumers, especially parents. The group is funded by fees charged to companies that volunteer to have their products rated.

Blumenthal sent a second letter to the board on July 7, asking that other video games that contain alcohol content be given an adult rating, for users 18 years old and older.

Jaeger said it would be "ridiculous" to rate his game for adult audiences, and added that Nintendo will not publish such games. He said the game "Grand Theft Auto," known for its violence, was given a lesser "M'' or mature rating.

Jaeger said the video game was never about alcohol, but rather the growing sport that has developed around beer pong. There's even a World Series of Beer Pong that is held in Las Vegas where contestants vie for $50,000 in prize money.

"The game never showed any drinking, it never depicted anyone getting drunk," he said July 7 in a telephone interview from his Las Vegas office. "The thing is, it's becoming a really well-known sport."

Jaeger said he hoped the revised "Pong Toss" would be released at the end of the month. The other games in the "Frat Party Games" line are not yet finalized.


Related

'Grand Theft Auto' makers settle with FTC over sex content

Deal requires companies to properly notify consumers of racy content on future games, not to misrepresent rating or content descriptions. 06.12.06

Fla. judge to decide if 'Bully' game can be sold to minors

Court orders review of unreleased title after lawyer files complaint accusing video game of being 'Columbine simulator,' inappropriate for children. 10.13.06

Federal judge again blasts La. video-game law
State attorney says 'First Amendment is a mighty thing,' admits statute 'was practically unenforceable as written.' 11.30.06

Federal judge strikes down Calif. violent video-game law
Governor, who signed 2005 measure to prohibit sale of violent games to minors, vows to appeal. 08.07.07

8th Circuit: Minn. went too far in restricting video games
Justices agree with lower court that law barring minors from purchasing violent games violates free speech, but opinion shows they aren't entirely happy about it. 03.18.08

Video-game ratings: a tool or a weapon?
By Paul K. McMasters Never does the ponderous machinery of government and commerce rev up so quickly as when the republic is threatened by, uh, sex. 07.31.05

Lack of scientific evidence short-circuits video-game bans
By Douglas Lee Decision striking down Illinois law leaves no doubt about critical weakness in strategy to restrict minors' access to violent games. 12.13.05

Rating & labeling entertainment

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 17:16:55
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links