First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Suburban Chicago student can wear anti-gay T-shirt to school

By The Associated Press,
First Amendment Center Online staff
04.25.08

CHICAGO — A federal appeals court has ruled that a suburban Chicago student should be allowed to wear an anti-gay T-shirt at his high school — a decision the teen's attorneys describe as a victory for First Amendment rights.

In granting a preliminary injunction, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals instructed the district court to order the Neuqua Valley High School to suspend its ban on the "Be Happy, Not Gay" T-shirt while a civil rights lawsuit in the case proceeds.

Neuqua sophomore Alexander Nuxoll was banned from wearing the shirt to school, and he and one-time student Heidi Zamecnik, who wore a similar T-shirt to school in 2006, filed a lawsuit saying their free-speech rights had been violated.

Indian Prairie Unit District 204 later said the students would be allowed to wear a T-shirt that read "Be Happy, Be Straight," but the students refused. Last year, a federal judge ruled against them.

The Alliance Defense Fund, a Christian litigation group representing the students, hailed the 7th Circuit panel’s April 23 order in Nuxoll v. Indian Prairie School Dist. #204

"The court's ruling is a victory for all students seeking to protect their First Amendment rights on a school campus," ADF attorney Nate Kellum said yesterday. "Public school officials cannot censor a message expressing one viewpoint on homosexual behavior and then at the same time allow messages that express another viewpoint."

A spokeswoman for the school district did not return a message seeking comment in time for this story.

But an attorney for the district, Jack Canna, told the Arlington Heights Daily Herald that administrators were disappointed the T-shirt message would be permitted.

"We respect the very narrow ruling by the court and are prepared to let (Nuxoll wear the shirt)," Canna said. "This isn't all bad in that the ruling is specifically limited to that phrase but it doesn't allow other derogatory speech. That's pretty important."

The school district had argued the T-shirts are derogatory and cause disruptions to students' education.

But the three-judge appeals panel, which heard arguments from attorneys in Nuxoll's case, said it could not accept claims that the school acted properly on grounds it was protecting the rights of the students against whom derogatory comments were directed.

"Of course a school can — often it must — protect students from the invasion of their legal rights by other students," Judge Richard Posner wrote in the opinion. "But people do not have a legal right to prevent criticism of their beliefs or for that matter their way of life."

Judge Ilana Kara Diamond Rovner wrote a separate concurrence that went further than Posner’s majority opinion. “I view this as a simple case,” Rovner wrote. “We are bound by the rule of Tinker v. [Des Moines Independent Community School Dist.], a case that the majority portrays in such a convoluted fashion that the discussion folds in on itself like a Möbius strip.”

She added: “Open debate is the very value preserved by the First Amendment and yet the majority reduces it to stealth viewpoint discrimination.”

Both sides pushed for a decision before today’s National Day of Silence, when students take a vow of silence to protest bullying, harassment and discrimination in schools, and the National Day of Truth on April 28, when Nuxoll wanted to wear the "Be Happy, Not Gay" shirt.


Previous
Federal judge upholds school's ban on anti-gay T-shirt
Court won't grant preliminary injunction allowing students to wear 'Be Happy, Not Gay' shirts in protest of National Day of Silence. 04.18.07

Related

Judge: Ban on 'Straight Pride' shirt violated student's rights

Officials at Minnesota school failed to demonstrate that teen's shirt could be disruptive, federal court rules. 01.18.02

Federal judge backs school’s ban of anti-gay T-shirt

Ruling is based on 9th Circuit decision that found message on Tyler Harper's shirt infringed upon the rights of other students 'in the most fundamental way.' 02.14.08

Pa. school disciplines student for wearing gun T-shirt
Family files federal free-speech lawsuit after Donald Miller refuses to turn 'Volunteer Homeland Security' shirt inside-out. 03.13.08

Fla. teen can wear gay-pride symbols to school
Federal judge rules that Heather Gillman's free-speech rights were violated by high school's ban on rainbows, other expressions of support for homosexuals. 05.15.08

Fla. town backs ex-principal in campaign against gay students
Many Ponce de Leon residents unhappy that David Davis was demoted after federal judge reprimanded him for conducting 'witch hunt,' suspending those who protested. 08.22.08

ACLU asks district to drop suspensions over memorial T-shirts
Nebraska high school officials say 23 students violated district's dress policy by wearing shirts honoring slain friend. 09.02.08

Colo. student suspended for donning anti-Obama shirt
Eleven-year-old and his father say punishment violated First Amendment, but school says he was disciplined because T-shirt was causing disruption, not because of message it bore. 09.24.08

Pa. teen can't wear gun T-shirt to school
'Students have no constitutional right to promote violence in our public schools,' federal judge says. 10.06.08

Student's report on Harvey Milk prompts censorship claim
ACLU threatens to sue San Diego County school if officials don't apologize for barring sixth-grader from giving in-class presentation. 05.21.09

Debating homosexuality in schools: Censorship doesn’t work
By Charles C. Haynes Trying to stifle speech for or against homosexuality rides on false hope that harmony, tolerance will prevail if no one is allowed to say anything that might offend anyone. 08.24.03

Sexual orientation and public schools: all or nothing?
By Charles C. Haynes Administrators, parents can work past cultural standoff toward schools that are both safe and free for all students. 02.17.08

Cartoons, T-shirts and more: why we must protect what offends
By Gene Policinski The same First Amendment protections that shield offensive speech from government censorship also protect those who would speak in opposition. 05.18.08

Are students canaries in the free-speech coal mine?
By Charles C. Haynes We can predict the future health of freedom of speech in America by looking at how public schools live up to — or fail to live up to — the First Amendment. 05.25.08

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 18:18:31
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links