First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
print this   Print

Paris Hilton can sue over greeting card she finds not so 'hot'

By The Associated Press,
First Amendment Center Online staff

SAN FRANCISCO — An appeals court has ruled that Paris Hilton can pursue a lawsuit against Hallmark Cards Inc. over the use of her picture and catchphrase "That's hot" on a greeting card.

The hotel heiress sued the company in 2007 after it began selling without her permission birthday cards of a cartoon of a waitress serving a plate of food to a patron. A photo of Hilton's face was pasted on the cartoon's body.

According the ruling in Hilton v. Hallmark, the front of the card includes a caption that reads, “Paris’s First Day as a Waitress.” “Hilton says to the customer, ‘Don’t touch that, it’s hot.’ The customer asks, ‘what’s hot?’ Hilton replies, ‘That’s hot.’ The inside of the card reads, ‘Have a smokin’ hot birthday.’”

Hilton alleges that Hallmark violated her rights of privacy and publicity and that the card ripped off her appearance as a waitress in an episode of her reality television show "The Simple Life."

On Aug. 31, a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's ruling allowing the bulk of Hilton's lawsuit to proceed. Hallmark has defended the card as parody, which is normally protected under fair-use law.

The 9th Circuit analyzed and rejected Hallmark’s claim that the card was “transformative” enough to be entitled to protection under the First Amendment.

Hallmark lawyer Lincoln Bandlow told Reuters that "the analysis of the First Amendment defense is incorrect. It will leave a lot of speakers subjected to meritless right of publicity claims."


Celebrity body parts take center stage in discussion on right to publicity

Panelists debate the right of celebrities to control their images and whether this control erodes the First Amendment. 03.06.00

Appeals panel reverses $3 million award in actor's suit against magazine

Federal judges rule computer-altered image of Dustin Hoffman in drag was protected speech not 'exploitative commercial' use of his likeness. 07.09.01

Three Stooges' heirs get last laugh as high court refuses appeal
Los Angeles artist was seeking First Amendment protection for photographers, artists who specialize in celebrity images. 01.08.02

Mo. appeals court upholds $15 million verdict for Tony Twist
Hockey player had sued after comic-book creator used his name without permission for a character in 'Spawn' series. 06.21.06

Judge blocks publication of Salinger spinoff book
Swedish author's Catcher in the Rye 'sequel' mirrors classic too closely, federal judge finds; parody argument also rejected. 07.02.09

2nd Circuit mulls dispute over Catcher in the Rye spinoff
Three-judge panel expresses doubts about whether lower court judge heard enough evidence before blocking U.S. publication of book. 09.04.09

North Face not amused by 'South Butt' parody
California clothing company files suit, saying college student's products cross line into trademark infringement. 12.23.09

North Face, South Butt settle legal dispute
Clothing giant's lawsuit had claimed Missouri teenager's products violated copyright. 04.12.10

Paris Hilton vs. Hallmark: Publicity rights, First Amendment collide
By David L. Hudson Jr. Company's use of star's image on greeting card raises question of whether celebrities must be paid if their images are used in spoofs. 03.18.10

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.

Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 18:44:15
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Freedom Sings™
First Amendment

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment

Lesson plans
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links