First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

White House urges high court to allow state aid for religious studies

By The Associated Press
09.11.03

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration has stepped into the Supreme Court’s next major church-state case, seeking to allow some states to spend tax money on college students’ religious education.

The administration, in briefs this week on an appeal of a Washington state case, said states that set up general scholarship programs cannot deny money to those who want to study for ministry careers.

“Such a stigmatizing religious classification is prohibited by the First Amendment and inconsistent with our traditions,” Solicitor General Theodore Olson wrote.

Also this week at the high court, the California man who wants the words “under God” removed from the Pledge of Allegiance asked Justice Antonin Scalia to stay out of the case because of public remarks that Scalia made this year at a religious event.

Michael Newdow, a Sacramento doctor and atheist, said in a court filing that Scalia violated conduct rules that prevent judges from discussing the merits of cases, and that there are questions about his impartiality. The court is expected to consider whether to hear appeals involving the pledge during a closed-door session on Sept. 29.

Justices have not yet said when they will hear arguments in the scholarship case, a follow-up to last year’s landmark ruling upholding school-voucher programs.

Olson said that Washington state’s scholarship program is unconstitutional because it treats people who want to study theology at religious schools differently than other students.

The history of Washington’s ban on state spending for religious classes stems from opposition in the 19th century to the Catholic Church, Olson said, which “provides all the more reason to reject any reliance on the provision here as a means of justifying the discriminatory treatment.” More than 30 states have these Blaine amendments.

On the other side, many groups told the court that the Washington ban was not passed to suppress religion and that states should be allowed to control their own rules for church-state policies.

“This is an activist administration that has sought at every opportunity to erode the wall that separates church and state and to interject religion into governmental operations at every turn,” said Ayesha Khan, legal director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, one of the groups supporting Washington.

In the Pledge of Allegiance case, Newdow persuaded a federal appeals court last year that the classroom salute to the American flag is unconstitutional because of the reference to God. The decision has been appealed to the Supreme Court.

Scalia, considered the high court’s most conservative member, referred to that ruling in a January speech as an example that courts are misinterpreting the Constitution. He said at a Knights of Columbus rally in Fredericksburg, Va., that the framers did not intend to “exclude God from the public forums and from political life.”

Newdow said in the filing that justices may be religious but they “cannot give the appearance of a bias which might interfere with impartial legal analysis.”

Douglas Kmiec, a Pepperdine University constitutional law professor and former legal adviser to Republican presidents, said Scalia did not specifically discuss the pledge case. “It doesn’t surprise me that Mr. Newdow would seek to gain numerical advantage by encouraging Justice Scalia to recuse himself. I doubt that the justice will feel any obligation to do so, nor should he,” Kmiec said.

The cases are Locke v. Davey, 02-1315, and United States v. Newdow, 02-1574, Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, 02-1624, and Newdow v. Congress, 03-7.


Update
Justices set to hear religious-scholarship case
High court to hear appeal of 9th Circuit decision that found Washington state couldn't limit what Joshua Davey could study using state money. 12.01.03

Previous
Supreme Court to say when states can fund theology studies
Justices to decide whether Washington state was right to bar taxpayer funds for college student because of his major. 05.19.03

Related

Bush asks Supreme Court to preserve 'under God' in pledge

'Whatever else the establishment clause may prohibit, this court's precedents make clear that it does not forbid the government from officially acknowledging the religious heritage, foundation and character of this nation,' administration court filing says. 05.01.03

High court agrees to settle Part II of voucher battle

By Tony Mauro Some hope case about state scholarships for theology students will topple barriers to voucher programs. 05.20.03

Vouchers

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, April 23, 2010 | 18:46:36
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links