First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Chief justice: Scene at State of Union 'very troubling'

By The Associated Press
03.10.10

TUSCALOOSA, Ala. — U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts said yesterday the scene at President Barack Obama’s first State of the Union address was “very troubling” and that the annual speech to Congress has “degenerated into a political pep rally.”

Responding to a University of Alabama law student’s question about the Senate’s method of confirming justices, Roberts said senators improperly try to make political points by asking questions they know nominees can’t answer because of judicial ethics rules.

“I think the process is broken down,” he said.

Obama chided the Court for its campaign-finance decision during the January address, with six of the Court’s nine justices seated before him in their black robes.

Roberts said he wonders whether justices should attend the address.

“To the extent the State of the Union has degenerated into a political pep rally, I’m not sure why we’re there,” said Roberts, a Republican nominee who joined the Court in 2005.

Roberts said anyone is free to criticize the Court and that some have an obligation to do so because of their positions.

“So I have no problems with that,” he said. “On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances and the decorum. The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the Court — according the requirements of protocol — has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling.”

Breaking from tradition, Obama used the speech to criticize the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which allows corporations and unions to freely spend money to run political ads for or against specific candidates.

“With all due deference to the separation of powers, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said.

Justice Samuel Alito was the only justice to respond at the time, shaking his head and appearing to mouth the words “not true” as Obama continued.

In response to Roberts’ remarks yesterday, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs focused on the Court’s decision and not the chief justice’s point about the time and place for criticism of the Court.

“What is troubling is that this decision opened the floodgates for corporations and special interests to pour money into elections — drowning out the voices of average Americans,” Gibbs said. “The president has long been committed to reducing the undue influence of special interests and their lobbyists over government. That is why he spoke out to condemn the decision and is working with Congress on a legislative response.”

Justice Antonin Scalia once said he no longer goes to the annual speech because the justices “sit there like bumps on a log” in an otherwise highly partisan atmosphere.

Roberts opened his appearance in Alabama with a 30-minute lecture on the history of the Supreme Court and became animated as he answered students’ questions. He joked about a recent rumor that he was stepping down from the Court and said he didn’t know he wanted to be a lawyer until he was in law school.

While Associate Justice Clarence Thomas told students at Alabama last fall he saw little value in oral arguments before the Court, Roberts disagreed.

“Maybe it’s because I participated in it a lot as a lawyer,” Roberts said. “I’d hate to think it didn’t matter.”


Related

Obama lashes out at high court over campaign finance

Democrats trying to devise new restraints on corporate election spending in wake of Citizens United ruling. 01.25.10

Justice Thomas defends Citizens United ruling

Supreme Court jurist also says some criticisms of the high court 'border on being irresponsible.' 02.05.10

Alito objected to Obama's history claim
On basis of justice's questions in Citizens United arguments, it seems clear he took issue with assertion that ruling 'reversed a century of law.' 02.08.10

O'Connor: Campaign-finance ruling could affect judicial races
Retired Supreme Court justice says high court decision loosening restrictions on campaign spending by companies, unions could filter down to states that elect judges. 03.04.10

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Saturday, April 24, 2010 | 00:06:04
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links