THE HILL
 

Tread lightly on healthcare

By A.B. Stoddard - 01/19/11 05:34 PM ET

Sometimes when the day of reckoning arrives, the polling has shifted. In addition to the ironic new polling showing Democrats’ favorable ratings up since they lost their majority in the House, opposition to the healthcare reform law and support for repealing it have markedly declined. House Republicans, in power just two weeks, have succeeded in repudiating President Obama’s signature achievement by voting to repeal the healthcare law. But as repeal fades from the headlines, and from reality, Republicans must proceed with caution in an ever-shifting political landscape where the economy and deficit reduction are the top priorities of the electorate.

While a new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds majorities of respondents believe the law will cut jobs, hurt the economy and grow the deficit, only 18 percent of respondents support repealing the entire law. A new AP-GfK poll shows that intense opposition to the law has weakened and, remarkably, that among Republicans, support for repeal went from 61 percent following the midterm elections to 49 percent now. The survey showed support vs. opposition at 40/41 percent, a single percentage point that had narrowed from nine points after the election. That same poll shows only 25 percent support for repeal.

Because several of the law’s appealing benefits kick in early, Democrats have stepped up a public awareness campaign to make sure voters are hearing about free screenings, the ability to keep children on their insurance up until age 26, high-risk insurance pools and the rebate checks seniors are receiving for their prescription drugs. The Health and Human Services Department released a report on the eve of the vote that found 20 percent to 50 percent of Americans under the age of 65 have pre-existing conditions that could keep them from getting healthcare coverage. Since that same study somehow never made its way into the initial debate over healthcare reform, it’s easy to agree with House Republicans who called it a public-relations stunt. Still, it’s dramatic data, nonetheless. 

Since Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) isn’t likely to bring the repeal bill up for a vote in the Senate, and the House vote is hardly a threat to the law, it’s easy to agree with Democrats that the House vote was a political stunt. But the vote will be followed by oversight hearings and in all likelihood numerous bills designed to strip onerous and unpopular provisions from the law that Democrats up for reelection in 2012 may find hard to vote against.

But the road to punching holes in the law will be bumpy and fraught with traps.

While House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) was telling reporters Tuesday that Republicans surely didn’t intend to ask seniors who fall into the “doughnut hole” and had received $250 rebate checks for their prescription drugs to return the checks if the repeal went through, House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) office was circulating a fact-check press release that stated “the Democrats’ ‘fix’ was a backroom deal with PhRMA that will raise prescription drug costs and cost taxpayers tens of billions ... the new healthcare law will increase premiums for 33 million seniors enrolled in Medicare Part D by as much as 9 percent and costs taxpayers $42.6 billion.”

Seniors will want to know, which is it? With repeal behind them, Republicans — who have released no bill of their own but have directed committees to begin the process of writing some — will want to come up with answers soon.

The law might be as weak as the Republicans claim it is. And they may succeed in changing much of it. But it could grow more popular in the months to come. Careful treading will be required.

Stoddard is an associate editor of The Hill.


Source:
http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/ab-stoddard/138903-tread-lightly-on-healthcare

Comments (17)

More incompetence, Ms. Sttodard. The AP poll you mentioned and repeated on the Fox panel today is has deeply flawed numbers: it oversampled Dems and under-sampled Reps. Lies, lies, lies…BY AP on 01/19/2011 at 18:52
More hyper-partisanship, AP. Anything that don't align with your extremist RightWing worldview just HAS to be "lies, lies, lies". Epistemic Closure's got one HECK of a 359º blind spot, feller.BY Honest Abe on 01/19/2011 at 22:03
Excellent analysis by A.B …

Looks like some the House GOP members and Democrats who votes to repeal ‘ObamaCare’ will now have some to add to the voting record for the next election (some of them campaign in the mid-term election just to do that; their constituents will be happy to see that they have fulfilled their promise).

At least now we have a Balance of Power: the ‘Left’ won’t be guaranteed to pass potential undesirable legislations for the next two-years.
BY ShallRemainNameless on 01/20/2011 at 08:49
20 to 50 percent of americans under 65 have a pre existing condition? Why haven't we heard of that before? Were did the data come from? More lies to come out of Kathleen"s mouth. We can keep the good part but get rid of the other 2000 pages. Let us also get rid of Kathleen's death panel.BY bunky on 01/20/2011 at 13:42
Not buying it. When they were ramming their health bill down our throats, the Democrats ignored widespread polling that showed Amercans' opposed it.

The GOP should ignore any polling as well — especially since the MSM polling is biased and overly weighted with Democrats.

The much more credible and accurate Rasmussen polling still shows the vast majority of Americans oppose.
BY repeal obamacare on 01/20/2011 at 14:22
And again with the extremists with pseudo-sexual violent porn language: "CRAMMING it down our throats"—- "Repeal Obamacare"? You are ridiculous. At 18 months long, the health care debate was—- wait for it—- the LONGEST IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES. If THAT was some "cramming down your throat"—- you've either developed gills to breathe down a different airway, or you are a patent extremist and have no idea what you are talking about.BY Honest Abe on 01/20/2011 at 15:47
This poll is a perfect example how the AP an Obama "Information Minsitry"stalwart will use whatever deception necessary to prop up any disaster foisted upon the country by the inept, radical Statist, community organizer.

"When the AP/GfK poll screened for likely voters a couple of weeks before the election, it estimated that 48 percent of voters leaned Republican and that 42 percent leaned Democratic (which the election showed to be about right). In this pollAP/GfK didn't screen for likely voters and didn't screen for registered voters. Instead, it merely surveyed 1,001 adults.

More egregious, the percentage of Democratic-leaning respondents stayed the same (42 percent), but the percentage of Republican-leaning respondents dropped by 12 points, to 36 percent." So from 48 to 36% Republican sample, November poll to this one.

So after slaughtering the Democrats in thed election, the corrupt, dishonest AP polled 12% fewer Republicans, and used the least accurate sample, adults!

I'm surprised , and disappointed that Ms Stoddard didn't know, or worse yet purposely witheld the critical information above.
BY tonymo on 01/20/2011 at 16:10
(dis)Honest Abe:

The only "debate" on this disaster was between Democrats in the senate who hated the House version, and in the Housw who hated the senate version!

There is no "debate" required when you have a veto proof majority in the House, and a filibuster prood majority in the senate which the Democrats had.

Despite that they had to bribe numerous senators to vote for their own bill, and lie to pro-life House members by telling them there would be no federal funding for abortion!

There were more votes for repeal in the House than there were for passage, which included 3 Democrats. Harry Reid is petrified to bring the bill up in ther senate because there are 23 Democrart senators up for re-election in 2012, many in red states!

Oh, Abe, everything I said is available in the public domain, so you don't need a Top Secret clearance to obtain it!!
BY tonymo on 01/20/2011 at 16:22
"No Debate Necessary" Tony—- then, OBVIOUSLY, we have a health care bill that's single payer, right? And every single citizen can buy in to the exact same insurance that Congress gets? What? No? There's no strong public option tied to Medicare rates? No? There's no Weak Public Option NOT tied to Medicare rates? There's no "trigger" that puts a Public Option into effect if the health insurance industry does not alter malfeasant practices? No? Not even that? There's ONLY the Republicans' Individual Mandate? That's IT? Wow. Really—- that's really "no debate whatsoever". "Available in the public domain"—- meaning: you are too lazy to actually source any specific points. Gotcha. That much is crystal clear.BY HOnest Abe on 01/20/2011 at 17:06
"Petrified to bring it up?" Man—- it was mindless vapid kabuke. They drew up the bill in the House KNOWING it would go absolutely nowhere. Period. Oh, btw—- nice focus on Jobs Jobs Jobs, eh? Vapid hyper-partisan kabuke—- but why stop when the same old lies did SO WELL for them, eh?BY Honest Abe on 01/20/2011 at 17:10

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.