The Wonk Room

Where Will Bank Lobbyists Focus Their Fire On Dodd’s Financial Reform Bill?

On Monday, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) released the latest version of his legislation overhauling the nation’s financial regulatory system. President Obama has praised the bill, saying that it “provides a strong foundation to build a safer financial system.”

Of course, the bill has set off a flurry of lobbying, particularly because Dodd has scheduled a committee markup for Monday. In fact, “just hours” after the bill came out, financial services lobbyists were taking shots at it, while the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has pledged to spend $3 million (in addition to the $3 million is has reportedly already spent) on watering down or blocking the bill.

Aside from the new consumer protection entity, which has been a flashpoint for months, a few provisions are emerging as the focus of the lobbying efforts, as groups look to blunt the effects of new laws or win themselves carve-outs and exemptions. Here are some of the key places where lawmakers need to take a stand against the financial services industry:

– No federal preemption of state law: Dodd’s bill, like the reform effort passed by the House last year, allows states to write stronger consumer protection laws than those set by the federal government (creating a federal floor for regulation, instead of a ceiling). The bill gives federal regulators the ability to preempt state law on a case-by-case basis, but banks want full federal preemption of the states, so that they only have to focus on watering down laws at the federal level. Allowing states to crack down on financial shenanigans at the state level could have mitigated much of the subprime lending that occurred in the buildup to the economic crisis.

– Better corporate governance: Provisions crafted by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that give shareholders more power over their companies and hold corporate management more accountable for misdeeds are included in the bill. These changes are despised by big business groups like the Chamber, which is “mobilizing forces to lobby lawmakers” against them. Current imbalances make it incredibly difficult for shareholders to influence corporate directors or hold down excessive risk-taking (and excessive executive compensation); Schumer’s changes would start to change this.

– No carve-outs: Just like during the House debate, various business want to exempt themselves from various new rules. Credit unions want to avoid oversight by the new Bureau for Financial Consumer Protection, while corporations want to avoid having to clear derivatives on exchanges. But exemptions such as these create an uneven playing field and cause every lawmaker to search for a carve-out for his or her local businesses. Obama seems firm on preventing carve-outs, saying that he will not accept attempts to exempt “banks, credit card companies or nonbank firms such as debt collectors, credit bureaus, payday lenders or auto dealers” from the new rules.

The House bill passed last year, while strong overall, did include some unfortunate exemptions (like allowing auto dealers to escape oversight from new consumer protection rules). It’s a sure thing that the financial industry will try even harder to turn the Senate bill into swiss cheese, with loopholes and exemptions everywhere.






2 Responses to “Where Will Bank Lobbyists Focus Their Fire On Dodd’s Financial Reform Bill?”

  1. stateofthedivision Says:

    Better corporate governance is not dependent on shareholder voting. It’s foundation is better leadership theory, i.e. jettisoning the “generation of meanness and greed” cited by GE CEO Jeff Immelt.

    As for holding corporate management accountable for misdeeds, Uncle Sam regularly looked the other way. Take widespread stock option backdating. Add Obama’s pledge to look the other way on fraud contributing to the financial meltdown.

    The NY Fed and SEC were inside Lehman for six months before it imploded. Regulators and accountants from Ernst & Young approved of Lehman’s shenanigans.

    The Dodd bill does nothing to contain private equity underwriters (PEU’s), especially if the Volcker Rule provision are dropped. That’s a huge carve out.

    http://peureport.blogspot.com/2010/03/senator-chris-dodds-peu-joke.html


  2. stateofthedivision Says:

    Now the SEC is “exploring the use of off balance sheet accounting” in firms other than Lehman.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5g-DgsmcTTUhwuMbF0MRfvJ1ARHxAD9EGG9M82

    Funny, SEC staff were inside the big Wall Street firms after Bear Sterns fall. They already know the answer. This announcement is for public consumption.

    While I didn’t know the details of Repo 105, I hit the mark with my Sept. 20, 2008 post:

    http://peureport.blogspot.com/2008/09/derivatives-off-balance-sheet-items.html


Leave a Reply

Formatting: Use the buttons below to apply basic HTML styles. Or use these tags directly: <a href=""> <abbr> <acronym> <blockquote> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <q> <strong>


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
image Register imageimageRSSimageimage imageimage
image
Latest Posts

Advertisement

Issues

Alerts

image
Sign up for Wonk Room Alerts



image
Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Wonk RoomimageimageContact UsimageimageDonateimage