Campaign Finance Reform
The ACLU believes that the system of electing candidates to federal office badly needs repair. And we will continue to advocate reform of the current system — such as our longstanding support for full public financing — but in doing so we will stress fidelity to the principles protected by the First Amendment with the goal of expanding, not limiting, political speech.
Related Content
8/28/2009 | Connecticut | Campaign Finance Reform
Judge Rules Connecticut Campaign Finance Law Unconstitutional
6/16/2009 | Colorado | Campaign Finance Reform
ACLU Defends Francisco Reina And Sues In District Court To Challenge Craig's 500 Dollar Spending Limit
12/5/2006 | Rhode Island | Campaign Finance Reform
Under Pressure from ACLU, Rhode Island Politician Drops Defamation Lawsuit Against Activist
6/26/2006 | Campaign Finance Reform
Supreme Court Affirms ACLU Position that Vermont Campaign Finance Measure Would Limit Free Speech
5/8/2006 | Rhode Island | Campaign Finance Reform
ACLU of Rhode Island Challenges Political Canvassing Restrictions
8/28/2009 | Connecticut | Campaign Finance Reform
Judge Rules Connecticut Campaign Finance Law Unconstitutional
6/16/2009 | Colorado | Campaign Finance Reform
ACLU Defends Francisco Reina And Sues In District Court To Challenge Craig's 500 Dollar Spending Limit
12/5/2006 | Rhode Island | Campaign Finance Reform
Under Pressure from ACLU, Rhode Island Politician Drops Defamation Lawsuit Against Activist
6/26/2006 | Campaign Finance Reform
Supreme Court Affirms ACLU Position that Vermont Campaign Finance Measure Would Limit Free Speech
5/8/2006 | Rhode Island | Campaign Finance Reform
ACLU of Rhode Island Challenges Political Canvassing Restrictions
4/27/2006 | Rhode Island | Campaign Finance Reform
In Victory for Free Speech, Court Strikes Down Rhode Island’s Restrictions on Campaigning Over Ballot Questions
2/28/2006 | Vermont | Campaign Finance Reform
Vermont Campaign Finance Measure Would Limit Free Speech, ACLU Tells Supreme Court
11/2/2005 | Campaign Finance Reform
ACLU Letter to the House of Representatives Urging a "Yes" Vote on H.R. 1606, the "Online Freedom of Speech Act"
2/13/2002 | Campaign Finance Reform
Coalition Letter to the House Urging Opposition to Shays-Meehan Bill
2/13/2002 | Campaign Finance Reform
Letter to the House Urging Opposition to the Armey Amendment to Shays-Meehan Bill
2/12/2002 | Campaign Finance Reform
Letter to the House in Opposition to the Shays-Meehan bill, the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2001
6/12/2001 | Campaign Finance Reform
Testimony of ACLU President Nadine Strossen Before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitutional Issues of Campaign Finance Reform Legislation
3/20/2001 | Campaign Finance Reform
Letter to the Senate in Opposition to the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2001
Act Now
Sign A Message of Support
The ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) are bringing a landmark case on behalf of researchers, pathologists, breast cancer and women’s health groups, and individual women affected by the patents on two genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer. It's wrong for companies to own the rights to pieces of the human genome.
Related Multimedia
Liberate the Breast Cancer Genes
On May 12, 2009, the ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation filed a suit on behalf of organizations and individuals representing over 150,000 health professionals and women's ...