Thailand: Jihadists murder three Muslims

Ever wonder why genuinely peaceful Muslims don't speak out more forthrightly against the jihadists? Here is one reason. Apparently these people were killed for not joining the jihad. (There are other reasons why peaceful Muslims don't speak up -- most notably that they know that the jihadists have the Koran and Sunnah on their side.) "Three Muslims killed in restive Thai south: police," from AFP, September 27 (thanks to Maxwell):

NARATHIWAT, Thailand -- Suspected Islamic militants have shot dead three Muslims in separate attacks in Thailand's troubled south this weekend, local police said Sunday.

A Muslim army sergeant, 33, and his wife were shot on Saturday evening by three gunmen hidden at the roadside as they travelled home by motorcycle in Narathiwat province.

The man died instantly while his wife died later in hospital, police said.

On Sunday, a Muslim defence volunteer was killed and a local district chief injured when a bomb was detonated near a mosque in Yala province.

Defence volunteers are trained and armed by the state to protect civilians against insurgents....

| 8 Comments
Print this entry | Email this entry | Digg this | del.icio.us |

8 Comments

Hmmmm.... restive.

As much as Infidels suffer at the hands of Muslims, it is always Muslims who form the greatest number of the victims of Islam.

The entire idea that if only Infidels embrace Islam they will be safe from the depredations of Muslims could not be more false.

This is a "religion" which eats its own.

Wait, I thought once the whole world goes Muslim then there will be peace on earth. They're not lying to us again, are they?

A Muslims worst enemy is another Muslim...It is proven every day..

These Muslims were shot by the jihadist mobsters, the self-appointed sharia enforcers, because they were working for the Infidel authorities; that is, they were perceived as being collaborators with the kafir and thus disloyal to the Ummah or Muslim Mob.

PS

The AFP weaselwords really get on my works. I amuse myself by going through articles like this, mentally translating the terms into something a bit more accurate.

'Restive Thai south'. Translation: 'Jihad-wracked Thai south'.

'Thailand's *troubled* south'. Translation - 'Thailand's jihad-wracked mostly-Muslim south'.

'Militants' , 'gunmen', 'insurgents'. Suggested truthful alternative terms - 'Jihadists', or perhaps 'jihadist sharia-enforcers' or 'sharia-pushers'.


Do you feel restive, troubled, or perturbed today? ;)

You forgot to add 'volatile'.

That's the other favourite of Reuters, AP, and AFP, primly alluding to the sorts of places - Chechnya, for example, or Swat, or the hellpits of Afghanistan or the worst jihadist hangouts in Mesopotamia - where all sorts of things are liable unexpectedly to fly up in the air or sideways as the result of the application of detonators to high explosive, via a martyr-murder jihadist, or a carefully placed roadside bomb.