The fruits of weakness and appeasement are increasingly apparent. "Barack and Hassan concur, the US is waning," by Michael Young for Now Lebanon, December 4 (thanks to Barry Rubin):
It's not often that Barack Obama and Hassan Nasrallah agree, but both made important speeches this week, and both appeared to concur that American power was on the decline.Of course Obama didn't quite put it that way. Instead, he merely implied the growing sense of American difficulty, the fact that the United States was "passing through a time of great trial," which he made more palatable by sandwiching it between words of encouragement and resolve. His speech to West Point cadets on Tuesday was an effort to explain to his countrymen why it was important to send an additional 30,000 or so troops to Afghanistan. But what remained, despite the soaring rhetoric toward the end of the president's speech, was the terrible burden all this placed on an America much gloomier than it was decades ago.
Obama chose to highlight domestic American rifts, when he remarked that "years of debate over Iraq and terrorism have left our unity on national security issues in tatters, and created a highly polarized and partisan backdrop for this effort." He drew attention to America's economic travails by noting that "[i]n the wake of an economic crisis, too many of our neighbors and friends are out of work and struggle to pay the bills. Too many Americans are worried about the future facing our children. Meanwhile, competition within the global economy has grown more fierce. So we can't simply afford to ignore the price of these wars."
As for the American enterprise in Afghanistan, the centerpiece of Obama's speech was that he would actually start withdrawing American soldiers by July 2011. No, the United States would not bankroll an Afghan nation-building project, because (and here the president sounded more like a shopkeeper than a purveyor of global domination) such a scheme "sets goals that are beyond what can be achieved at a reasonable cost."...
Expect America's foes in the Middle East to take more advantage of this situation. The Iranian regime, rather visibly, does not believe the Obama administration will attack Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear capability. And Obama's haste to get out of Iraq, or Afghanistan as soon as he can, like his bellyaches about the economic difficulties facing the republic, exhibit far too little American nerve to frighten Tehran....
Obama's caution is defensible in some regards. War alone cannot be the benchmark of American power. Nothing would do more to harm the US than for it to sink itself into myriad conflicts it cannot win outright. In some ways, however, Obama failed to pick up on that lesson in the political realm, making ambitious promises concerning several complex Middle Eastern issues, without setting clear priorities, so that today, with little progress evident in any of them, the president stands discredited.
The mounting perception of American weakness will, arguably, be the most destabilizing factor in the Middle East in the coming years. It will alarm Washington's allies and empower its foes, and Barack Obama's stiff-upper-lip displays of candor, his persistent enunciation of American inadequacies, will only make things worse. Power may be a source of great evil, but not nearly as much as a power vacuum.
What a quieter!
Even if it were true (and IT IS NOT!) this idiot should never say anything like this to the public. It does nothing to help and everything to hurt. But, we forget he is more concern about his image, power and base than the country. That is ever and always in his calculations. That is why it took so long for him to make up the speech. He had to sound out his base to see their reaction.
What happened to speak softly and carry a big stick. This president is the worse thing that has happen to the country. It even overshadows the Dec 7 and Sept 11 attacks because the vast majority of the American public are asleep and want the government to fix everything. SAD isn't it!
The Obamanation is America's greatest enemy.
I happen to think Obama is the perfect postmodern president. Most academics and nihilist philosophers will tell you the act of actually defending something, like America, is a crass exercise in sappy sentimentalism since there is no real proof that anything is worth expending that much energy for. Or the idea that freedom is necessarily so much better than despotism--who decided that? Isn't freedom, like any other pleasure, only the result of our bourgeoisie prejudices and random synaptic activities in the human brain? Obama is great since he makes no pretense of either loving America or caring about the welfare of its citizens in the face of mounting violence and rhetoric from its enemies. Finally, a realist!
/Dr. Numneutz, tenured chair of zeppelin spotting at whatever state university
Nothing would do more to harm the US than for it to sink itself into myriad conflicts it cannot win outright.
Allow the troops to actually fight a war instead of being part of a political tool and there isn't a war the U.S. can't win. Hamstring yourself with self-defeating 'ROE' and you are done before you start.
If the US is abandoning its role as leader of the free world, who will step in and do it?
Switzerland?
And if America isn't really in decline yet, Red Hussein is going to make sure it happens, personally.
If America is in decline, perhaps Michelle [my belle] will at last feel proud to be domiciled in the US of A.
I think Barack Obama has a split personality disorder one day he's a statist the next day he's fiscally conservative.
This man makes no sense to me he is all over the board.
Healthcare reform = Trillion dollar statist.
Defense = jewish. lol!!! (no offense)
The real bitch of it all is his healthcare reform agenda will not improve our lives any. It will ruin the whole entire healthcare system. What's the point of healthcare when a dirty bomb takes out New york?
And why shouldn't two Muslim brothers agree?