You have a right to free speech as long as you are saying what conservatives want you to say.
The Samurai Blue’s loss against Croatia showed that scoring penalties is a distinct art.
Belgium’s elimination from the World Cup showed that sometimes, for no apparent reason, the ball just won’t go in.
Twelve years ago, Uruguayan striker Luis Suárez blocked Ghana’s shot at the semifinals with a handball. On Friday, they’ll get a chance to bite back.
Even if Trump himself departs the scene, conservative demand for his approach to politics will remain.
Soccer is where mini monarchs reign supreme.
But not in the way you might think.
Right-wing anger over a defamation judgment reflects disgust at seeing the rules applied to them.
An Arizona law seeks to solve the problem of police misconduct by preventing anyone from documenting it.
The demand to keep politics out of art is too often a demand for art to conform to conservative politics.
The attack on Salman Rushdie was not a product of modern social-justice discourse.
Progressives aren’t the only ones who need free-speech protections.
For Trumpists, no system that results in a Republican loss can be considered legitimate.
A revealing photo removed any remaining ambiguity.
Republicans’ reflexive insistence that the Mar-a-Lago raid is politically motivated is unmoored from the available evidence.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that fundamental rights of same-sex couples are safe.
In Moore v. Harper the Supreme Court will decide if anyone besides itself should be able to adjudicate American election law.
By making a false comparison, GOP apparatchiks hope to cushion the political fallout of Roe’s demise.
Conservatives think they are righting a historical wrong, but the two decisions represent entirely different approaches to the law.
The former president attempted to violently overthrow the government of the United States, and his party ensured that he would face no consequences for doing so.