Dispensing truth in liberal doses...and...where on April 14, 2009 I went to bed a conservative gun owner but awoke the next morning, according to the DHS, a possible member of a right wing extremist group needing to be watched.
James Lewis at American Thinker hits the nail on the head:
If we’re going to play race games let’s do it scientifically. For example, if you’re black that’s meaningless unless you specify Bantu, Hutu/Tutsi, San, or any number of other lineages within Africa. Africa has the biggest human variety in the world. Obama looks totally different from the rest of the Black Caucus; it’s because he is. He belongs to a different biological lineage. He’s not a Bantu. But most American blacks are mixed-race, of course, like Obama himself.
Likewise, if you’re pure Irish, your race is Gaelic. If you’re Irish-English, you’re Gaelic-Caucasian or something close to that. If you look blond, you’re likely to be a Northern European. If you’re Jewish but you look like a Russian, you are Semitic-Nordic-Slavic. If you’re Jewish and you look like a Spaniard, you’re Semitic-Hispanic. If you’re Jewish from Yemen, you’re probably Semitic-Arabic. If you’re a pure cohen, you’re Semitic back some 3,000 years, especially if you have heritable diseases like Tay-Sachs. But of course going earlier than that, there are plenty of generations back to the human population bottleneck in North Africa, where humans were reduced to some 5,000 individuals. That’s the shared founding population for all of us. (And everybody was Black at that time.)
Of course if you’re a “white” woman, you can really get detailed, because the female (mitochondrial) lineage of Europe has been traced to less than a dozen original mothers. You can read about it in Nicholas Wade’s nice book, Before the Dawn (Wade being a New York Times science writer, and remarkably good). Or any other number of up-to-date books on human genetics.
If you’re Asian, of course, you could be anything from Han Chinese, to Malay, to Inuit.
{….}
Be scientific. This is a purely political splittist Census question. If you’re not sure, you are 99 percent right to call yourself Other. If ever the American people recover from the race-baiting insanity, we will all call ourselves Other. Because we are.
If you can’t figure it out you’re in good company.
But it helps to prove that Obama can not speak without a teleprompter and probably has no grasp of any issue threatening the US ……. with the exception of being fully versed on socialistic principles.
It ranks right up there with the US having 57 states.
Watch for the lack of coverage in reporting this among Obama’s kept-whores in the media. Then imagine the outrage and coverage if President Bush or VP Cheney had said anything like this.
Here’s Obama getting interviewed on Fox (updates below on the lie he foisted on us during the interview):
&nsp;
BAIER: Do you know which specific deals are in or out, as of today?
OBAMA: I am certain that we’ve made sure, for example, that any burdens on states are alleviated, when it comes to what they’re going to have to chip in to make sure that we’re giving subsidies to small businesses, and subsidies to individuals, for example.
BAIER: So the Connecticut deal is still in?
OBAMA: So that’s not — that’s not going to be something that is going to be in this final package. I think the same is true on all of these provisions. I’ll give you some exceptions though.
Something that was called a special deal was for Louisiana. It was said that there were billions — millions of dollars going to Louisiana, this was a special deal. Well, in fact, that provision, which I think should remain in, said that if a state has been affected by a natural catastrophe, that has created a special health care emergency in that state, they should get help. Louisiana, obviously, went through Katrina, and they’re still trying to deal with the enormous challenges that were faced because of that.
(CROSS TALK)
OBAMA: That also — I’m giving you an example of one that I consider important. It also affects Hawaii, which went through an earthquake. So that’s not just a Louisiana provision. That is a provision that affects every state that is going through a natural catastrophe.
Now I have said that there are certain provisions, like this Nebraska one, that don’t make sense. And they needed to be out. And we have removed those. So, at the end of the day, what people are going to be able to say is that this legislation is going to be providing help to small businesses and individuals, across the board, in an even handed way, and providing people relief from a status quo that’s just not working.
So ….. when did the earthquakes hit Hawaii?
In 1868 there was a major earthquake in Hawaii that killed 77 people. In 1975 an earthquake in Hawaii killed 2 people.
UPDATE!! HE LIED! (that’s not unusual given the Jug-Earred Jackass’s propensity to do so when it benefits him:
The language on page 432 of the Senate Bill applies to exactly one state: Louisiana.
ABC reported:
On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major disaster.”
The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify, saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”
I am told the section applies to exactly one state: Louisiana, the home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to get on the health care bill.
In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be written with a single world: Louisiana. (This may also help explain why the bill is long.)
The bill did not cover the hurricane damage in Texas or Mississippi. The senate bill will not cover any state that has been “affected by a natural catastrophe” despite what Obama said.
From Charley Daniels Soapbox.
Nancy Pelosi recently made the statement that Congress needed to pass the health care bill so we could find out what was in it.
Is this woman not in full control of her mental faculties or just plain dumb?
It’s got to be one or the other.To me she is a full-blown abomination to her office, and holds the office and the people she is supposed to be serving in contempt. She is a conniving sneak who would stoop to any level to get her ill begotten legislation passed.
If she is the face of the Democrat Party, the party itself is a Frankenstein monster. If she is the tip of the iceberg, then the iceberg itself, -the part hidden from view- has to be the biggest piece of corruption ever known to American politics.
Ms. Pelosi has known about resigning NY Representative Eric Massa and his sickening fondling of a young male page for a long time and did absolutely nothing about it until she started trying to weed out “No” votes against health care. I wonder how long she’s known about Charlie Rangel, but then Rangel is a “Yes” vote.
If Pelosi was in any other district than the one she’s in she couldn’t get elected to president of the local Botox injection society, but she’s probably safe in San Francisco. Do we need any other reason for term limits?
When questioned about the abortion provisions in the bill, Ms. Pelosi said something to the effect of, this is not about abortion, it’s about everybody having health care.
I beg your pardon Ms. Pelosi, it dern well is about abortion as long as the abortion provisions are left in the bill, and it’s also about all the other dirty little hidden secrets found among the 2,700-page piece of crap you’re trying to force on an unwilling American public.
Pelosi and company care not a whit about the will of the people, about the democratic process nor majority rule. They care about the accumulation of more and more power until our government is nothing more than a top-heavy dictatorship controlling our health care, our salaries, what we eat and drink and probably what time we go to bed at night.
Of course it will fail, just as Russia failed, just as Cuba failed, just as Eastern Europe failed, after the entitlements they’ll have to sustain to stay in power and the humongous bureaucracies that have to be maintained to force their will on the people get so top heavy they just topple over of their own accord, which would not be a bad thing if the rest of America would not topple with them.
Our economy, our national security, our sovereignty, even our law and order will most likely disappear from the American scene if people like Pelosi and Obama stay in power.
When you play by Obama rules the way to get out of debt is to borrow more money that you can’t pay back, and leave it up to future generations to deal with.
The way to get along with suppressive regimes is to bow to their leaders.
The way to run the greatest country on earth is to surround yourself with arrogant eggheads who, if their practical experience in the real world were dynamite there wouldn’t be enough to explode a piece of bubble gum.
Folks, if this isn’t insanity, I just don’t know what is.
To me this is a tooth and nail battle against the forces of darkness and I ain’t giving an inch. My America is too precious to me, so if I gotta go down, I’ll go down swinging, kicking and screaming.
So be it.
What do you think?
Pray for our troops, and for our country.
God Bless America
Charlie Daniels
The other day I posted a piece about how some Muslims wanted to know if their animals were still “halal” after they’d been screwed by the woman beating pedophiles practicing Islam.
Here is is, straight from the Ass’s mouth:
A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven. ["Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990]
A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighbouring village is reasonable.
If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned.
Wine and all intoxicating beverages are impure, but opium and hashish are not.
If a man sodomises the son, brother, or father of his wife after their marriage, the marriage remains valid.
During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform ablutions.
Here’s a bit more on pedophilia:
A religious decree by Khomeini ordered that girl prisoners who are virgins must be raped before execution, to prevent them from entering heaven. A Guard conducts the rape the night before execution. The next day, a marriage certificate is issued by a mullah, who sends it to the girl’s family, along with a box of chocolates as a wedding gift.
A box of chocolates?
Maybe it’s time the women of Islam rise up and cut the dicks off all their husbands. Then we might see the destruction and extermination of this most vile religion.
Funny how the media never bothers to brings up the filthiness of this and how it is practiced by a religion claiming to be peaceful yet engaging in terrorist acts.
H/T: WEASEL ZIPPERS
Most of us understand that being a republican means embracing smaller government, less spending, and lower taxes.
But when yoy have republicans split on the issue of prohibiting earmarks, then we know Washington politician still do not have a clue:
Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe on Wednesday accused his Republican colleague Sen. Jim DeMint of taking a hypocritical stand opposing earmarks, saying that the South Carolina conservative previously directed money back home for a series of road projects.
In an unusual speech on the Senate floor, Inhofe took a swipe at DeMint – as well as Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) – for their ferocity in opposing earmarks, saying: “These guys all earmarked.”
Inhofe went on to list individual earmarks DeMint has taken in the past, a sign of the tensions within the GOP Conference on the issue of spending on parochial interests.
“I went down to South Carolina, and they talked about how roads were so important down there, and he swore he would support them. He did. He kept his word,” said Inhofe, who supported an earmark moratorium DeMint proposed in 2008 but opposed a similar measure Tuesday.
“These are earmarks, Sen. DeMint, $10,000 for the construction of I-73 in Myrtle Beach. $15 million to widen U.S. 278 to six lanes. $10 million engineering design and construction of a poor access road. $10 million improvements to US-17. $5 million widening the SC-9, whatever that is. $3 million to complete the construction.
“These were earmarks that were done by Sen. DeMint, and I don’t blame him,” said Inhofe, who took issue with criticism that his support for earmarks imperiled his conservative standing. “That’s what we’re supposed to be doing.”
Asked about Inhofe’s rebuke, DeMint later said that was a thing of the past, and now he’s against what he says are wasteful and parochial spending measures that can create conflicts of interest.
“I’m a recovering earmarker, and the first step to recovery is knowing you have a problem. I figured that out – it’s time the rest of them do,” DeMint said.
It’s why I continue to say they are not fit to lead and if they get into power the spending and taxing of Obama’s democrats today will continue with them.
Just another example of how our language has been perverted to accommodate the “perverted.”
It’s an article from a Modern Mechanix of 1931 when they went searching for queer“unusual” pets.
···Here’s an excerpt but read the whole thing:
From all corners of the globe come the queer animals which modern fashion demands as pets—koa bears, ocelots, even boa constrictors. Read why alligators and raccoons have gone out of style while chimpanzees have become popular.
TIME was when the dog, cat and canary, with an occasional parrot, satisfied the demands of civilized man for pets, but today not less than half a hundred other animals and birds have been added to the list. Rather more than five and one-half million dollars worth of these strangers were imported by 122 individuals and firms to the United States alone during 1930. And this takes into account only those queer mammal, avian and insect pets imported for sale; not those brought in for their own amusement and entertainmnt by individual Americans.
One of the leading pet dealers of this country estimates that all told more than 5000 persons, outside the United States, are engaged in this suddenly-grown business of catching pets for Americans. Negroes in Africa; Indians in South America, Chinese, Hindus and Malays in Asia; even Eskimos beyond the Circle, devote their days and nights to outwitting the most intelligent of wild animals and birds with snares and traps, so that they may be delivered in good condition to ships at the nearest port for transportation to San Francisco or New York, the two great “pet ports” of the United States.
One woman, recently come into a large estate in California, ordered six burra deer from Mexico, five kangaroos from Australia, three red-and-blue lories, from the Antipodes, and seven flamingoes, from Florida. Her order was filled within a month. An- other wanted a pair of macaws—large, multicolored parrots—each of which spoke English, Spanish and French. She got them in six months and they cost her $1,000 each. A man who owns a large fenced acreage of eastern Oregon mountains, sought and obtained—for $20,000—seven snow-white, black-horned mountain goats from the snow-covered ranges of Alaska, so far “domesticated” that they could be approached without stampeding.
One man, and he seems to be unique in his industry in the United States, if not in the world, makes an extensive business of catching and training wild cats native to the United States.
This man, C. J, Ullom, prowls the mountains of the West in the spring, seeking the dens of wild cats. From these he takes the kittens, or cubs, rears them on milk fed through an ordinary nursing bottle, and literally lives among the savage little animals until they have become well accustomed to man’s presence, and to look upon him as the source of their food and comfort. He has found it impossible to tame or train a wild cat if it is caught at an age of more than two months.
Explanation: What surrounds the florid Rosette nebula? To better picture this area of the sky, the famous flowery emission nebula on the far right has been captured recently in a deep and dramatic wide field image that features several other sky highlights. Designated NGC 2237, the center of the Rosette nebula is populated by the bright blue stars of open cluster NGC 2244, whose winds and energetic light are evacuating the nebula’s center. Below the famous flower, a symbol of Valentine’s Day, is a column of dust and gas that appears like a rose’s stem but extends hundreds of light years. Across the above image, the bright blue star just left and below the center is called S Monocerotis. The star is part of the open cluster of stars labelled NGC 2264 and known as the Snowflake cluster. To the right of S Mon is a dark pointy featured called the Cone nebula, a nebula likely shaped by winds flowing out a massive star obscured by dust. To the left of S Mon is the Fox Fur nebula, a tumultuous region created by the rapidly evolving Snowflake cluster. The Rosette region, at about 5,000 light years distant, is about twice as far away as the region surrounding S Mon. The entire field can be seen with a small telescope toward the constellation of the Unicorn (Monoceros).
Big Brother warns you that filling out Census forms is mandatory and then threatens you with massive fines if you fail to reveal personal information:
How many people live in your home? Are any of them Hispanic? Are the people who live in your home citizens? How big is your home? Do you have difficulty making decisions or climbing stairs? How much do you pay for your sewage system? Are you married? What’s your rent or mortgage payment? Do you own an automobile? Are you on food stamps? How much money do you make?
These are just a sample of the highly detailed and personal questions asked in the mandatory American Community Survey the U.S. Census Bureau will send to a sample of some 3 million U.S. households in addition to the 2010 Census.
Refusing to answer the questions or answering them incorrectly will subject citizens to hefty fines.
The U.S. Census website for the American Community Survey warns that under Title 13 of the U.S. Code, Section 221, anyone who refuses to answer the 11-page 48-question survey, or who answers the questions with false information, will be subject to a possible $5,000 fine.
When pressed for an answer to the penalty question, the Census Bureau failed to provide one:
WND has consistently found the Census Department difficult to reach for comment. No media phone number or contact person is published on the home page of the U.S. Census Bureau. By typing, “news” into the Census Bureau homepage search engine, a page displays the phone number 301-763-3030 as the bureau’s Public Information Office. Dialing that number, WND received a recording that directed news reporters to dial yet another number, 301-763-3691. Dialing that number, WND encountered voice mail.
After leaving a request for a call on the voice mail, the Census Bureau Public Information Office neglected to return the call.
Go to the link to see the sort of questions being asked.
Now, why is it we are faced with prosecution for failing to provide personal info yet the Quicker-Fucker-Upper, that Jug-Earred Jackass called Barack HUSSEIN Obama can refuse to show us his birth certificate and college records?
Hmmmm?!?!?!
The waters beneath Taylor’s Glacier are a kind of ancient time capsule where a community of microorganisms was able to develop and evolve in an environment not found anywhere else on Earth. When the lake was trapped under the glacier some 1.5 – 2 million years ago, some simple life forms were trapped in it. The subglacial lake contains no oxygen, but is home to at least 17 different types of microorganisms. The water is hyper-salinated (very salty), and its unusual coloring is due to its high iron content, which instantly rusts upon being exposed to air outside of its closed-in origin, creating the blood red waterfall. The strange and inhospitable conditions in the subglacial lake had led researchers to wonder just how all of those microorganisms could have survived in the extremely cold, airless, completely dark environment for so long.
The comments at Ace’s place are funny. Have a read.
When is 0.9999999(repeating to infinity) equal to 1?
We’ve seen those “infinity” numbers a lot, right? Three divided into ten. Three divided into two. Three divided into one.
That sort of thing.
It implies that number runs into infinity seeking the next higher number but never gets there.
But in this case, there are those that say that .9999 does equaly 1.
Just switch to fractions.
Three into two is .6666 infinity.
Three into one is .3333 infinity.
Add them and you get .9999infinity.
In fractions, though: 2/3 plus 1/3 equals one.
I’ll leave it to you now.
Missouri may have gotten one right this time. There’s a law on the books to give renters tax credits for the rent they pay.
Except: the landlord has to pay taxes.
What does that mean?
That means, for example, that renters living in public housing do not qualify for the tax credit.
The Columbia Daily Tribune reported Monday that state tax officials say there now is greater recognition that the law requires landlords to pay property taxes for renters to get the tax break.
Brenda Procter, a personal finance specialist at the University of Missouri, said the eligibility interpretation for earning the tax credit is new. Procter said it could leave thousands of low-income and disabled people living in tax-exempt housing without money that they have relied upon in the past.
Time to get off the government tit, mofos! Get a job. Or another job. If you’re disabled, sorry. But if you’re capable of spending money you should be able to find a way to make it. If you can’t I am certain there are other ways some government worker will find to rape ME for it.
[KICKIN' AND SCREAMIN'……….. is proudly powered by WordPress.]