Tweets by @StanfordSports

I'm getting the sense that people want to know more about @StanfordMSoccer's sports bras. Will have to look into doing a story on them.: 5 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
@carrera993red the bras hold each player's heart rate monitor and mileage tracker: 5 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @alexaphilippou: Asked Gunn a little while ago if the title had sunken in yet. "No, not really.": 9 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
By the way: Stanford swept offensive and defensive tourney MVP awards. Offensive MVP = Morris Defensive MVP = Vincent: 11 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
"It was awesome... He's a special soccer player and a special human being as well." -Gunn on Morris' performance.: 11 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @alexaphilippou: Verso on his goal, ripping off jersey: "Probably not the best look w/ the sports bra underneath...I was just so happy I…: 11 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
Fun fact: Stanford held its opponents scoreless throughout the ENTIRE College Cup. That's 200 minutes.: 11 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports

Fisher: Stanford survives scare, braces for monumental Oregon tilt

Stanford football just refuses to make things easy on its fans.

While I certainly won’t try to draw up negative long-term implications of Saturday’s win against Oregon State coming down to the final seconds (there are none), it did teach me a valuable life lesson: My heart won’t be able to take being too emotionally attached to Stanford football for 50 years.

Somehow the Cardinal turned an 11-point lead with a spectacular defense playing perhaps its best football all season into a heart-attack-inducing last four plays. This time, it wasn’t due to play-calling errors; it was just a lack of execution.

Senior running back Tyler Gaffney had a spectacular night, but his fumble gave the Beavers new life. Then, with 3,000 pounds of bulk in the game, Stanford couldn’t pick up a yard against a defensive front that it had been abusing all game. Fortunately for Gaffney, the Cardinal offense and any Stanford fan looking forward to a potential BCS vacation again this January, the defense stepped up again to save the day.

So, now that we’ve all had some time to bring our heart rate back to normal, it’s time to reflect on what we learned from Saturday and what that means for the matchup with Oregon in 10 days.

To go back even earlier than the start of Stanford’s game at Oregon State, Oregon’s home win against UCLA about an hour down the road in Eugene had some interesting takeaways that could be very beneficial to the Cardinal’s chances.

Amazingly enough, the Ducks actually looked beatable for 30 minutes against the Bruins. UCLA dominated play for much of the first half and probably should have been winning by seven or more points. Poor play by UCLA quarterback Brett Hundley and a great fake punt by Oregon were the only things that kept the Ducks close.

After halftime, however, Oregon pulled away to win decisively. While some may think that is a bad sign, I think that actually is good for Stanford. Oregon still hasn’t won a close game in its last two seasons — its only close game came against Stanford in 2012 and we all know how that ended — so I’m not sure if the Ducks truly believe they can pull out a tough win. It’s better for the Cardinal that the Ducks couldn’t overcome that hurdle in advance.

In the hours following Oregon’s win against UCLA, Stanford’s defense reminded me why I predicted the Cardinal to go undefeated this season in the first place. Ever since the end of Stanford’s loss to Utah, the Cardinal defense has been spectacular in pretty much every way. Stanford has shut down a UCLA dual-threat attack and an explosive Oregon State passing game, and that’s while battling a lot of injuries up front.

If fifth-year senior defensive end Ben Gardner can heal enough to be a factor against Oregon, I really think Stanford’s defense can repeat what it did in 2012. In Saturday’s win against Oregon State, Stanford showed everything a great defense needs to do to stop a great offense: tackle well, get pressure on the quarterback with or without the blitz and play good coverage in the secondary. If not for Stanford’s abysmal offensive performance, the Cardinal probably would’ve kept OSU, one of the highest-scoring teams in the country, under 10 points. That is impressive.

And while, on offense, Stanford did not play well enough to beat Oregon, I’m not sure that is entirely a bad thing. Sitting in the postgame press conference with Gaffney, head coach David Shaw and junior quarterback Kevin Hogan, I was amazed at how angry Stanford’s offensive-minded players and coaches were after pulling out the win. Yes, they were thrilled to beat Oregon State, but Hogan and Gaffney were disgusted at themselves, with Shaw not much more positive.

Stanford didn’t need a confidence boost; I know for a fact that everyone in the locker room thinks that Stanford should beat Oregon. This sloppy offensive performance against Oregon State looks like it will instead provide a tremendous amount of motivation to Hogan and the offense to get better every single play leading up to next Thursday, and that certainly can’t hurt.

So while Stanford squandered an opportunity to let its fans fall asleep without heartburn, it did set itself up perfectly to have its best chance of knocking off the Ducks. The buildup is here. Let’s enjoy these 10 days.

Sam Fisher’s blood pressure reached 180 over 110 during Saturday night’s game. Recommend him a cardiologist at safisher ‘at’ stanford.edu, and follow him on Twitter @SamFisher908.

About Sam Fisher

Sam Fisher is the managing editor of sports for The Stanford Daily's Vol. 244. Sam also does play-by-play for KZSU's coverage of Stanford football, Stanford baseball and Stanford women's basketball. In 2013, Sam co-authored "Rags to Roses: The Rise of Stanford Football," with Joseph Beyda and George Chen.
  • VTDuck

    Sam, as for your comment that UCLA should have been up on Oregon, keep in mind that their only two scores in the game came from Oregon turnovers, thus a short field. The Duck defense dominated them pretty convincingly. I do expect you guys to give us a much tougher battle, so good luck. Just not too good.

  • Jbeser

    I read with interest your article about Stanford’s game Saturday night and how a sure thing turned into a thriller. What you fail no note is that this is a recurring theme with Stanford.
    Unfortunately, it has nothing to do with the players and everything to do with the Coach and/or Offensive coordinator.

    Cases in point :

    1. Why the heck did they punt with a minute or so left on 4th and a couple of inches around midfield ??? Can the mighty Stanford “ogre” line not gain 2 inches and seal the game. Instead they got lucky not to get tied…Idiotic
    2. Earlier in the game , he brings in a rookie QB for no good reason with Stanford about to score….QB fumble….Oregon State scores soon thereafter.
    3. Against Utah, late in the game with Gaffney running at will. Second and 4 to go on the 7 yard line of Utah….Three idiotic pass plays in a row…Lost game….Idiotic !!
    4. Earlier in the season, he pulls the first offense team when leading big…Ineffective QB…Tired defense…Has to bring back first team late to burn clock and save win..Idiotic
    5. Last year against Notre Dame…Late in game ( maybe even OT, not sure) Three or four runs up the middle from 1 yard line against number one defensive line in Country..Loss on downs..Lost game…Idiotic
    6. The previous year in Fiesta Bowl with team driving quickly under Luck’ s accurate passing..Shaw slows down offense to set up a LONG field goal attempt by a very shaky Williamson..Missed FG , lost game…Idiotic

    I am a Stanford alumnus and avid Football fan but I believe that Shaw may be a nice guy and good manager, but he is a HORRIBLE tactician and decision maker.

    The team wins in spite of his idiotic decisions, more suited for academic experimenting than for high probability of win play selections.

    I say: Get rid of him NOW !!! Or leave the decision making to someone else…

    Jacques Beser
    714 290 3126
    Jbeser @ cox.net

  • Alvin

    Sam