Tweets by @StanfordSports

Crazy, but true: Today marked the first time in College Cup history that both semifinals have been scoreless at the end of regulation.: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @alexaphilippou: "I can walk you through what I remember." -Epstein when asked to walk media through ups and downs of PKs: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
Stanford will take on Clemson this Sunday at 11am PT.: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
Mis-tweet before: Stanford is playing in its first NATIONAL TITLE game since 2002: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
Final penalty kick score: 8-7.: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
Stanford is headed to its first College Cup since 2002. All Right Now is playing in Sporting Park!: 4 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports

Tuteja: I’m picking Pacquiao

This Saturday marks the most anticipated fight in the history of televised boxing. This Saturday, we’ll see the undefeated and 47-0 Floyd Mayweather Jr. take on arguably the greatest pound-for-pound boxer of all time in Manny Pacquiao. This Saturday, we’ll have an answer to the question we’ve been asking for five weeks: Who is the greatest boxer of the past decade?

And those are just the boxing headlines. Consider the fact that the fight could generate over $400 million in revenue and just crossed the $14 million mark in sponsorships. Pretty remarkable when you consider that the previous “fight of all fights” in 2007 between Oscar De La Hoya and Mayweather only generated $130 million in revenue by comparison.

Leading up to this match, casual boxing fans like myself have started to pay closer attention to the sport. Both Mayweather and Pacquiao have hit the media circuit to promote the fight and to shed light on their own personal backgrounds and motivations for boxing. As the anticipation for the fight builds up, here are my thoughts on what we have to look forward to.

Oddsmakers have Mayweather as a significant favorite going into the fight, and I think that’s for good reason. After all, Mayweather has the “home-field advantage” at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas — so much so, in fact, that Pacquiao isn’t even staying at the hotel before the fight (you have to wonder, too, if the fight goes to a decision, how much home-field advantage might influence the judges.)

Moreover, Mayweather has never lost a fight, whereas Pacquiao has struggled with his confidence inside the ring in the past few years. For instance, he dropped two fights in 2012, and although the loss to Timothy Bradley was highly controversial and later avenged, the knockout to Juan Manuel Marquez must still be fresh in his mind. Even more, with the exception of the rematch with Bradley in April 2014, Pacquiao’s last few fights have not been against opponents anywhere close to Mayweather’s caliber.

However, despite all of this, I’m picking Pacquiao. Here’s why.

Firstly, Mayweather has had a long history of struggling with left-handed fighters, and we all know that Pacquiao is one of the best left-handed boxers ever.

As Shane Mosely — who has fought both Mayweather and Pacquiao in the last five years — told ESPN, “Floyd has a problem with southpaws before. Mayweather likes to lean over to his right side, and Pacquiao likes to throw the left hand down the pipe, and maybe that happens. He has a great straight left hand.”

Anyone who has watched Mayweather knows that he is an all-time great counterpuncher with exceptionally quick hand and foot speed. However, Mayweather’s shiftiness in the ring and his leans away from Pacquiao punches could expose him to a left-handed Pacquiao cross.

I think Pacquiao has the ability to knock Mayweather down early in the fight and make things interesting.

Mayweather has always shown a tremendous ability to evade hits and rarely is even scratched during matches. Pacquiao applying pressure with left-handed crosses could put Mayweather in unfamiliar territory, which would immediately give Pacquiao the advantage.

Secondly, Pacquiao fights with an aggressive control that few other boxers have. In my opinion, beating Floyd Mayweather is about balancing aggression and the ability to simply hang with him during the fight.

Some fighters in the past have come out swinging for the KO immediately, which is not a very effective strategy against Mayweather (see the Miguel Cotto vs. Mayweather fight). Mayweather is in incredibly good shape and is very skilled at anticipating punches, which is why this type of strategy just wears out the aggressive boxer and results in Mayweather winning by decision.

On the other hand, some fighters attempt to counterpunch with Mayweather, which I think is equally as unwise (see the Jose Luis Castillo vs. Mayweather fight or the Juan Manuel Marquez fight against Mayweather). While some might argue that Castillo should have won his fight against Mayweather, Mayweather has only improved his counterpunching and showed his dominance at the style more recently against Marquez.

Rather, I think Pacquiao and world-renowned trainer Freddie Roach will come up with a game plan that plays to Pacquiao’s strengths. Pacquiao has great footwork inside the ring and is a very fit boxer. Also, he punches much harder than Mayweather. I look for Pacquiao to attempt to set the tone early but also to be wise about when he tries to be aggressive.

Pacquiao has already had experience paying the price of leaving himself exposed to crosses (see the 2012 Marquez vs. Pacquiao KO), and I think that Pacquiao will use that experience to avoid repeating the same mistakes against Floyd and remain “on his toes.” While I think the fight lasting 12 rounds gives a huge advantage to Mayweather, Pacquiao’s best play is to wear Mayweather down and go for the KO in rounds 10-12.

Lastly, I think Oscar De La Hoya captured my feelings well when he told ESPN, “My head goes with Mayweather, my heart is with Pacquiao.” Pacquiao gave up a lot to make this fight happen, as he is making significantly less money than Mayweather and agreed to Mayweather’s preferred location.

I don’t think that Pacquiao would have agreed to the fight if he were not extremely motivated to give everything he had, and I think this fight means more to Pacquiao than it does to Mayweather, especially given his recent struggles in the ring. For Pacquiao, this is a chance to cement his legacy as the greatest of the era, despite having five losses in his career.

I think that with Mayweather’s undefeated record, people have forgotten that the greatest boxers of all time had multiple losses over the courses of their careers. Mayweather’s spotless record certainly does not mean he is the greatest boxer ever, in my opinion, but rather, it reflects the shift how opponents are selected and the frequency of fights — but that’s a conversation for another time.

In short, I’ve always enjoyed rooting for the underdogs in sports, and Pacquiao certainly seems like much more of an underdog now than he would have if this fight had happened five years ago. Pacquiao seems incredibly motivated for the fight, and he even recorded his own song to play as his walk-out music. While some may say that I merely want Pacquiao to win, rather than actually believe he could win, I think his boxing style poses unfamiliar challenges to Mayweather that could result in Mayweather’s first loss.

Despite his thorough knowledge of statistical analytics, Shawn Tuteja knows the best way to pick a boxing match is based on which way a fighter leans. Contact Shawn at sstuteja ‘at’ stanford.edu.

About Shawn Tuteja

Shawn Tuteja is a senior studying mathematics and statistics. He serves as the color commentator of KZSU 90.1 FM's coverage of the Stanford football team and the play-by-play announcer for men's basketball broadcasts. Hailing from the great state of Alabama, Shawn grew up an avid fan of college football and has written feature articles and columns on a wide range of Stanford sports. Contact him at sstuteja 'at' stanford.edu
  • istambaylang

    nice piece…

  • Dranreb Datsboygym

    SHAWN TUTEJA what a remarkable article you made it….my only question straight to your personality as a person is…for how long can you stand your point of view towards the members of BWAA RING MAGAZINE ESPN SPORTS ILLUSTRATED and most of all…the entriguing American Boxing writer KEVIN LOLE for saying rescently that both Floyd and Manny doesnt even belong in the Top 20 greatest fighter of all time??? you are an AMERICAN mr Shawn, and being an american the worlds may understand that when we talk about EGO and PRIDE the americans never ever likes to surrender nor bow to any country…how can you stand your point that PACQUIAO arguablly the Greatest P4P fighter of all time?? can you tell that to all members of soooo fanatic blinded eyes of most of your fellow countryman from BWAA? many times i already told what is the exact basis or measurement for us as a fan of Boxing to admit to our selves if who is the real and true Greatest Fighter Of All Time without any single feelings of being BIASED? where did you stand mr TUTEJA? in the QUANTITY of ROBINSONs defining carrer? of the QUALITY of opponents PACQUIAO had fought? is the number winning record of ROBINSON is much more greater? or the 57 winning fights of MANNY that captures the unprecedented 8TH DIVISIONs and first ever human being to gain 4TH LINEAL world champ in 10 world title belt championships? and mr SHAWN? from your mathematical background…Did fighting INSIDE OF YOUR OWN BACKYARD is more greater than a Man choose to fights OUTSIDE OF HIS OWN BACKYARD? based on my observations…most of American Boxing Historian and writers doesnt like the idea of digging deeper and to conduct unbiased study comparing the legacy of Robinson vs Pacquiao, all they chooce is from thier wildly imaginations that only SRR is the greatest of them all..iam looking for any boxing writer that have the guts to stand what exactly the real essence of the word: GREATNESS!!!

  • Dranreb Datsboygym

    @ SHAWN, if MANNY beats Floyd on saturday eve, Sunday morning in the Philippines and the rest of SouthEast Asia, He will broked his own Historical world record by becoming the only HUMAN BEING who captured 8TH DIVISIONs and 5TH LINEAL in 13 world championships!!! and if the members of BWAA arent goin to be biased? im sure PACQUIAOs winning in the foreign land far away from his native land was a clear testament and enough evidence for MANNY legacy surpassing the only 2 Divisions title in 127 pro fights of Sugar Ray Robinson…Mr Tuteja…im not really sure if you aggree to stand my point as the very first ever Robinsons fight Abroad in England was nothin but humilation on his behalf by taste of defeat from the hands of not popular Randy Turpin…secondly, I saw the video tape of Robinson vs Carmen basilio and its hard to believed that a midget Basilio fought toe to toe to the much more taller Robinson the feat that impossible for PAC to happened where 95% of MANNYs opponents was by far bigger than him…theres a lot of strong basis for every one of us to vote who exactly much more greater but if smaller Basilio can beats up taller Robinson how much more the likes of MANNY who is considered the greatest southpaw fighter of all time, plus the fact that the footwork and great movement and ackward angles of bunches of punches will surely giving hell even in the class level of great Robinson..still, If PACQUIAO be able to beat Floyd on saturday i just hope the American fans will acknowledge MANNY as the greatest fighter ever maybe its unacceptable for some but lets take a look based on the record that has PAC did to Re Write Boxing History World Wide.

  • Mark Jennings

    that’s not a nice piece, he said that he’s going for Manny, then later in the article said heagrees with Oscar dela Hoya that his heart is with Manny but his head picks mayweather, pretty stupid and that’s exactly why he analyze college football

  • OneWish

    I am with you on this one Dranreb. I just can’t get how they judged SRR as the greatest fighter of all time, if that is based on how many fights he had which is almost 200 then he is hands down winner, but they failed to dissect the quality of opponents he had. He was even beaten by boxers with a dismal record of about 20 losses! If Pacman will fight with pattsies as SRR has done just to pad his record then he can easily beat that 200! but he didn’t, he chose to fight only the best, I can see only 5 opponents of Manny with more that 10 losses, other than that most are undefeated and the best at their class. The same goes to Henry Armstrong who was once beaten by a boxer with 24 losses already, how can he be great and at number 2? is that because he also fought a lot? How can Pernell Whitaker be greater than Manny, at what basis? He had a draw with JCC who is not anywhere on the list! There is an endless accomplishment by Manny that dwarfed those names before him on the list even Mayweather who had a decision with ODH, Cotto and Mosley and you know what Manny did to them. The only 8 weightclass champion in history, how can you beat that? Isn’t that enough for him to be in the top 3 at least? What I want to address is examine not just the number of fights a boxer made but the quality of opponents they fought. Also have a look at how the boxer progressed on each weight class and Manny was exemplary on all of those, 8 times and nobody can beat that.

  • OneWish

    I just can’t get how they judged SRR as the greatest fighter of all time, if that is based on how many fights he had which is almost 200 then he is hands down winner, but they failed to dissect the quality of opponents he had. He was even beaten by boxers with a dismal record of about 20 losses! If Pacman will fight with pattsies as SRR has done just to pad his record then he can easily beat that 200! but he didn’t, he chose to fight only the best, I can see only 5 opponents of Manny with more that 10 losses, other than that most are undefeated and the best at their class. The same goes to Henry Armstrong who was once beaten by a boxer with 24 losses already, how can he be great and at number 2? is that because he also fought a lot? How can Pernell Whitaker be greater than Manny, at what basis? He had a draw with JCC who is not anywhere on the list! There is an endless accomplishment by Manny that dwarfed those names before him on the list even Mayweather who had a decision with ODH, Cotto and Mosley and you know what Manny did to them. The only 8 weightclass champion in history, how can you beat that? Isn’t that enough for him to be in the top 3 at least? What I want to address is examine not just the number of fights a boxer made but the quality of opponents they fought. Also have a look at how the boxer progressed on each weight class and Manny was exemplary on all of those, 8 times and nobody can beat that.