OPINIONS

Evolution, not revolution

November 4, 2008 changed my life. It showed me that someone like me, born from two worlds, with two identities, divergent from “traditional” America, could become the most powerful person in the world. It showed me that an upstart politician with little experience can become president of the United States: It showed me the power of a good campaign. That night, I began rearranging my high school course schedule. I shifted units from the “hard” sciences to the “soft” sciences, from chemistry to government — a prologue to be fulfilled at Stanford.

But that night didn’t just change my life; it changed millions of Americans’ too. President Obama’s flagship legislation has ensured healthcare coverage for more than 11 million people. It has helped more Americans than any healthcare law since Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society legislation 50 years ago.

With this preamble, it should surprise no one that one of the first things I did at Stanford was start organizing around the 2012 election. In fact, I nearly skipped NSO to attend OFA’s (President Obama’s reelection team) grassroots organizing boot camp.

Although I delayed that training while I settled in on campus, my freshman and sophomore years laid in the shadow of that election. With a team of people like Natasha Patel, Eric Mattson and Sara Orton, OFA-Stanford dialed phone calls to nearly 50,000 voters in Nevada and Colorado. We sent 25 students to knock on doors in Reno. 100 different students came out to our Get Out the Vote rally.

Though Obama’s second term might have seemed guaranteed on a college campus in a state as liberal as California, campaigning for the 2012 election mattered as much as winning in 2008 did. Imagine if a Republican had won: Those 11 million citizens likely wouldn’t have health insurance. Imagine if Mitt Romney were president during Ferguson, or the countless other shootings this year. (As a counterfactual, look at what other Republican leaders said). Obama hasn’t been perfect, but the progressive agenda is in better hands now than had we lost in either 2008 or 2012.

In pushing that agenda, the ballot box was our best tool.

So, it surprised me when, at an Alternative Spring Break training, I heard a progressive say that voting was not a form of public service and that they would not do it. It surprised me even more when I heard another progressive imply the need for revolution because the democratic process hasn’t yet fully eliminated discrimination.

As progressives, by definition, change is our desired outcome (as contrasted with conservatives, who prefer the status quo). But, non-participation in the political system only ensures that the progress we seek will not be achieved.

If we are going to “resist,” let’s resist for voting rights.

The same people who seek to maintain the social, economic and racial stratification of America seek to deprive minority, low-income and young citizens of their right to vote. In 2008, 5.3 million people could not vote due to a felony conviction and in four states, felons and ex-felons permanently lose their right to vote. Given that African-Americans males receive sentences 20 percent longer than white males who committed similar crimes, it’s unsurprising that more than a quarter of those 5.3 million were African-American males. At the same time, 33 states now have voter identification laws that require photo ID; the Government Accountability Office found that this significantly reduced turnout, especially among African-Americans.

Voting is the civil rights issue of our day because it is the key to addressing our other grievances.

In my final year at Stanford, I was so proud to see so much political discussion and activity. I now urge you to direct that organization and energy toward the 2016 election, regardless of whether that means supporting the campaign of Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris or Keith Ellison. Inaction is complicity in the status quo; participation is the first step to progress.

To paraphrase the Beatles, if you say you want a revolution, you can count me out; if you say you want (political) evolution, you can count me in.

Nicholas Karim Ahamed

Contact Nicholas Ahamed at nahamed ‘at’ stanford.edu.

About Nick Ahamed

Nick Ahamed is the Desk Editor of The Stanford Daily Editorial Board. He was Managing Editor of Opinions for Volume 246 and previously served as a political columnist. He is a senior from Minneapolis, Minn. majoring in Political Science. Contact him at nahamed 'at' stanford.edu.
  • rogerclegg

    Re “felons and ex-felons permanently lose their right to vote”: Of course, there’s no such things as an “ex-felon,” and it’s also misleading to say that, in any state, the loss of the right to vote is “permanent,” since there is always an administrative mechanism for restoring the right to vote. And that, in my opinion, is the best approach: If you aren’t willing to follow the law
    yourself, then you can’t demand a role in making the law for everyone else,
    which is what you do when you vote. The
    right to vote can be restored to felons, but it should be done carefully, on a
    case-by-case basis after a person has shown that he or she has really turned
    over a new leaf, not automatically on the day someone walks out of prison. After all, the unfortunate truth is that most
    people who walk out of prison will be walking back in. Read more about this issue on our website
    here [ http://www.ceousa.org/voting/voting-news/felon-voting/538-answering-the-challenges-to-felon-disenfranchisement ] and our congressional testimony here: [ http://judiciary.house.gov/_files/hearings/pdf/Clegg100316.pdf
    ].

  • Derwood Kirby

    “… 33 states now have voter identification laws that require photo ID; the Government Accountability Officefound that this significantly reduced turnout, especially among African-Americans.” Yo! Nicholas!!! Who is it that’s standing in the way of voter ID? It’s the Democrat Party. Why are they afraid of voter ID? You have to have an ID for
    anything else you do in this country. You can’t rent a hotel room. You can’t
    rent a car, can’t buy a car. Take everyday things in life that you must have
    been a photo ID for, and yet when it comes to voting that’s gonna lead to voter
    fraud? So you don’t want voter ID, but you have plenty of ID to
    show for EBT, credit cards, debit cards, writing a check, at a social security
    office, joining the US military, or any law enforcement agency, college, a pawn
    shop, going to court, the DMV, will call tickets, picking up mail at the USPS,
    UPS or Fedex, test-driving a car, any traffic stop, getting a credit check,
    cashing checks, entering a hospital, donating blood, picking up a prescription
    at a pharmacy, getting a library card at a public library, getting past
    security at any corporation, renting a car, or any athletic equipment, taking
    the ACT/SAT exams for college, taking the bar exam, CPA exam, medical boards,
    buying or selling real estate, getting any professional license, getting a
    hunting or fishing license; applying for food stamps or housing; applying for
    social security and Medicare, seeing an R rated movie, buying a gun, applying
    for most jobs, picking up your own kids from public school, renting tools from
    a hardware store, getting married, applying for a passport, seeing a doctor,
    renting a hotel room, redeeming a lottery ticket, renting an apartment, filling
    out and submitting an I-9 tax form (actually TWO forms of ID required),
    returning merchandise at many retail stores, getting a membership at a gym
    (many locations), renting a videogame with an MA rating, picking up items at a
    store purchased online, paying a cable bill, camping at a state park
    campground, getting on an Amtrak train, buying lighters, sharpies, spray paint,
    super glue, nyquil, any type of gasoline additive, knives, sudafed, lawn
    fertilizer, credit card purchases, cigarettes, buying liquor, flying at any US
    airport, entering the White House or military base, entering the National Press
    Club Journalism Awards Dinner, etc, etc, etc…

  • webattorney

    Obamacare is nothing more than some people subsidizing other people’s health care. I am not saying it is a bad thing, but it hurts most middle class families IMO.

  • mrthecoolguy

    What a sad mind to inhabit