Tweets by @StanfordSports

RT @alexaphilippou: I wrote this 2 months ago but it seems even more fitting now, as @StanfordMSoccer plays in 1st College Cup since '02 ht…: 6 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @dohyoungpark: It's official: No. 6 @StanfordFball will face No. 5 Iowa in the 102nd Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual. (J…: 4 days ago, StanfordDaily Sports

Stanford offense implodes in ugly loss to Northwestern
Fifth-year senior quarterback Kevin Hogan (right) was 20-of-35 in his return to the field as the Cardinal only mustered 240 yards of offense in an ugly 16-6 defeat to Northwestern. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Stanford offense implodes in ugly loss to Northwestern

For around eight minutes on Saturday, Stanford looked every bit the part of the dark-horse College Football Playoff contender that many around the country were pegging it as.

But for the next 52 minutes, No. 21 Stanford (0-1) was simply outmatched, outcoached and outplayed by a Northwestern (1-0) team that was a double-digit underdog at home. The Wildcats did not allow Stanford to reach the end zone as they cruised to an ugly yet comfortable 16-6 victory, Stanford’s first season-opening loss since 2007.

“We didn’t give ourselves a chance to win,” said head coach David Shaw. “They played well and were well-prepared, and we thought we were well-prepared, but it didn’t show.”

After Stanford drove 64 yards easily before stalling on its first offensive drive and forced Northwestern into a three-and-out on its first defensive drive, Stanford couldn’t regain its footing on offense until the fourth quarter. Meanwhile, Northwestern did just enough to stay out of reach after making some adjustments.

Although Stanford was driving down 16-6 with time running out into the fourth quarter, fifth-year senior quarterback Kevin Hogan threw an interception to backup safety Kyle Queiro on a fade to Austin Hooper in the end zone, sealing the game for Northwestern.

Stanford was outgained on offense 330-240 and had a paltry 88 yards at halftime, when the Wildcats took a 10-3 lead into the locker room. The Northwestern lead was never more than 10 points, but it felt like a blowout all the way through as the Wildcats moved the ball effectively and Stanford stalled time after time.

Sophomore Christian McCaffrey (right) was Stanford's leading rusher with 68 yards. Although McCaffrey and the Stanford offense moved the ball well on their first drive, they didn't see any more success until the fourth quarter. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Sophomore Christian McCaffrey (right) was Stanford’s leading rusher with 68 yards. Although McCaffrey and the Stanford offense moved the ball well on their first drive, they didn’t see any more success until the fourth quarter. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Pat Fitzgerald crafted a fantastic game plan that worked to perfection. The option running game to the perimeter kept Stanford off-balance and set up the counter, the inside draw play that Northwestern ran to perfection when Stanford only left three or four men in the box. Fitzgerald made adjustments; Shaw seemingly didn’t, with Stanford running similar route packages that looked to work the middle of the field all game and only stretching the field once or twice.

“I thought our guys came prepared to play an outstanding football team,” Fitzgerald said. “We really stuck to our plan.”

The Wildcats ran wild behind stud sophomore running back Justin Jackson and redshirt freshman quarterback Clayton Thorson, whose option running game kept Stanford off-balance all afternoon and ate away at swaths of yardage. Jackson finished the game with 134 yards on 28 carries, while Thorson rushed for 68 yards with his eight carries.

While Stanford reached the ball-carriers quickly on most of those runs, missed tackles — grossly uncharacteristic for a Stanford team — allowed Jackson and Thorson to keep plays alive and make something out of nothing.

“We just need to look at the film to see exactly what we need to fix,” said fifth-year senior linebacker Blake Martinez, who led the Cardinal with 14 tackles. “Obviously, we missed tackles that were there, so we need to fix those and work on that stuff and kind of work on the overall execution of each play, like knowing where your gaps are, who is your help, and everything.”

And when Thorson wasn’t keeping Stanford off-balance on the ground, he looked nothing like a freshman making his first career start and every bit a poised, experienced college quarterback when attacking through the air.

Although Thorson was just 12-of-24 for 105 yards, the boxscore doesn’t come close to telling the whole story. He looked extremely comfortable operating the option running game, and although he was wild on a few throws, he only once made an ill-advised throw: a ball directly at Stanford safety Kodi Whitfield in the end zone, who dropped the sure interception.

Otherwise, Thorson’s throws were hard and accurate for the most part, and with Northwestern’s running game keeping Stanford guessing, he was able to remain composed in the pocket even when under pressure and get his throws out and on the money. That helped extend drives where Stanford couldn’t: Northwestern was 12-of-22 on third downs, while Stanford was an embarrassing 3-of-15.

“I talked to [Thorson] earlier in the week about not trying to outplay a fifth-year senior and just doing what we do,” said Northwestern head coach Pat Fitzgerald. “And through that, he outplayed a fifth-year senior.”

Part of Thorson’s success was due to the fact that Stanford was dominated on both lines by Northwestern on Saturday, which was a sight that not even the most homer Northwestern fans or the most downer Stanford fans could have seen coming.

Although Northwestern was replacing two pieces on an offensive line that struggled mightily last season, Stanford just couldn’t get pressure with its defensive line, and the team that was once known for igniting a #PartyInTheBackfield did not record a single sack, even after Northwestern’s starting center was injured and the Wildcats had to shuffle players inside and outside to make up for the loss.

The defensive line also showed a startling lack of lateral mobility and inability to get off blocks, resulting in Northwestern’s success with runs to the perimeter throughout the game.

“I’m really proud of everyone,” Jackson said. “Not only the running backs and wide receivers blocking on the edges — I think our O-linemen, they really showed up today.”

With the line struggling to pressure Thorson and the freshman quarterback throwing darts to his receivers, Stanford couldn’t throw in its aggressive blitz packages and, for the most part, Stanford’s pass rush was a non-factor in the game.

Although the line struggled, the rest of the defense, to its credit, played as well as it could given the circumstances and made some key stops on big plays — and, more importantly, kept the offense in the game.

Sophomore cornerback Alijah Holder (center) and the Stanford secondary had a decent day against Northwestern but weren't helped out by an anemic pass rush that allowed Wildcats quarterback Clayton Thorson to keep the chains moving. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Sophomore cornerback Alijah Holder (center) and the Stanford secondary had a decent day against Northwestern but weren’t helped out by an anemic pass rush that allowed Wildcats quarterback Clayton Thorson to keep the chains moving. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Not that it helped much.

For as large of a step forward Kevin Hogan took at the end of last season, he took an equally large step back against Northwestern.

He was 20-of-35 for 155 yards and a pick, and his game was a lot uglier than the numbers would indicate, despite Shaw saying after the game that Hogan “for the most part played really well.”

His throws were inaccurate and often late, he missed wide-open reads and he returned to his old habits of staring down his receivers and throwing the ball into pockets he shouldn’t have been throwing into.

It also didn’t help that the receivers would drop the good passes that Hogan did put on target. Michael Rector, who sat out the first half in favor of Rollins Stallworth, saw a perfectly placed deep ball fall through his hands, while tight end Dalton Schultz also dropped a late would-be first-down reception.

And Stanford’s offensive line had no answers for a Northwestern defensive line that was utterly dominant in both phases of the game.

After the first drive, the Northwestern line didn’t give Stanford much of anything on the ground — Stanford finished with 85 rushing yards the whole game — and mounted a strong pass rush that pressured Hogan in important situations, and, more importantly, seemed to never really make Hogan comfortable in the pocket.

“I thought there was a dominant performance from our defensive line,” Fitzgerald said. “It looked like we controlled the line of scrimmage on every single play defensive-line-wise.”

In the end, a defense that accounted for a paltry 17 sacks last season brought Hogan down twice. It also forced a fumble from sophomore Christian McCaffrey, who was Stanford’s leading rusher with 68 yards and saw lots of action as a wide receiver as well. McCaffrey, however, effectively became a non-factor after the first quarter as Stanford was forced to throw the ball often to try and play catch-up.

Junior punter Alex Robinson (above) was one of the few bright spots on the field for Stanford. He averaged 46 yards on his seven punts and was very effective in switching field position despite having been locked in a fierce position battle with freshman Jake Bailey through fall camp. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

Junior punter Alex Robinson (above) was one of the few bright spots on the field for Stanford. He averaged 46 yards on his seven punts and was very effective in switching field position despite having been locked in a fierce position battle with freshman Jake Bailey through fall camp. (BOB DREBIN/isiphotos.com)

The lone bright spot of the day for Stanford was on special teams, where senior Conrad Ukropina scored all six points for Stanford on two convincing field goals; junior punter Alex Robinson was arguably the most impressive Cardinal player on the field by averaging 46 yards each on his seven punts; and freshman kickoff specialist Jake Bailey recorded touchbacks on two of his three kickoffs.

Stanford will need to regroup quickly and find answers on offense before it returns to Stanford Stadium for its home opener next Saturday against UCF (0-1), which is coming off of a similarly ugly and shocking loss to Florida International.

“Every team makes mistakes and it’s unfortunate that we made our mistakes so early on,” said senior guard Joshua Garnett. “We still have so much football ahead of us. We have 11 more games… So we have to come together and keep our heads up so we can really keep moving forward.”

Contact Do-Hyoung Park at dhpark ‘at’ stanford.edu.

About Do-Hyoung Park

Do-Hyoung Park '16 is a Managing Editor of Staff Development, lead football writer and copy editor at The Stanford Daily. He also writes about Stanford football for Sports Illustrated's new college football site, Campus Rush. In his three years, he has written primarily football, baseball, soccer, tennis, swimming and water polo, and has covered a Rose Bowl, a Super Regional run and three national championships. Do-Hyoung is a senior that is obnoxiously proud of being from Saint Paul, Minnesota studying chemical engineering and computer science. To contact him, please email him at dpark027 'at' stanford.edu.
  • ADPaterson

    Unfortunately, very well written. We won’t be rated for a while, and in Nov. we likely will be underdog to Cal (Goff & Co put up 73pts on Grambling), for first time since 2008.

  • Jose R

    Stanford played like a bunch of girls. They should have to use a non-gender specific locker room from now on.

  • Stanford Fan

    Shaw is unable to accomodate internal or external critique. His primary downfall. It shows. Repeatedly. God bless Hogan. He took this program to two Rose Bowls and had surmounted great personal challenges. But he has plateaued, if not regressed.

  • Candid One

    Do, this paragraph calls into question about which game you were watching:

    “His throws were inaccurate and often late, he missed wide-open reads and he returned to his old habits of staring down his receivers and throwing the ball into pockets he shouldn’t have been throwing into.”

    When Hogan wasn’t hit as he as throwing, he’d normally throw his receivers open. He’s not a rookie anymore. If he sees coverage on his target, his intent is to place the ball where his receiver has a better chance than the defenders. When that didn’t seem to be the case, replays generally shows that his release as he was receiving contact. His pass protection was miserable.

    NW has one of the best secondaries in B1G but their linebackers showed much better than advertised. With that coverage getting away with many more holds and interference than the refs were calling, the shabby pass protection wasn’t giving Hogan to go to other target. When Hogan had time, he was clearly going through his progressions.

    This was the worst first-game showing by the TWU. Already in the second Stanford series, Murphy and the other TWU began to get beat, and that mostly didn’t improve much during the rest of the game.

    Stanford’s defense did okay. With all of the neophytes, those 16 points weren’t a big deal when the Stanford offense is productive–even by 2012-2013 standards.

    There’s a ton of soul-searching among that offensive line this week. It’s tough to have an offense without them. Shaw’s catching flack for questionable play calling. Hogan’s catching flack for not carrying the team. Both such recriminations are hollow when the NW defensive line clearly outplays the TWU.

  • Jbonz

    The photo used also calls into question the game you guys were watching. Last time I checked northwestern’ colors were not blue and gold. Get a clue.

  • Guest

    This is going to be a long year for the Cardinal and not a good one. Hogan has regressed and the offense was inept with a lot of dropped balls.

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    As has been pointed out elsewhere, it is not unusual for a Pat Fitzgerald-led team to outplay and/or out-coach its opponent. Such phenomena doesn’t signal the end of the season, or the world, despite all the gut-wrenching hand-wringing that’s going on here.
    Know the History :
    From the 1970s to 1994, a quarter century, Northwestern football never, NEVER.. won more than 4 games in a single season. In fact, in the middle of that stretch, their record from 1976-1981 was 3-62-1. Can you imagine ?! 3 wins in 6 years !
    But in 1995, seemingly out of nowhere, MLB Pat Fitzgerald led the Wildcats to an undefeated Big Ten (really 11 back then) season, and the league ‘ship, including a berth in the Rose Bowl, where without Fitz (broken leg) the Catz clawed and scratched, but lost to U$C 41-32.
    It was their first 10 win season in.. like forever…
    Note that with a healthy Fitz at MLB during the regular ssn, the Catz held their opponents to an average of 12.6 ppg ! and only one team scored more than 20pts in a game !!
    Hmmm, does that kind of stifling defense sound somewhat familiar ?
    In 2005, Fitz became head coach of the football team. From ’08 – ’12 Fitz’ Catz went to a NW record, 5 straight bowl games, and eventually won their first bowl in over half a century !
    During the 2013 and ’14 seasons the football team struggled to 5-7 records, at least in part, due to off-field distractions and divisions due to the player’s union case.
    After Saturday’s 6-16 loss, it’s easy to sit back and blame Hogan.. blame Shaw.. blame the play-calling… blame the TWU.. blame blame blame…
    Personally i find it odd that few writers factor in the flight and start-time as something you can’t just overcome because you’re aware of it. It’s a physical disorientation that mental awareness doesn’t necessarily resolve. Few writers have mentioned the muggy heat and humidity. Few writers have mentioned the thick grass and soggy field that can also slow a team down. In all of the above cases, those are factors that the NW players were well-acclimated and used to.
    There is plenty of blame-Hogan going around. But little talk of Rector’s first half suspension, his dropped pass in which he had a couple steps on the defender and a clear path to the end zone. There is little talk of the Cajuste injury factor. And there were other dropped passes, as well – one by Owusu comes to mind. Hogan very well could have been 24 of 35 which is a very respectable 70% completion percentage.
    Meanwhile, Stanford still lacks a power back that can run with authority between the tackles, a back who forces the LBs to line up closer to the LoS with less outside leverage. Under those circumstances it’s not surprising a well-coached D could stifle Stanford’s outside run game, repeatedly registering TFLs – no matter how many times you might want to see Christian McCaffery run the sweep, it just wasn’t happening regularly against that defense.
    In college football, if you can’t run the ball effectively, you’re usually gonna lose.

  • Clayton Martin

    An argument could be made that Shaw is the worst coach in the pac 12…definitely the one doing the least with the most

  • Edly

    I actually thought the offensive line did a good job when McCaffrey was in there. He averaged 5.5 yards per carry, and that includes the perimeter plays that NW easily stuffed. I know they want to spread CM around, but I would consider giving him 20 carries between the tackles. Rector and Cajuste will have to step up, and Hogan has to relax and make quick and accurate throws plus run for first downs.
    As horrible as they looked, they could actually have a 2 loss season if they get their act together.

  • Clayton Martin

    Thanks for the history synonymous of NW glorious gridiron past…

  • Clayton Martin

    No one can credibly argue this is all on Shaw…question is what to do about it???

  • Clayton Martin

    And the O-line should pee sitting down

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    umm Mr Martin, sir.. as recently as 2012, the Fitz-coached NWCatz went 10-3, losing only to Nebraska by 1, Michigan by 7, and Penn St by 11, then they beat a strong SEC team, Mississippi St, in the Gator Bowl, 34-20..(NW’s first bowl win in over half-a century) and that’s just 2.6 years ago, so.. many of the players on that team are still on this year’s NW team, and it seems they still know what it takes to be a winner.. yes ?
    The same holds true for Stanford, but this year’s team must come together around that knowledge, as a team.. and i would venture that none of us here know when that might happen, or even if it will or already has happened..
    ..but in your scenario, it’s all Shaw’s fault, therefore, regardless of his previous 42 wins in 4 years, he must be a bad coach.. and i think someone here even said he’s “the worst” coach in the PAC… lol

  • fidel305

    yep, words never previously uttered — “outcoached by pat fitzgerald”

  • fidel305

    none of this excuses allowing NU to dominate in the trenches. it never does.
    and frankly McCaffrey aint all that. the longer Shaw clings to the mistaken belief that he is, the worse things will be

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    Not that i believe in the rankings, but NW is ranked 23rd by one of ‘m.. hmmm

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    o getta grip guest, one game does not a season make !
    Not only was the heat and humidity hard to overcome, the Pat Fitz-coached NW Wildcatz are a tougher team than you think, especially defensively..
    ..and now after 2 games, we see plenty o’ potential.. i mean, if one could reverse and correct a couple plays, the final vs UCF is 38-0, that’s against a team, with plenty o’ players still on it, that was ranked 10th at the end of the season after beating #6 Baylor, in the Fiesta Bowl, ’bout 20 months ago..

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    “this”…?
    “none of this” ??
    — look.. neither Shaw, nor i, got no need fur none of yur “excuses”..
    so ’nuff of this funniness fidel…
    stick to your schticke ‘n let Shaw handle his, and that’s football. period.
    Meanwhile, CMcC IS a valuable teammate because of the extraordinary effort he puts into every play, and that’s a great model for the team to follow, however i agree that unfortunately CMcC is not an inside-the-tackles power back, uh horse back..
    ..but i think it’ll be very int’resting to see how this team evolves..