Tweets by @StanfordSports

RT @alexaphilippou: I wrote this 2 months ago but it seems even more fitting now, as @StanfordMSoccer plays in 1st College Cup since '02 ht…: 15 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @dohyoungpark: It's official: No. 6 @StanfordFball will face No. 5 Iowa in the 102nd Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual. (J…: 5 days ago, StanfordDaily Sports

Instant replay: What’s a little deception (and tunnel working) among friends?

I like Arizona head coach Rich Rodriguez. I like his defensive coordinator, Jeff Casteel. I think they run a good scheme for the types of athletes that they can recruit. I think that Michigan was wrong to fire Rodriguez for Brady Hoke, I think that Arizona is playing its best football since Dick Tomey was running the show in Tucson and I think that Rodriguez will continue to torment Pac-12 opponents for many years to come.

Also, Stanford beat the daylights out of Arizona last Saturday.

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 8.50.12 PM

Something remarkable about Stanford’s annihilation of Arizona was that although Stanford overwhelmed Arizona by obliterating them on the line of scrimmage, it used different plays than the ones Stanford is used to. Normally, Stanford’s famous for using the Power play as its base run play – where the offensive line creates a hole off-tackle and the backside guard leads the ball-carrier through the hole – but defenses have been relentlessly crashing that hole for a while now. Against teams that are sound against play-action, it’s harder to punish teams that sell out against Power.

How can Stanford respond when its core play is getting stoned again and again? You can run option plays – the speed option, the read-option with power blocking, et cetera – but even though Kevin Hogan’s legs seem to be back in business, Stanford reasonably doesn’t want to expose him to too many hits. You can try to get the ball to the outside, and Stanford did that a lot, but that seems like a waste of an offensive line against an undersized 3-3-5 defense missing star linebacker Scooby Wright.

Let’s take a look at a physical downhill running play that, last Saturday, preyed on Arizona’s worst instincts. The Lead O is very similar to Power in a lot of ways: You have a pulling backside guard, you try to move defenders on the line with overwhelming double-teams and you try to create a good hole for the ball-carrier. Instead of Power, however, the play is designed to generate not an off-tackle run, but an off-center run, and the fullback hits the same hole as the pulling guard.

A lot of coaches dislike calling the Lead O because it means that the team is running straight into the teeth of the defense. Ordinarily I would hate it too – against an aggressive defense, two blockers in the hole won’t save your bacon if the defense can read and react properly. You can have a numerical advantage, but if the nose tackle lies down in the middle of the hole, there’s not much a pulling guard can do. In fact, Lead O is often a recipe for a 2-3 yard gain on first down and a mediocre-to-poor success rate on third and short. But if the defense overcommits to Power, the center of the defensive line becomes a weakness, not a strength.

What’s neat about Lead O is that the similarities of this play actually egg on the defense to read it as if it were Power. In the diagram, the defensive end on the left is actually shaded to the inside tight end’s right to make it easy for him to fill the designated gap for Power. The left tackle and guard combine for a double-team, another key component of Power, and the formation includes a fullback, which would normally block the left defensive end on a Power play. Most importantly, the backside guard is pulling – and that’s the action that alerts linebackers to a Power run. The pulling guard is great for play-action; Stanford shows that it’s also great for deception in the run game, too.

Arizona’s 3-3-5 stack defense gives Stanford small holes in the defensive line to begin with (note that the diagram doesn’t show a 3-3-5 stack – it’s based off a diagram from one of David Shaw’s old coaching clinics), and with double-teams Stanford can make these holes bigger. If Arizona’s linebackers bite on the play and think the run is going off tackle instead of up the middle, then Stanford will have two blockers running downhill against linebackers who are headed in the wrong direction. It’s a good play that constrains defenses’ options without sacrificing physicality. If it’s run at the right moment, defensive backs will be forced to tackle, a dicey proposition for many teams. Even if Stanford only gets 5 yards on the play, sustained 5-yard gains will grind any defense to dust. And of course, it helps that Christian McCaffrey can teleport.

Stanford’s countered overaggression with the Lead O before, most notably in the 2013 Rose Bowl against Wisconsin. Even so, you don’t often see the Lead O rip defenses apart like it did against Arizona – but when it does happen, it’s quite a lot of fun.

Contact Winston Shi at wshi94 ‘at’ stanford.edu.

About Winston Shi

Winston Shi is an opinions and sports columnist and senior staff writer for The Stanford Daily, and was the Managing Editor of Opinions for Volume 245 (February-June 2014). He also sits on The Daily's Editorial Board. He is an coterminal BA/MA student in his senior year from Thousand Oaks, California, studying America's history and foreign policy. In his free time, he likes to read, travel and write about himself in the third person. Contact him at wshi94@stanford.edu.
  • Rob Semmens

    Keep it up, Winston. I love your instant replay series.

  • Varun

    Same here. Great stuff

  • Akil

    Great to see this kind of analysis! Finally starting to understand more of the details.

  • maddogsfavsnpiks

    Love it !
    Towards the latter part of the August public scrimmage you prob’ly recall the run up the middle that Bryce Love made covering about 65 yards, i think untouched, for a TD. It was really well blocked by the left side of the line, mostly 3rd stringers at the time, i’m pretty sure, other than that K. Chryst was the QB. The line surged and had driven their DL counterparts approx. 5 yards off the ball, opening a huge gap center-left, then back to the right into the open field, once the RB got past the LoS.
    From my poor vantage point i couldn’t tell if the RG pulled, i don’t think so, but i do know that Reagan Williams, playing FB, made a key block on LB Sean Barton, that gave Love the space to cut right, juke the CB who was rushing up in run support, and with an impressive burst, break out into the clear, also with the help of Trent Irwin’s downfield block/screening off of the safety.
    i saw that same play run with both Remound Wright and CMcC at RB, earlier, altho neither of them made the decisive cut back to the right once the gaping gap opened for them.
    i asked B. Love about the play after, during the autograph session.
    He said it was just a basic zone read, which would prob’ly mean no pulling guard, altho a “cross-block” action, with the center stepping to his right, engaging the first defender to his right, and the RG stepping around behind him and then up the hole is also possible under certain circumstances.
    Of course, many so-called football fans have no interest in what’s going on along the LoS, not because it isn’t intricately fascinating, entertainingly complex (at least to me), and absolutely crucial to determining who wins and who loses.
    Imo, that’s primarily because the professional media conditions fans to adore the golden boy QB and swoon when he throws and completes “the bomb”.
    In comparison to the crucial action that decides who owns the LoS..? ..talk about boring !
    So thanks for the entertaining and highly informative article Winston.
    PS – RichRod is a punk and a thug. The way he gets in the face of his players, screaming at them, presumably when they make a mistake, is utterly classless, imo. You NEVER see Shaw doing that.