Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Nov;25(6):472-7. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000203.

Limitations of Current AHA Guidelines and Proposal of New Guidelines for the Preparticipation Examination of Athletes.

Author information

1
*Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Standford University, Palo Alto, California; and †Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Medical Center, Palo Alto, California.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the prevalence of athletes who screen positive with the preparticipation examination guidelines from the American Heart Association, the AHA 12-elements, in combination with 3 screening electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria.

DESIGN:

Observational cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

Stanford University Sports Medicine Clinic.

PARTICIPANTS:

Total of 1596 participants, including 297 (167 male; mean age, 16.2 years) high school athletes, 1016 (541 male; mean age, 18.8 years) collegiate athletes, and 283 (mean age, 26.3 years) male professional athletes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Athletes were screened using the 8 personal and family history questions from the AHA 12-elements. Electrocardiograms were obtained for all participants and interpreted using Seattle criteria, Stanford criteria, and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations.

RESULTS:

Approximately one-quarter of all athletes (23.8%) had at least 1 positive response to the AHA personal and family history elements. High school and college athletes had similar rates of having at least 1 positive response (25.9% vs 27.4%), whereas professional athletes had a significantly lower rate of having at least 1 positive response (8.8%, P < 0.05). Females reported more episodes of unexplained syncope (11.4% vs 7.5%, P = 0.017) and excessive exertional dyspnea with exercise (11.1% vs 6.1%, P = 0.001) than males. High school athletes had more positive responses to the family history elements when compared with college athletes (P < 0.05). The percentage of athletes who had an abnormal ECG varied between Seattle criteria (6.0%), Stanford criteria (8.8%), and ESC recommendations (26.8%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Many athletes screen positive under current screening recommendations, and ECG results vary widely by interpretation criteria.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

In a patient population without any adverse cardiovascular events, the currently recommended AHA 12-elements have an unacceptably high rate of false positives. Newer screening guidelines are needed, with fewer false positives and evidence-based updates.

PMID:
25915146
DOI:
10.1097/JSM.0000000000000203
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer
Loading ...
Support Center