Turning the Beat Around

It’s a chilly, fall Monday evening, and most Stanford students can be found pent up in the library or eating dinner in a quiet dining hall—that is, except for a cohort of students jumping up and down, doing the pelvic thrust in time to Styx’s “Blue Collar Man.”

Welcome to the typical weekly Leland Stanford Junior University Marching Band (LSJUMB) rehearsal. Bright-orange earplugs are issued to the members trickling in, and a small whiteboard lists the agenda for the day scrawled in green dry-erase marker: “Ignorance, Lovecats, Uptight, Frankenstein…etc.”

Saxophone players in the Leland Stanford Junior University Marching Band (LSJUMB) claim the field, grooving to upbeat tunes. (Courtesy of Alvaro Ponce)

The typical warm-up exercise involves losing one’s shoes and grooving with instruments as if they are dance partners while the Band familiarizes itself with old songs. The “Clairpicks” section even strikes up a kick-line.

Some read their music off traditional stands, but many just mimic others around them, not really caring if they play out of tune. As Arianna Vogel ’14 nonchalantly put it after admitting she has no idea how to play her trombone, “You have to learn not to care that you’re making a fool out of yourself.”

To say the least, this is not a typical college band rehearsal. In fact, compared with any traditional marching band, the Stanford Band could very well be construed as utter chaos.

Discipline and dignity may seem like the natural pillars of a marching band, but the LSJUMB is just plain fun. After all, it’s run by Stanford students for the sheer purpose of entertaining other Stanford students.

Peter “Shotgun” McDonald, the Tööbz Sexion Leader for the Band, described how the LSJUMB sees its role.

“There is a lot of arbitrary following of authority and doing what you’re told in the marching band process,” said McDonald, who is also a Daily columnist. ”And at more academically prestigious universities like Stanford, people see through the authority and see that their purpose is to entertain.”

And entertain they do. From the traditional Band Run to its quirky halftime shows, the Band captures all the suppressed energy Stanford students have building under the surface of their otherwise academically oriented lives.

So how did the LSJUMB get to be so wild? Apparently, the Band was once as reverent as its full name suggests, until a restructuring of the music department in 1963 resulted in the dismissal of the then- director Jules Schucat. To protest what it saw as an injustice, the Band went on strike and refused to play at the first two football games of 1963.

Finally, Schucat’s replacement, Arthur P. Barnes, thought of a compromise to get the Band back on the field: Barnes would allow the Band to be a student-run organization and the Band would play at football games again. The freewheeling 1960s plus the student direction of the Band gave it the rambunctious spirit it still has today.

The 1960s rebirth of the LSJUMB is still seen in both the pictures on the wall the Band Shak and the alumni who come to jam with the band every so often. And as the Band’s faculty advisor, John Giancarlo, said over the deafening roar of “Turn the Beat Around,” “This year the Band is better musically than ever before.” Half the Band members openly admitted they started Band not being able to read sheet music.

Despite its cult-like mystique, the Band offers a tight-knit community where any Stanford student who wants to be a musician can be considered one. As junior Kevin “Yogi” Fischer put it, “Anybody can rock out.”

  • Snowball IV

    So I have a really close friend in band, and I think there are a few factual errors in this article.

    – “Clairpicks” is an egregious misspelling of “Clarpicz”
    – I assume that by “entertain students” you mean “bring the funk to students”
    – ask DAPER about “arbitrarily following authority”
    – “John Giancarlo” is usually known as Giancarlo Aquilanti, a fact which is easily found on by looking up music department faculty.
    – They don’t consider you a musician until you learn how to play something.

  • Beeper

    The band is not as creative, entertaining or innovative as it used to be. The music quliaty is also noticably bad. Too bad, used to be one of the best parts of Stanford football. I’ll take the better football over the band any day.

  • GLS

    This article contains a lot of total drivel. A) You make it out like the band doesn’t work on any music, ignoring the hours that the drum major and section leaders put into rehearsing the band every week, both on monday nights and in section rehearsals. People practice the music a lot on their own. And while the band may not always sound the tightest on everything it plays, note that the band has in active rotation over 70 songs, most of which get played with some regularity. Bands like the USC band or the Oregon band play maybe 12 different songs on a gameday — our number is usually around 50. Every hear the band at a basketball or volleyball game? They sound pretty darn good. B) Where do you come up with figures like, “Half of the band members openly admitted to starting band not being able to read sheet music? Do you expect me to believe that you polled everyone in band and asked them? That’s a complete nonsense statistic, and you should be ashamed of yourself as a journalist for publishing something like that without checking it. And, “The typical warm up exercise involves losing one’s shoes…”? Please.

    The band doesn’t just happen spontaneously like your article suggests. It takes a lot of hard work from a staff of very dedicated students. Yes, the band takes anyone who wants to join. No, the band is not total anarchy.

    True, the band doesn’t blindly follow authority. But not blindly following authority and not giving two cents about the music are two entirely different things.