Cardinal for Israel hosts vigil for victims of violence in Israel

(Courtesy of Miriam Pollock)

Cardinal for Israel held a vigil on Sunday evening in honor of the Israeli victims of violence. (Courtesy of Miriam Pollock)

Members of the Stanford community came together to remember the lives of nine Israeli victims of recent terrorist attacks at a Sunday evening vigil hosted by Cardinal for Israel (CFI). The vigil occurred only days after students had gathered in White Plaza in silent protest of what they have called an Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Varied opinions on the conflict

Violence perpetrated by Palestinians against Israelis has been growing since Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year, according to the Wall Street Journal. Attacks have left nine Israelis dead and over 60 seriously injured. The first attack occurred on Sept. 14, when Palestinians threw rocks at a driver’s car in East Jerusalem, causing him to fatally crash. The driver, Alexander Levlovich, was 64 years old.

As the violence has escalated, over 40 Palestinians have been killed and 1,770 injured by live fire or rubber bullets, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry, some of whom perpetrated these acts of terror against Israeli citizens. However, many of these Palestinian civilians were not the attackers and were killed in clashes with Israeli troops in the West Bank and Gaza. These clashes are the result of tightened security by the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) in response to the terrorist attacks.

Militant groups, such as Hamas, have praised the attacks against Israelis and called for a third intifada, an organized uprising by Palestinians against Israel. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has not supported further escalation.

The reaction on Stanford’s campus to the increased violence between Israelis and Palestinians has been varied, representing many sides of the complex situation. This past Friday, a group of students gathered in White Plaza with black tape over their mouths, bearing signs condemning what they believe is an Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Fatima Zehra ’17, co-president of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), explained that Friday’s protest was a preemptive response to Sunday’s vigil.

“It was essentially a silent protest,” Zehra said. “We wanted to do something because we felt that Sunday’s protest was going to be really one-sided. So we wanted to shed some light on the fact that this is a part of a broader context… It is important to not frame this as two equal sides. It is occupier and occupied.”

CFI president Miriam Pollock ’16 responded to Zehra’s comment in a message to The Daily.

“Unfortunately, SJP lives in a different reality than the rest of us,” Pollock wrote. “SJP has decided to criticize our vigil, which mourned innocent victims of terror, for being too ‘one-sided.’”

“SJP would apparently prefer everyone took the side of terrorists,” she added. “In SJP’s reality, a vigil for victims of the 9/11 terror attacks must also mourn the ‘15 Saudi Arabians who were killed’ lest it be too ‘one-sided.’”

Sunday’s vigil

Sunday’s vigil focused primarily on the murders of Israelis over the past month and the terrorist attacks committed by Palestinians against Israelis.

“This is an event to remember victims of terrorism,” Pollock said. “So we would hope that a lot of people understand that message and would want to come out and show their support.”

Pollock emphasized that the objective of the vigil was to provide members of the Stanford community affected by the terrorist attacks with a space to mourn those who have died and an opportunity to support Israel during this time of increased violence and terror.

During the vigil, community members gathered around the stage in almost complete silence. An older man stood in the back of the crowd holding the Israeli flag, and another man wore an Israeli flag over his shoulders like a prayer shawl.  On the stage, four student speakers stood in front of candles arranged to form a Star of David.

“On Oct. 9, at the central bus station in Afula, an assailant stabs an innocent woman,” said Jacob Kaplan-Lipkin ’19, addressing the crowd. “That bus station is a block and a half from my family’s apartment. I’ve taken the bus there. They take it every day. It could’ve been one of them.”

Kaplan-Lipkin’s words captured why many chose to come to the vigil.

“I am here because my family has experienced these terror attacks in Israel right now,” said Rebecca Avera, the Israel Fellow at the Stanford Hillel. “Two of my cousins were almost there in two different terror attacks in Jerusalem and today in Beersheva. We are lucky that nothing happened to them,”

Avera herself is Israeli and has experienced a terrorist attack in Israel. As the Israel Fellow, she works at Hillel to coordinate events about Israel.

The vigil closed with the singing of a song of peace and the lighting of candles. CFI plans to continue to spread awareness of the violence in Israel through a social media campaign using #ItCouldBeMe, along with student groups at UCLA, UC Berkeley and other California schools.

“The basic idea behind it is that it could have been any one of us that are in charge of hosting this event that had been killed,” Pollock said in reference to #ItCouldBeMe.

However, the entirety of the Jewish community at Stanford does not necessarily agree with the position of Cardinal for Israel. In the coming weeks, Jewish community members will be hosting a memorial for lives lost in both Israel and Palestine.

“Help us honor Palestinian and Israeli lives recently lost in Jerusalem with interfaith prayer and a call for a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” read flyers for the event.

Matthew Cohen ’18, a member of the Jewish community, chose not to attend Sunday’s vigil, hosted by CFI, but plans to attend the memorial gathering.

“I just hope that when people see what members of the Jewish community are doing here on campus, they don’t believe that the entire Jewish community feels that way,” Cohen said in reference to Sunday’s vigil. “We are a very diverse group of people.”

The current escalation of violence in Israel has deeply affected many in the Stanford community. Some identify with the Israeli side, themselves having experienced terror attacks in Israel. Others identify with the Palestinian struggle of life under Israeli occupation.

In his final words to the crowd at Sunday’s vigil, Kaplan-Lipkin captured this complexity and perhaps the only common ground at the moment in this conflict.

“I don’t care whether the victim was Israeli or Palestinian,” Kaplan-Lipkin said. “A life is a life. And what I care about are innocent civilians losing their lives every day.”

 

Contact Blanca Andrei at bandrei ‘at’ stanford.edu.

 

A previous version of the article was titled “Cardinal for Israel hosts vigil for Israeli victims of violence in Palestine”; however, the vigil commemorated victims in Israel. The Daily regrets this error.

  • mxm123

    Ah yes, we need to pretend there is no Israeli apartheid and there are no Israeli terrorists. Alas, that’s what the billionaire sponsors of organizations like the Hillel demand.

  • Phil

    wow, just wow. Instead of offering a substantive critique of the article, why don’t we just perpetuate the stereotype of Jewish money controlling the media? Your reflexive resort to antisemitism is unbecoming, and I hope you don’t represent folks on this campus who are actually concerned about the situation in Israel/Palestine.

  • Penguin

    Unemployed antisemite says what?

  • mxm123

    A substantiative critique a racist diatribe that pretends there’s no apartheid and Israeli terrorism? Great ? Any more Nonsense from you ?

  • mxm123

    Hillel sock puppet says what?

  • Phil

    I think there are two points here. The first is a discussion on how to place this article in the larger context of reporting on the violence in Israel. You’ve added a bit of substance (thank you), though given how little you said (and the limitations of an online comment thread) it’s a little hard to engage in that.

    But more importantly (for the point I was making in my comment), I just don’t understand why your criticism has to be based on racist and antisemitic stereotypes. I’m a fan of hyperbole in discussion, but this talk of “Hillel billionaires” and “Hillel puppeteers” who control the Stanford Daily/students is unbearable. So for that reason, no, there will be no more “nonsense” from me.

  • Jenny C

    Interesting how the article on the anti-Israel event does not bother to quote the opposing side, but you can be sure an article covering the pro-Israel event gets a quote from the anti-Israel side.

    Also, does anyone fit the picture of a troll more than mxm123. Repetitive, dull, vague statements. Does he have a job? A life? Sense of worth outside of posting on multiple news forums?

  • Mitch Joe

    I’ve seen mxm123 on virtually all the Israel threads. He probably has nothing to do with his life and just trolls around on the internet. Probably not worth our time to acknowledge his existence.

  • Another dude

    Have you not seen Skullbreathe?

  • BigSticksWalkSoftly

    Is there Open Hillel yet at Stanford?

    Or are they still beholden to the rust belt Hillel that is run by Eric Fingerhut and Sheldon Adelson?

    I would like to know how many members of JVP, Open Hillel, J Street there were (I doubt there were any) at this 1-sided Israeli propaganda stunt.

    From what I understand only right wing Republicans and their Israeli Likud handlers would attend such a 1 sided Israeli propaganda stunt.

    Using the violence against civilians to justify Palestinian suffering is disgusting (unless you are a member of the archaic Hillel tent that is increasingly collapsing under the weight of its own exclusionary policies).

  • Check Your Self

    Cardinal For Israel’s “position” as described in this article is to mourn for innocent civilians who were stabbed, stoned or shot to death while riding their bicycles, or taking the bus.

    The daily portrays this as a controversial position. Not everyone supports it. The fact that not everyone supports a vigil for innocent people who were murdered is crazy.

    That’s like saying, not everyone supports a vigil for the victims in the Charleston Church shooting. @Matthew Cohen, are you comfortable that you’re portrayed as not supporting a vigil for people who were murdered? Is that something you’re proud of?

    Rather, the Vigil that you DO support mourns the murder of the Jews, AND their murderers. Should we only support vigils that include the murderers as well? If Dylan Roof were killed while murdering black people in a Charleston church, would we have to include him in the vigil?

    I’m ok if the answers are consistent. Yes we should mourn Dylan Roof + his victims and yes we should mourn Palestinian terrorists + their victims and not mourn them independently. But if you would say no to mourning Dylan Roof and yes to mourning the Palestinian terrorists then you need to check yourself because that is hypocritical.

  • Mourning Terrorists?

    “Help us honor Palestinian and Israeli lives recently lost in Jerusalem with interfaith prayer and a call for a just solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,”

    And to be clear, the Only Palestinians who have died in Jerusalem in this recent violence are those who murdered or attempted to murder Jews and were killed in self-defense.

    And so this vigil glorifies their memory.

  • mxm123

    As expected you won’t go anywhere near Israeli apartheid and its victims. Instead, you drove straight to the standard form “antisemitism” and the ” Jewish money” nonsense. And you want to lecture me on hyperbole ?

    Same old, same old.

  • mxm123

    I point out Israeli apartheid. For Hillel puppets like you, that is rather inconvenient. I guess you’d rather focus on “peace with apartheid” rather than question apartheid.

    My question. Do you have a single moral fiber in your body while you regurgitate the same old Hillel talking points. Remember, the Hillel is nothing more than a political proxy for an Israeli govt. with a racist leader like Netenyahu, whose latest racist theory is that the Palestinians were the cause of the Holocaust.

    All we get from the Hillel is “blame the victim”. And you want to point fingers at people like me who point such racist clap trap ?

  • mxm123

    Unfortunately, the Palestinians don’t have a paid political machine masquerading as a religious organization on each campus.

  • mxm123

    – Aren’t the Palestinians the ones subject to apartheid ?
    – Don’t Israeli settlers kill innocent Palestinians while the IDF looks the other way ?
    – Isn’t Israel lead by a racist leader who now blames Palestinians for the Holocaust.

    And this dude talks of Hypocrisy ?

  • Guest

    To mxm123
    Many of the grandparents of the Arab Muslims that you cry for immigrated into Palestine during the 1920’s-1930’s. Re: Robert Kennedy: “The Jews point with pride to the fact that over 500,000 Arabs in the 12 years between 1932 and 1944, came into Palestine to take advantage of living conditions existing in no other Arab state. This is the only country in the Near and Middle East where an Arab middle class is in existence.” UNRWA recognizes this fact as well. One only had to be in Palestine for 2 years and displaced to be considered a pali refugee.

    Also consider that Muslims have 56 countries today – 21 of these Arab. Israel, the size of New Jersey is the only country Jews have. This conflict is about whether Israel will become the 57th Muslim-22nd Arab state or remain the sovereign homeland of the Jews, who put Jerusalem on the map in the first place and made it an important city.

  • mxm123

    More nonsense to pretend that Palestinians moved in in the 1930’s and therefore not really residents of Palestine. Unfortunately for this author the Balfour document was written in 1917 and it points to established Arab communities.

    ” it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine”

    But then am i surprised. Nope. Its lie, lie, lie.

  • Sean M

    That is not inherently true. Of the Palestinians killed in the conflict this past month only 26 were found to be attackers by the Israeli government. Others were killed in clashes with the Israeli security force that could come from protest or could be the result of the crackdown by Israeli government. Also their are other lives lost before this month that probably weren’t picked up by mainstream media, and people like the Eritrean man who was killed by an Israeli mob who should also be acknowledged.

  • K

    I assumed that there was a push for the Daily writers to compose more detailed and unbiased work after the push back in the comments for the SJP silent protest. So I doubt this article is constructed as it is to cloud pro-Israel sentiments but rather in response to a history of poorly written articles from the Daily.

  • jack

    if those silly palestinians are unhappy they should leave. It’s funny how they chose to die as terrorists rather than go to a nicer area. also maybe if they had sex they would be less angry.

  • rsilverm

    All my love and support to Israel.

  • Jerusalem is the key word

    What has happened in Jerusalem is distinct from what has happened in the West Bank and in Gaza. This vigil said we honor those Israelis and Palestinians killed in “Jerusalem” … yes it’s a subtle nuance, but it’s those subtle nuances that make all the difference in this conflict

  • Michael

    You are a shameless hypocrite. You criticize others for “Hillel talking points” and that is exactly what you do with your “apartheid” propaganda. People who know what Apartheid is expose your lies. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcEL-NlxBk0