Tweets by @StanfordSports

RT @alexaphilippou: I wrote this 2 months ago but it seems even more fitting now, as @StanfordMSoccer plays in 1st College Cup since '02 ht…: 7 hours ago, StanfordDaily Sports
RT @dohyoungpark: It's official: No. 6 @StanfordFball will face No. 5 Iowa in the 102nd Rose Bowl Game presented by Northwestern Mutual. (J…: 4 days ago, StanfordDaily Sports

Mather: Men’s basketball needs to bring excitement back to Maples

If one thing can be said about the last few seasons of Stanford basketball, it has to be that they’ve been filled with highs and lows. Even the staunchest Stanford supporter must have been left a bit disappointed by the Cardinal’s performance at the end of the last regular season, while even the biggest Johnny Dawkins detractor had to feel some joy after Stanford’s 2014 tournament victories over New Mexico and Kansas.

Problematically, however, many of the team’s greatest moments in recent memory have occurred thousands of miles away from the school’s student body and central fan base.

Stanford’s runs to the 2015 NIT Finals and the 2014 Sweet 16, for instance, were played in New York City and Memphis, far out of the travel range of all but the most dedicated West Coast-based fans.

Even in the regular season, supposed home court advantage has seemed to have the opposite effect on Stanford basketball. The Cardinal have earned road wins against top-10 opponents in both of the last two seasons, yet they failed to record the same level of achievement when they returned to The Farm.

These realities have seemed to build a bit of disconnect between Stanford and its basketball program. Let-downs at Maples have gradually pushed fans toward the wealth of more successful sports that call Stanford’s athletic venues home, and attendance at basketball games has dwindled to a point where “The Miracle at Maples” seems like it must have occurred in an alternate universe.

It’s hard to point to anything other than sheer randomness as being responsible for this phenomenon. There aren’t any great explanations for why game-winning shots at home have rimmed out while those on the road have somehow sunk.

Admittedly Stanford’s shift toward a less-fluid style of play probably hasn’t helped the team create memorable moments, but there’s still not any single reason why the shortcomings of this strategy have been most effectively displayed right in front of the eyes of Stanford faithful.

Yet even if Stanford basketball doesn’t totally deserve the blame for this phenomenon, it falls on the shoulders of the program to fix it. Long-time fans have the luxury of waiting out a few comparatively off years of basketball. Johnny Dawkins and the current players do not.

As bad as the preseason news has seemed for this upcoming season, there are plenty of reasons to hope that this year might be the start of something new. While a season-ending injury to sophomore Robert Cartwright likely will mean that a spectacular passing game for the Cardinal remains at least a season away, sophomores Reid Travis and Michael Humphrey have shown the ability to create dazzling moments through their interior play. Explosive dunks and offensive rebounds may finally return to Maples en masse after taking a bit of a year off last year with Stefan Nastic starting in the five.

Youth and inexperience, while not always conducive to championship-level play, might also be a little overdue on the court. After three straight years of largely seeing the same players carry the Stanford basketball mantle it might do everybody a little good to get the chance to examine new stars and chant out new names.

Of course, the most important way to get fans involved again is to come out on top in close games. It may be a tall order for this young squad to finally topple perpetual conference-winner Arizona or hold its own against an upstart Cal squad in the Big Game, but if Stanford could achieve something of this magnitude it would do a lot to encourage fans that their trips to the stadium might bring them something special. Such a victory could finally start to decisively shift the story of Stanford basketball more toward the optimism that was historically characteristic of it in the pre-Dawkins era.

It almost seems that Maples itself has been designed with such a remarkable moment in mind. The Sixth Man sits just an arms length away from the action, filled with fans who might just increase their interest in the team if a signature win does occur in the arena.

All that’s needed is the sound of a perfect “swoosh.”

 

To burst Andrew Mather’s bubble and remind him that this year, which already seems to be spoiled by injuries, may not be the year for a Maples resurgence, email him at amather ‘at’ stanford.edu.

About Andrew Mather

Andrew Mather is a senior studying symbolic systems and economics. Growing up a devout Clippers and Iowa Hawkeyes fan in the suburbs of Los Angeles, Mather grew accustomed to watching his favorite programs snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. He brings this nihilistic pessimism to The Daily, where he occasionally feels a strong sense of déjà vu while covering basketball, football and golf.
  • Candid One

    AM, you did attend some games last season, no? What’s with the lack of mention of the Chasson choke? What’s with the lack of mention of crucially unfortunate timing of key injuries? What’s this offhand slight about a team letdown at the end of the season–without mentioning the key loss of Michael Humphrey, just as he was beginning to explode? Where’s this implication of “spectacular passing” ala Cartwright derive? Cartwright was benched near the end for errant passing, and toreador defense, and replaced by Christian Sanders who was the acknowledged quarterback of the offense at year’s end. Why no mention of the Allen “triplets”? Rosco and Marcus may not be related but in good health they represent the kind of basketball that you mourn. Malcolm was a medical redshirt because of a broken wrist last season; but off of his freshman year’s performance, he should have played ahead of Cartwright. Unlike Marcus, Malcolm is a natural PG; he’s also the quickest and fastest player on the team, or did you miss that observation during that saunter into the Sweet Sixteen? Cartwright is a rabid defender but the postseason exposed his ineptitude against the faster, quicker guards in the NIT; Sanders replaced him in those games. Malcolm doesn’t get beat that way. There’s much to be determined about Stanford’s basketball team amid its new injuries. Maybe you left that analysis for later. Hopefully, your coming talent reviews will be more informative, less prosaic.

  • jimidavis.com (soulful indie)

    New Modern Era: Make Big 3`s – Win Big Games!

    Balance- feet and shoulders squared to the basket, body in verticle position
    Eyes- on or above the target rim
    Elbow- parallel to arm pit (elbow, arm and hand are lined up directly over the hip to basket)
    Fingertips- cock the wrist back and spread your fingertips into the seams
    Follow Thru- lift elbow up, raise forearm to basket and snap the wrist into the “cookie jar”

    Set shots: bend the knees and raise up on your toes (no extra movement… paleeze!)

    Scoring Tips: take open shots that “flow” out of your offense (relax and trust your release)
    More right than wrong: physics in the fundamental will make many soft rim shots fall in.

  • Candid One

    Have you noticed how Steph Curry has been revising the presumptive “best practices” of shooting treys? As Jerry West said today about Curry, “I think he’s going to create a new kind of player.” The physics are being revised…and the next generations will have a different skill and technique model for aspirations.

  • jimidavis.com (soulful indie)

    Yes and No!
    Steph Curry has created nuances in his approach for shot launch “rhythm”
    (shooting shoulder turned towards basket, knees pigeon-towed, shooting hand on the side of the ball, shooting forearm laid back in an angle, ball resting on his palm) but right before his release, he adjusts his shooting position to fundamental body squared-up, ball lined-up directly over the hip ( under the hand), and on the fingertips for dynamic release-rotation. The
    take-away of your excellent point is Curry`s unique “prep” for perfection!

  • jimidavis.com (soulful indie)

    Yo, C.O.!
    Check out Klay Thompson`s “classic” shooting form.
    Let Us Talk!

  • Candid One

    Find Steph’s 2015 highlights on YouTube. His evolving improv skills are a new level…that transcends the Harlem Globetrotters–from all distances. His ability to shoot without “rhythm” is the best in the NBA–particularly on the basis of scoring effectiveness. What resembles rhythm is mostly the moment of separation that gives his shot some clearance. When he jukes defenders out of their shorts, the remaining time is luxuriously unabated so that ad hoc shot motions aren’t needed.

  • jimidavis.com (soulful indie)

    When I talk about Curry`s “rhythm,” I`m referring to his physical approach right before he releases the ball. Check-out Curry`s shooting form in “succession” (front and side views) on google IMAGES, and you will witness classic fundamentals at his release point. You sound like you grew up in the gym just like me. Do you ever see “lights out shooters” with unorthadox approach to beef?
    They have worked out their shooting “salvation” with fear and trembling! Maybe we are splitting hairs in this fun debate, but
    I have to give this round to you based on your specific Steph Points!