front_logo

The Stanford Review is a political magazine that promotes independent thought at Stanford. We aim to promote debate about campus and national issues that are otherwise not represented by traditional publications.



The Review‘s petition to reinstate a two-quarter Western Civilization requirement for undergraduates has now qualified for the spring elections ballot.
Read more.
On Wednesday morning, the ASSU Executive and Stanford Student Enterprises Chair announced to the Undergraduate Senate that Frederik Groce, CEO of SSE and
Read more.
Stanford students should not let intellectual pride obscure their ability to respect those who disagree.
Read more.
Stanford plans Wednesday to announce a ban on hard alcohol in University dorms.
Read more.
Stanford deserves a real debate on its humanities core, not a climate of silencing and voter intimidation.
Read more.
If Stanford students truly believe in the value of a comprehensive education, they should require it of humanities majors as well
Read more.
Mark Mancall, Professor Emeritus of History at Stanford and founder of Structured Liberal Education (SLE), yesterday surprised a group of
Read more.
The Western tradition is no better than any other, but it serves as a starting point. Stanford students should sign
Read more.
Replies from Greg Boardman and the ASSU Execs on FMOTQ.
Read more.
The battle over divestment from Israel continues, and this time it’s being fought with chalk.
Read more.
Last year's FMOTQ planners weigh in on Stanford's proposal to cut ties with the event.
Read more.
Studies say there is a value to homogenous friendships, but universities provide a unique place to experiment with what type
Read more.
Why did Stanford's former humanities core fail and degenerate into Thinking Matters?
Read more.
FMOTQ "will no longer be supported financially or administratively by Stanford".
Read more.
Taking a break from classes, meetings and activities is underrated on the Farm.
Read more.


  • Mia

    LOL @ this article

  • NativeLivesMatter

    How does it feel that the (way better written and way better in general) response to this logical fallacy of an article has over 300 more shares than this one? :) :) :)

    PS: Of course the CATHOLIC News Agency would say Serra is a good guy. Lol.