- Recently Posted
- Announcements
- About CrimeSolutions.gov
Philadelphia (Penn.) Intensive Aftercare Probation Program
Program Summary: This program was an intensive alternative reintegration program for high-risk male juveniles who were being released to probation from a juvenile corrections facility. The program is rated Promising. Results showed that while there were no differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the percent who had been re-arrested during the 9-month follow up, the treatment group had a statistically significantly lower number of re-arrests than the comparison group.
Skillman Intensive Aftercare Program (Pittsburgh and Detroit)
Program Summary: This was an aftercare program in Pittsburgh (Penn.) and Detroit (Mich.) for juveniles transitioning out of a residential correctional program. The intent of the program was to decrease instances of reconviction and re-arrest among participating youths after their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on rates of reconviction and rearrest among program participants in either city.
Violent Offender Treatment Program (VOTP)
Program Summary: This treatment program aims to reduce recidivism among youths convicted of violent offenses and capital crimes (such as murder) in one southern state. The program offers six months of intensive, therapeutic treatment to juveniles in a residential facility before they are released. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in reduced recidivism rates for juveniles who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate.
Brief Motivational Interviewing for Alcohol Use (Incarcerated Women)
Program Summary: This program was designed to provide an alcohol intervention to incarcerated women with hazardous drinking habits who were being released from prison. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the number of days abstinent from alcohol consumption at the 6-month follow up.
North Carolina Vocational Delivery System
Program Summary: This program was designed to assist justice-involved young adults (ages 18 to 22) in obtaining postrelease employment. It involved an integrated system of vocational training and reentry services to reduce the rate of rearrest after release. This program is rated No Effects. Results suggest there were no statistically significant differences in measures of recidivism and employment between young adults who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate.
Florida Work Release Program
Program Summary: This reentry program allows individuals who are nearing the end of their custodial sentences to work regular jobs in the community. The program is based in work release centers in participants’ counties of residence in Florida. The program is rated as Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing reconvictions of participants and increasing their employment and quarterly earnings post-release.
Returning Home – Ohio (RHO) Pilot Program
Program Summary: This program linked incarcerated persons who had disabilities and were at risk for homelessness to supportive housing upon their release from prison. The goal was to reduce recidivism, homelessness, and multiple systems use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce the probability of rearrest (but not re-incarceration) and length of time from release to rearrest; however, treatment group participants were rearrested more frequently.
Earned Early Release (Washington State)
Program Summary: Under a 2003 Washington State law, incarcerated individuals who had committed certain nonviolent offenses were able to acquire earlier release time of up to 50 percent of their maximum sentence. The program is rated Promising. Individuals who were released early under the law had a statistically significant lower rate of felony convictions, compared with individuals who were not released early; however, there was no statistically significant difference on violent convictions.
Deterrent Effect of a Warning Banner in a Computer System
Program Summary: A warning banner was presented to unauthorized computer system trespassers each time a computer system was illegally infiltrated. The banner was intended to deter trespassers from further engagement with the attacked computer system and to prevent subsequent infiltration. The program is rated No Effects. The intervention did not deter trespassers from engaging with the computer system; however, there was a small statistically significant effect on the duration of trespassing incidents.
Implementation of Federal Sex-Offender Registry Requirements in 14 States
Program Summary: This was a registration requirement targeting individuals convicted of sex offenses and other crimes against children. The federal legislation required the registration of released sex offenders, including name, address, sex crime committed, and a photograph. The program is rated No Effects. The program did not significantly reduce sex-crime rates.
The resource guide provides all of the materials necessary to promote public awareness campaigns for NCVRW and throughout the year. Featuring campaign materials in both English and Spanish, it includes planning tips, artwork, crime and victimization fact sheets, and more.
Visit our Victims & Victimization topic page for evidence-based programs and practices in this area.
Dr. Gerstenblith also addresses the lack of strong evaluations of school safety programs that schools are implementing and invested in; and the opportunity that presents for the research community.
Visit the School Safety Topic Page for related programs and practices.
On CrimeSolutions.gov you will find:
- Research on the effectiveness of programs and practices as reviewed and rated by Expert Reviewers
- Easily understandable ratings based on the evidence that indicates whether a program or practice achieves its goals: (Program Review and Rating from Start to Finish and Practice Review and Rating from Start to Finish)
- Effective
- Promising
- No Effects
- Profiles of programs and practices with research findings
Read more About CrimeSolutions.gov
CrimeSolutions.gov is not an exhaustive list of all justice-related programs and practices, and inclusion on this site does not constitute an endorsement of a program or practice by the U.S. Department of Justice. Read more.DOJ | OJP | NIJ | FOIA | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov | Translate This Page