Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal
Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal
May 19, 2017
Authors:
Christopher Field, Katharine Mach
In order to reach the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement and keep global warming below 2 degrees Celsius, some amount of carbon dioxide removal or "negative emissions" will be necessary. However, models generating possible trajectories of climate change mitigation assume global-scale carbon removal to occur in the coming decades. Though some carbon removal techniques such as reforestation and ecosystem restoration are well understood, many technologies are immature and the feasibility of massive-scale deployment remains a question. In a perspective in the journal Science, Stanford scientists explain the risks of betting the world’s future on massive-scale deployment of carbon removal technologies which could require a tremendous amount of productive landuse and cause competing interests between food security and climate change response efforts. The researchers argue that a diversified approach is needed to address these risks. See links to the perspective, news release and media coverage below.
Publication Details
Perspective in the Journal Science
Rightsizing Carbon Dioxide Removal
Stanford News Release
Assuming easy carbon removal from the atmosphere is a high-stakes gamble, Stanford scientists say
Media Coverage
Climate Central
Focus on Carbon Removal a ‘High-Stakes Gamble’
The Washington Post
Stop hoping we can fix climate change by pulling carbon out of the air, scientists warn
Salon
Focus on Carbon Removal a ‘High-Stakes Gamble’
Fast Company
This Machine Just Started Sucking CO2 Out Of The Air To Save Us From Climate Change
Center for Carbon Removal
Carbon removal: right-sized *expectations* requires right-sized *action*
Seeker
Humanity Shouldn't Rely on Negative-Emissions Technology to Curb Climate Change
Beloit Daily News
Focus on Carbon Removal a ‘High-Stakes Gamble’
Xinhuanet
Researchers warn against betting on massive-scale deployment of carbon removal technologies
Futurity
In climate fight, carbon removal is still a risky path