The arbiters of what is and is not "Islamophobia" in the United States, the Council on American Islamic Relations, are planning to devote their 2005 Annual Conference to "Islamophobia and Anti-Americanism, Causes and Remedies."
Among the luminaries speaking is the infamous Muzammil H. Siddiqi of the Islamic Society of North America. A Harvard educated, highly influential imam who serves on several boards of national Muslim groups, he was the Muslim representative at the prayer service for victims of 9/11 at the National Cathedral. He has visited with President Bush in the White House, where he assured the President that the Muslim community "unanimously condemns" the terrorist acts of 9/11.
Here is an interesting statement from Mr. Siddiqi, taken from Paul Sperry's Infiltration:
"I believe that as Muslims, we should participate in the system to safeguard our interests and try to bring about gradual change" and in a 2003 fatwa, he said, "We must not forget that Allah's rules have to be established in all lands, and all our efforts should lead in that direction." In an anti-Israel rally across from the White House, he said, "America has to learn, if you remain on the side on injustice,the wrath of God will come."
Well, aren't we blessed to have such nice, sweet and moderate Muslims in the highest levels of leadership in the Muslim community in America?
Sounds like Mr. Siddiqi has some inside information. That sort of thing was said in mosques before 9-11, so I believe that 9-11 was pretty much common knowledge among the ummah before it happened.
Islamophobia and Anti-Americanism.
Causes=CAIR
Remedies=CAIR's removal from American soil.
"We must not forget that Allah's rules have to be established in all lands..." said Mr. Siddiqi in 2002.
And how can one do that when outright military conquest is not possible?
The answer, in the new conditions in which Mr. Siddigi now finds himself, is clear:
"..as Muslims, we should participate in the system to safeguard our interests and try to bring about gradual change..."
We "should participate" in order "to safeguard our [Muslim] interests" and "try to bring about gradual change..." which can only mean islamization, a situation where, even if some Infidels remain, they are subjugated to the rule of Islam.
For a Believer, a True Believer such as Mr. Siddiqi, it cannot be otherwise. A past master, necessarily, at taqiyya and kitman, at obfuscation and speaking with forked tongue so that Muslims will understand clearly what he means, and Infidels clearly misunderstand what he means -- this is a Muslim Everyman, and for that he has earned what the courts like to call strict scrutiny. Indeed, every Muslim spokesman, especailly in this New Season of Muslim Support for "Dialogue" and "Avoiding a Clash of Civilizations" and "Pluralism" (meaning: let us take advantage of whatever freedoms are innocently proferred us to be fully exploited until such time as Islam is fully entrenched, and cannot be dislodged, and islamization is well underway through demography and a relentless campaign of Da'wa, aided and abetted by an equally relentless campaign of sweet nothings or when those won't do, intimidation and threat of litigation. It is the same everywhere, with the results we all see -- in Holland today, and in France and England tomorrow.
Is it beyond the wit of Americans to learn from the unhappy experience of others?
Is there any non-Muslim in Europe today, who could disagree with the following statement:
"The existence of a large populatiion of Muslims in European countries has led, for the indigenous Infidels as well as for other non-Muslim arrivals, such as Hindus and Buddhists, to a situation that is far more unpleasant, unsettled, expensive, and physically dangerous than it would otherwise be."
That statement is true. How one figures out what can be done, or cannot be done, and how one acts or fails to act, is another matter. But the observation itself cannot, by the realistic, be denied.
Hugh
The statement is true, but needs to have added to it the fact that Jews are now feeling the lash of Islamic bigotry both in the streets and in the air...on university campuses and across media, and in physical, terms the number of anti-Semitic attacks and deranged Jew hatred emanating from Muslim communities is rising all the time.
They will go for the Jews first. In England that will be followed by the Hindus and the Sikhs. Then take your pick.
You are correct Zico the Jews are feeling the lash of the Muslims to wit this item, snagged from the net.
What is not mentioned is that the Professors at Columbia are the Muslim mafia, who freely and regularly trash not only Israel but America and any students who stand up to them.
IDIOTIC.
SATANICALLY
LED
ASSOCIATION (of)
MASS-MURDERERS.
Many people still fail to realize that war is not always fought with bombs and guns. Today we are fighting for dominance through economics, demographics, education, a part of education, and outreach programs, including Da'wa, all deceptively peaceful weapons that are more dangerous than the bombs and guns.
Islamophobia does not really exist for it means an irrational fear of Islam. Islam is engulfing today's civilizations in the same way they did in the past is a reality. People have the right to be concerned and forceful in their resistance to such strategies and tactics.
The lessons that Muslims want to wipe from the history books and the attempt to sanitize the character of the Prophet Mohammed are efforts to make Islam palatable for mass consumption in this war to overtake the West. War is deception and weapons of war are seeming soft, and more dangerous than the terrorism of the jihadists' bombs.
I don’t think Mr Siddiqi really grasps Webster’s definition of anti-Americanism.
A common occurrence among those at CAIR in general and Moslems in particular. CAIR would in effect have to dissolve in order for them to truly start to tackle
anti-Americanism.
In the last 57 years his Allah has proven incapable or unwilling to remove their scourge know as Israel. Matter of fact, Israel has flourished despite thousands upon thousands of attempts to destroy them. His definition of American injustice is American support for Israel.
Islam’s view of injustice, is contrary to its definition. Injustice in Islam, is not worshiping Mohammad. Injustice in Islam is not bowing to Islam as superior in all things. Injustice in Islam is being a Jew, Christian, or any other unbelieving infidel. In light of recent events in Afghanistan and Iraq, Mr Siddiqi’s words are prophetic, just not in the sense he intended. An example of Islamic justice, perceived unbelievers are not worthy of mercy, respect or equal rights under law. Perceived unbelievers are only good for piercing, chopping and slavery.
Is Mohammad, the ultimate self-absorbed prophet, who never really prophesied?
Is Islamic “monotheism” by definition one God at a time?
Questions Moslems are forbidden to ask, which has to provoke in any rational minded person the very questions that are forbidden.
More examples of Islamic equality particular to women.