Diplomatic recognition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diplomatic recognition in international law is a unilateral political act, with domestic and international legal consequences, whereby a state acknowledges an act or status of another state or government. Recognition can be accorded either de facto or de jure, usually by a statement of the recognizing government.

Contents 1 Recognition of states and governments 2 Unrecognized state 3 Other types of recognition 4 See also 5 References

[edit] Recognition of states and governments

This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (November 2008)

Diplomatic recognition must be distinguished from recognition of states and their governments.^[1]

The fact that states do not maintain bilateral diplomatic relations does not mean that they do not recognize or treat one another as states. A state is not required to accord formal recognition to any other state, but it is required to treat as a state an entity that meets the requirements. A state has a responsibility not to recognize as a state any entity that has attained the qualifications for statehood in violation of the prohibition against the threat or use of force contained in the UN Charter. States can exercise their recognition powers either explicitly or implicitly.^[2]

The recognition of a government implies recognition of the state it governs, but not vice versa. De facto recognition of states, rather than de jure, is rare. De jure recognition is stronger, while de facto recognition is more tentative and relates more to recognizing that a government exercises control over a territory. An example of the difference is when the United Kingdom recognised the Soviet Union de facto in 1921, but de jure only in 1924. Another example is the state of Israel in 1948, whose government was immediately recognised de facto by the United States (and later Britain), and "one-upped" 3 days later by Soviet de jure recognition.

Renewing recognition of a government is not necessary when it changes in a normal, constitutional way (such as an election or referendum), but is necessary in the case of a coup d'etat or revolution. Recognition of the new government by other states can be important for its long term survival. For instance, the Taliban government of the Islamic State of Afghanistan, which lasted from 1996 to 2001, was recognised by only Pakistan, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, while far more had recognised the government of ousted President Burhanuddin Rabbani. The Disputed territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh as "Integral Parts" of the Republic of India are not recognised by either Pakistan or the People's Republic of China but recognised by Russia

Recognition can be implied by other acts, like the visit of the head of state, or the signing of a bilateral treaty. If implicit recognition is possible, a state may feel the need to explicitly proclaim that its acts do not constitute diplomatic recognition, as when the United States commenced its dialogue with the Palestine Liberation Organization in 1988.

The doctrine of non-recognition of illegal or immoral factual situations (e.g. territorial gains achieved by the use of force) is called the Stimson Doctrine, and has become more important since the Second World War, especially in the United Nations as a method of ensuring compliance with international law - for instance, in the case of Rhodesia in 1965. Withdrawal of recognition is an even more severe act of disapproval of another state than the breaking of diplomatic relations.

[edit] Unrecognized state

Several of the world's geo-political entities lack general international recognition, but wish to be recognized as sovereign states. The degree of de facto control these entities exert over the territories they claim varies.

Most are subnational regions with an ethnic or national identity of their own that have "broken off" (i.e. separated themselves) from their original parent state, and hence they are commonly referred to as "break-away" states. Some of these entities are in effect internally self-governing protectorates that enjoy military protection and informal diplomatic representation abroad through another state to prevent forced reincorporation into their original states.

Note that the word "control" in this list refers to control over the area occupied, not occupation of the area claimed. Unrecognized countries can be separated into those which have full control over their occupied territory and those with only partial control (such as Western Sahara). The main difference is that in the former, the de jure governments of the areas in question have no (or nearly no) influence in the areas under question, whereas in the latter they can have varying degrees of control, and may provide essential services to people living in the areas.

[edit] Other types of recognition

Other things which can be recognised include the occupation or annexation of territory, or belligerent rights of a party in a conflict. The last does not mean that the recognizing party considers the recognized a state.

Examples of recognition of belligerent status include:

• The United Kingdom recognized the Confederate States of America as belligerents in the first month of the American Civil War.^{[citation needed]}
• Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela recognized the Sandinista National Liberation Front as a belligerent in Nicaragua's civil war in June, 1979.
• France and Mexico recognized the FMLN as a belligerent in the civil war in El Salvador on August 28. 1981.

[edit] See also

• List of states with limited recognition
• Micronation
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
• Declarative theory of statehood
• Constitutive theory of statehood

[edit] References

• Tozun Bahcheli, Barry Bartmann, and Henry Srebrnik; De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty , Routledge, (2004) online edition
• Edgars Dunsdorfs (1975). The Baltic Dilemma, The case of the de jure recognition of incorporation of the Baltic States into the Soviet Unions by Australia. Robert Speller & Sons, New York. ISBN 0-8315-0148-0. 
• Gerhard von Glahn (1992). Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law. Macmillan. ISBN 0-02-423175-4. 
• Malcolm N. Shaw (2003). International Law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-53183-7. 
• Stefan Talmon; Recognition of Governments in International Law: With Particular Reference to Governments in Exile Clarendon Press, (1998) online edition
• Gregory Weeks; "Almost Jeffersonian: U.S. Recognition Policy toward Latin America," Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 31, 2001 online edition