- 不得贪胜 the greedy do not get success
- 入界宜缓 be unhurried to enter opponent’s territory
- 攻彼顾我 take care of oneself when attacking the other
- 弃子争先 discard a stone to gain advance
- 舍小就大 abandon small to save big
- 逢危须弃 when in danger, sacrifice
- 慎勿轻速 make thick shape, avoid hasty moves
- 动须相应 a move must respond to the opponent’s
- 彼强自保 against strong positions, play safely
- 势孤取和 look for peace, avoid fighting in an isolated or weak situation
October 16, 2009
Zion’s violations of 王积薪的围棋十决
October 14, 2009
Freedom of Choice most rational in China
Logical Progress
While every year tons and tons of nutritious baby-meat is just thrown out in Europe and America, Chinese gourmands make good use of their baby-cull. A little non-human stewed for 8 hours with Chinese herbs is thought to boost one’s “yang”. Naturally, a mother has the right to choose.
A restaurant in Foshan, Guangdong Province, calls the dish, “spare ribs”. The chef collects girl babies from the surrounding poor villagers; sometimes an aborted baby, sometimes a still-born, sometimes an infanticided second child. The restaurant guarantees that its babies are fresh, not frozen.
Much Wastage in the American Holocaust
Selfish Occidental women refuse to share their kills with the rest of the herd.
American Holocaust documentation from C.W. Porter
Hong Kong Eastern Express 東快訊, 1995.04.12
Reporters from EastWeek – a sister publication of Eastern Express – went to Shenzhen to see if the rumours could be substantiated. On March 7, a reporter entered the state-run Shenzhen Health Centre for Women and Children feigning illness and asked a female doctor for a foetus. The doctor said the department was out of stock but to come again.
The next day the reporter returned at lunch time. The doctor eventually emerged from the operating theatre holding a fist size glass bottle stuffed with thumbsized foetuses.
She said: ‘There are 10 foetuses here, all aborted this morning. You can take them. We are a state hospital and don’t charge anything.
‘Normally, we doctors take them home to eat – all free. Since you don’t look well, you can take them.’
Not every state hospital is as generous with its dead embryos as the Health Centre for Women and Children. At the Shenzhen People’s Hospital, for example, the reporter was in for a surprise.
When a Ms. Yang, the head nurse, was asked for foetuses, she looked anxious and asked other staff to leave. After closing the door, she asked the undercover buyer in a low voice: ‘Where did you (get to) know that we sell foetuses?’
The reporter answered: ‘A doctor friend in Hong Kong told me.’
‘Who? What is his/her name?’
The reporter was not prepared for this line of questioning and could not come up with a name. Yang told him that foetuses were only for sale within the hospital, and were not for public purchase. She added that some staff would, however, sell the foetuses on to Hong Kong buyers.
The reporter learned that the going rate for a foetus was $10 but when the merchandise was in short supply, the price could go up to $20. But these prices are pin money compared to those set by private clinics, which are said to make a fortune selling foetuses. One chap on Bong Men Lao Street charges $300 for one foetus. The person in charge of the clinic is a man in his 60’s. When he saw the ailing reporter, he offered to take an order for foetuses that had reached full-term and which, it is claimed, contain the best healing properties. When a female doctor named Yang – no relation – of Sin Hua clinic was asked whether foetuses were edible, she said emphatically: ‘Of course they are. They are even better than placentas.
‘They can make your skin smoother, your body stronger and are good for kidneys. When I was in an army hospital in Jiangti province, I often brought foetuses home. They were pink, like little mice, with hands and feet. Normally, I buy some pork to make soup (with the foetuses added). I know they are human beings, and (eating them) feels disgusting. But at that time, it was already very popular.’
A Mr. Cheng from Hong Kong claims he has been eating foetus soup for more than six months. To begin, the man, in his 40’s, would make the trip to Shenzhen frequently for business and was introduced to foetuses by friends. He says he met a number of professors and doctors in government hospitals who helped him buy the foetuses. ‘At first, I felt uncomfortable, but doctors said the substances in foetuses could help cure my asthma. I started taking them and gradually, the asthma disappeared,’ Cheng said.
Now, Cheng only eats foetuses occasionally to top up his treatment, but there was a time when he made regular cross border trips with the gruesome merchandise. ‘Everytime [I made the trip], I carried a Thermos flask to Shenzhen and brought the foetuses back to Hong Kong to make soup. If they gave me 20 or 30 at a time, I put them in the refrigerator. I didn’t have the soup every day – it depended on the supply.
‘Usually, I washed the foetuses clean, and added ginger, orange peel and pork to make soup. After taking it for a while, I felt a lot better and my asthma disappeared. I used to take placenta, but it was not so helpful.’ When asked if he was concerned about the foetuses containing diseases, Cheng was dismissive. ‘I bought them from government hospitals. They would check the pregnant women before doing the operations and only sell them to me if there was no problem. Also, I always boil them over high heat which kills any bacteria.’ Although Cheng has overcome any squeamishness over eating foetus soup, he says he draw the line at consuming whole dead embryos. He also refrains from telling people of his grisly dietary habits.
Zou Qin, 32, a woman from Hubei with the fine skin of a someone several years younger, attributes her well preserved looks to a diet of foetuses. As a doctor at the Lun Hu Clinic, Zou has carried out abortions on several hundred patients. She believes foetuses are highly nutritious and claims to have eaten more than 100 in the past six months. She pulls out a foetus specimen before a reporter and explains the selection criteria. ‘People normally prefer (foetuses of) young women, and even better, the first baby and a male.’ She adds: ‘They are wasted if we don’t eat them. The women who receive abortions here don’t want the foetuses. Also, the foetuses are already dead [when we eat them]. We don’t carry out abortions just to eat the foetuses.
‘Before, my sister’s children were very weak. I heard that foetuses were good for your health and started taking some to my nephews,’ Zou says, without remorse. ‘I wash them with clear water until they look transparent white and then stew them. Making soup is best.’ But she admits there are drawbacks to this dubious delicacy. ‘Foetuses are very smelly and not everybody can take the stink,’ she said. ‘You can also make meat cakes by mixing foetuses with minced meat but you have to add more ginger and chives to get rid of the smell.’
Hong Kong legislator Dr. Tan Siu-tong is surprised that it could be within anyone’s capability to overcome the stench of a dead foetus, even if their stomachs are lined with lead. ‘When all the placental tissue is dead, the smell is awful and is enough to make you feel sick. It is like having a dead mouse in the house,’ he said.
The foetuses allegedly eaten by the Chinese are all provided by China’s extensive abortion services. Last year, doctors in the People’s Hospital – the biggest hospital in Shenzhen – carried out more than 7,000 terminations, 509 on Hong Kong women. The Hong Kong Family Planning Association (FPA) estimates that 24 per cent of all abortions on Hong Kong women are performed in the dubious surroundings of a Chinese hospital. A Ms. Li from Hong Kong has had two abortions in Shenzhen but has never heard of people eating foetuses. ‘But I didn’t want the babies, so after the abortions, I just left them with the hospital,’ she says. ‘I didn’t want to look at them, and I certainly didn’t want to keep them. Foetuses of two or three months are just water and blood when they come out. They are so small, how can you eat them?’
Doctors in the territory have responded with disgust and incredulity to stories of people supplementing their diets with foetuses. Many have read articles of foetal cannibalism but none has been able to verify the reports. They are treating the issue with skepticism. Dr. Margaret Kwan, a gynecologist who until two weeks ago held the post of chief executive at the FPA, says: ‘This is the strangest thing I have ever heard coming out of China. I just hope it is not true.’
Dr. Warren Lee, president of the Hong Kong Nutrition Association, is aware of the unsavory rumours. ‘Eating foetuses is a kind of traditional Chinese medicine and is deeply founded in Chinese folklore. In terms of nutrition, a foetus would be a good source of protein and fats, and there are minerals in bone. But I don’t know if eating foetuses is just folklore or more than that,’ he says. According to Lee, it is conceivable that foetuses are rich in certain hormones that are beneficial to the adult human body, but should this be the case, the foetal matter would have to be converted into an injectible form for best results, as most hormones including the hormone for diabetes, insulin – are broken down in the digestive system before they have a chance to be absorbed by the body.
But Lee suggests that anyone who eats a foetus would be seeking a remedy that is far more elusive than a hormone or mineral. ‘Some people may think there is also an unidentified substance or chemical that has healing powers, but there is no evidence that this is true.’ Lee urges people to be wary – ‘There are people out there who just want to make money and they will come up with all sorts of formulas or substances, which, they say will cure diseases.’
As a child, Patrick Yau was fed on human placentas by his mother who worked at a local hospital, but in his current position as a psychologist with the Social Welfare Department he is both repulsed and shocked by the notion of eating foetuses. ‘As a Catholic, I object to abortions because I believe the foetus is a human life, and I certainly object to eating a dead baby after it has been aborted,’ he says. Yau concedes that in China, where the one child policy has turned abortions into an acceptable remedy to an unfortunate human blunder, people may have adopted a new outlook on life before birth, such that embryos are stripped of their status as human beings.
But Tang fails to understand how anyone anywhere can convince themselves ‘that they are just eating an organism when they are actually eating a dead body’. ‘It may not be a formed human being, but when they think about it most people would think: ‘Ugh! No, I can’t eat that.’ I don’t think civilized people with an education could do that sort of thing.’
Dr. Wong, a Hong Kong doctor who practices Western medicine, thinks only the ignorant would eat human foetuses. He explains that foetuses contain mucoploysaccharide, which is beneficial to the metabolism, but states that it can be found in a lot of other food – Chinese doctor Chu Ho-Ting agrees that there is no place for foetuses in medicine, and suggests that it might even be unhealthy if the pregnant woman was infected by disease.
‘Most bacteria can be killed under 100 degree heat but some require 400 degrees. Some people believe eating foetuses can strengthen the immunity of the human body against diseases, but this is wrong. Although foetuses contain protein, they are not as nutritious as placenta, which contains different kinds of nutrients. But even placenta has to be taken with other Chinese herbs.’
Katherine Sabelko in Children of the Rosary, 1995.05
This world is tolerating and even at times encourages abortion. This world tolerates the research done on preborn infants. Facts that I never wanted to place before you have been going on in this world, in the name of medical research.
Just one example was reported in Life Advocate, Feb. 1995 in an article by Denise Billings, titled ‘Federal Cannibalism’: ‘Tissue cultures are obtained by dropping still living babies into meat grinders and homogenizing them, according to the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine.’
Now, though, even a more horrid nightmare is taking place: the Chinese are actually eating preborn children.
The newswires out of Hong Kong released the information that Chinese doctors are eating aborted babies and selling the children as health food. The Eastern Express reports on a doctor they interviewed who stated that the babies are ‘even better than placentas’ referring to the nutritional value.
From the Kyodo News Service, Japan Economic Newswire, dateline Hong Kong, April 12, 1995, we quote:
‘”They can make your skin smoother, your body stronger and are good for the kidneys,” said the female doctor from the southern Chinese city ’s Sin Hua Clinic.’
A female doctor at the city’s Luo Eu Clinic, who has carried out hundreds of abortions, reportedly claimed to have eaten 100 fetuses in the past six months. She was quoted as saying the best were firstborn males from young women.
‘I wash them with clear water until they look transparent white and then stew them. Making soup is best.’ she was quoted as saying, adding, ‘They are wasted if we don’t eat them.’
In The Daily Telegraph, Bejing, April 13, 1995, a story by Yojana Sharma and Graham Hutchings repeated the facts surrounding the cannibalism taking place. The sale of the babies for nutritional value was not overlooked.
A woman doctor, referred to only as Wang, from the Sin Hua Clinic, Shenzhen, was quoted as saying, ‘The fetuses were even better than placentae’ in nutritional value. ‘They make your skin smoother, your body stronger and are good for the kidneys’ she said. Dr. Warren Lee, president of the Hong Kong Nutrition Association, said: ‘Eating fetuses is a traditional Chinese medicine deeply founded in folklore.’
As hard as it must be to read the reports coming out of China, it has been much harder for me to relate them to you. As I read these reports on my desk, I remember the words so often said to me by non-active pro-lifers: ‘It can’t get any worse!’ Well, it is worse.
Cases of Forced Abortions Surface in China
During the past week, dozens of women in southwest China have been forced to have abortions even as late as nine months into the pregnancy, according to evidence uncovered by NPR.
China’s strict family planning laws permit urban married couples to have only one child each, but in some of the recent cases — in Guangxi Province — women say they were forced to abort what would have been their first child because they were unmarried. The forced abortions are all the more shocking because family planning laws have generally been relaxed in China, with many families having two children.
Liang Yage and his wife Wei Linrong had one child and believed that — like many other couples — they could pay a fine and keep their second baby. Wei was 7 months pregnant when 10 family planning officials visited her at home on April 16.
Liang describes how they told her that she would have to have an abortion, “You don’t have any more room for maneuver,” he says they told her. “If you don’t go [to the hospital], we’ll carry you.” The couple was then driven to Youjiang district maternity hospital in Baise city.
“I was scared,” Wei told NPR. “The hospital was full of women who’d been brought in forcibly. There wasn’t a single spare bed. The family planning people said forced abortions and forced sterilizations were both being carried out. We saw women being pulled in one by one.”
The couple was given a consent agreement to sign. When Liang refused, family planning officials signed it for him. He and his wife are devout Christians — he is a pastor — and they don’t agree with abortion.
The officials gave Wei three injections in the lower abdomen. Contractions started the next afternoon, and continued for almost 16 hours. Her child was stillborn.
“I asked the doctor if it was a boy or girl,” Wei said. “The doctor said it was a boy. My friends who were beside me said the baby’s body was completely black. I felt desolate, so I didn’t look up to see the baby.”
Medical sources say fetuses aborted in this manner would have been dead for some time, so the tissue is necrotic and thus dark in color.
“The nurses dealt with the body like it was rubbish,” Wei said. “They wrapped it up in a black plastic bag and threw it in the trash.”
This was also the treatment given to the stillborn baby of He Caigan. Family planning officials turned up at her house, in the countryside several hours outside Baise, before dawn on April 17 to force her to go to the hospital. This would have been her first baby — but she hadn’t married the father, in contravention of family planning laws. She was already 9 months pregnant, just days away from delivery.
“They told me I’m too young, I couldn’t keep the child and I should have an abortion,” she said. “I’m too young to get a marriage certificate — I’m only 19 and my boyfriend’s only 21.”
After the forced abortion, her boyfriend left her. She said that she’s still in great physical pain and that her life had been ruined.
An eyewitness, who requested anonymity for fear of the consequences, said that he counted 41 occupied beds on just one floor of the maternity hospital in Baise and that he believed none of the women he saw had come to the hospital of their own free will.
Coerced abortions such as these were not unusual after China’s one-child policy was first introduced in 1980. But a law passed five years ago guarantees China’s citizens a degree of choice in family planning matters. When contacted for comment, an official at China’s State Commission for Population and Family Planning said she’d heard nothing about forced abortions in Guangxi and asked for more details. But in Baise, a family planning official surnamed Nong acknowledged that such behavior would violate regulations. Despite the fact that these allegations refer to events that happened just within the last week, he said an investigation had already been held.
“We were very surprised to hear of these accusations,” Nong said, “but our investigation concluded some individuals who were dissatisfied with our family planning policies were fabricating stories. These facts simply don’t exist. We really love and care for women here.”
Official figures published by the Xinhua news agency shed some light on why a forced abortion campaign might be judged necessary. They show that the Baise government missed its family planning targets last year. The recorded birth rate was 13.61 percent, slightly higher than the goal of 13.5 percent. This is significant because the career prospects of local officials depend upon meeting these goals.
Wei Linrong and her husband Liang Yage, were incensed by their treatment, seeing it as little short of murder.
“I think their methods are too cruel,” said Wei, “my heart really hurts. Such a tiny baby, it was innocent. And they killed it.”
“Every time we talk about this child, we both cry,” Liang added. “We can’t bear talking about this child.”
Liang and his wife risked further official disapproval by contacting a Christian group overseas to publicize their plight. China may once have depended on its state apparatus of control and fear to silence those who suffer human rights abuses at the hands of its officials. But China’s victims are angry, and they want their voices to be heard.
China’s Baby Traffickers
[Women], from the most desperately poor villages, have turned into full-time baby machines, squeezing out children-for-sale in the shadows of their dirt-floor shacks. “Before, we made money by raising pigs,” says a 23-year-old woman who sold two children just days after they were born. “But it takes a year to raise a pig and it’s expensive to feed. A baby takes only nine months and doesn’t cost any money.” …Girls, two-week-old bundles with shocks of black hair, cost $25 each. Boys, traditionally favored, sell for $50… The babies spend a few weeks in makeshift foster homes as the smugglers scour the mountains for enough children to take to market… After the gangs gather enough babies, they take them to villages like Chicken Street, Cow Street or Pig Street. There, experienced smugglers pick through the day’s offerings: babies with high noses and long earlobes are the most prized, while those with small eyes and dark skin sell for less. According to a statement made by an arrested gang member last year, the smugglers pay about $180 for a girl and $290 for a boy…New parents spend up to $500 for their illegal child, a markup of at least 900% from the original price.
Forced Abortions in China, LifeSite, 2008.11.14
Beijing, China (LifeNews.com) — Chinese officials are coming under heavy criticism from a leading pro-life member of Congress who is upset they are considering forcing a woman who is six months pregnant to have an abortion. China strictly enforces its one-child family planning policy and uses forced abortions and sterilizations to do so.
What separates the case of Arzigul Tursun from others is that the woman is 26 weeks into her pregnancy and the abortion would very likely cause her health problems.
Tursun is also a Muslim Uighur woman and Chinese family planning officials don’t normally enforce the one-child law as rigorously with minorities as they do on people of Chinese decent.
Tursun is currently at the Municipal Watergate Hospital in the extreme northwestern part of China and the baby would be her third child if she is allowed to complete the pregnancy.
Her husband says officials in their village of Yining learned of the pregnancy and they warned the couple that their property would be confiscated if Tursun did not have an abortion.
According to McClatchy newspapers, the case has attracted the attention of Rep. Chris Smith, a New Jersey Republican congressman who is a leading pro-life advocate.
Smith has written to Zhou Wenzhong, the China ambassador to the United States, and demanded that the “nightmare of a forced abortion” not be used in Tursun’s case.
“The Chinese Government is notorious for this barbaric practice, but to forcibly abort a woman while the world watches in full knowledge of what is going on would make a mockery of its claim that the central government disapproves of the practice,” Smith said, according to the news service.
The couple already have two children and they returned to their village when they learned their home and property would be confiscated.
“We considered our two girls,” the husband told McClatchy. “If the house and properties were taken away, how would they live? So my wife came back home and went to the hospital.”
Forced abortions in China has become an issue in the United States as incoming president Barack Obama is likely to fund the UNFPA, a United Nations agency that has been involved in the forced abortions there.
Use aborted foetus organs in transplants, urges scientist
Kidneys and livers from aborted foetuses could be given to the desperately ill and ease the organ donor shortage, a leading scientist has claimed.
Professor Sir Richard Gardner, an Oxford University stem cell expert, said foetal tissues may offer a more realistic solution to the lack of organs than other technologies being developed.
But the proposal has horrified pro-life and Christian groups, who say it is ‘morally abhorrent’, and raises the prospect of abortions being timed to suit transplant patients.
Calling for studies into the feasibility of transplanting foetal organs, Sir Richard, an advisor to Britain’s fertility watchdog and the Royal Society, said he was surprised the possibility had not been considered, and that experiments in mice have shown that foetal kidneys grow extremely quickly when transplanted to adult animals.
Sir Richard said: ‘It is probably a more realistic technique in dealing with the shortage of kidney donors than others.’
However, he added that much research would be needed to show such transplants were effective.
Almost 7,000 of the 8,000 Britons waiting for a transplant need a kidney. More than 300 are hoping for a liver, 222 need lungs and almost 100 have requested a heart.
Kidney donors have a less than one-in-three chance of receiving an organ in any given year, and hundreds on the transplant list will die before a donor becomes available. Kidneys can be provided by a live donor, but this involves major surgery.
Stem cells, ‘master cells’ widely hailed as a ‘repair kit’ for the body, offer hope. However, the creation of fully-functioning 3D organs is ‘remote’, Sir Richard said.
Other research is focusing on designer pigs with ‘humanised’ organs, but cross-species transplants carry the risk of disease, Sir Richard told an Oxford International Biomedical Centre conference.
The use of aborted foetuses ‘is something that could be done but it’s not something that’s talked about much’, Sir Richard said. He added: ‘It is at least a temporary solution.’
Dr Peter Saunders, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, said the transplants would be immoral as every human being, even the unborn, deserved ‘protection, respect, wonder and empathy’.
Josephine Quintavalle, of Comment on Reproductive Ethics, described the proposal as ‘absolutely horrifying’. She said: ‘At what stage do you say to the woman who is to have an abortion, “Can we have some organs for transplant?” ‘
But Professor Stuart Campbell, who has argued for the abortion time limit to be lowered, had no ethical objections to the proposal.
He said many babies were aborted quite late, ‘and if they are going to be terminated, it is a shame to waste their organs’.
Sunstein: Fetuses ‘use’ women, abortion limits ‘troublesome’
Obama regulatory chief offers radical new interpretation of Constitution
By Aaron Klein, WorldNetDaily, 2009.09.25
JERUSALEM – Restrictions on access to abortion would turn women’s bodies into vessels to be “used” by fetuses, according to President Obama’s newly confirmed regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein.
“A restriction on access to abortion turns women’s reproductive capacities into something to be used by fetuses. … Legal and social control of women’s sexual and reproductive capacities has been a principal historical source of sexual inequality,” Sunstein wrote in his 1993 book “The Partial Constitution.”
In the book, obtained and reviewed by WND, Sunstein sets forth a radical new interpretation of the Constitution. In one chapter, titled “Pornography, abortion, surrogacy,” Sunstein argued against restrictions on abortion and pornography.
“Restrictions on abortion, surrogacy and free availability of pornography are troublesome,” he wrote.
NIH Told to Stop Use Of Aborted Fetuses;Controversial, Promising Tests Banned by Administration
The Washington Post, 1988.04.15
The Reagan administration has banned all experiments at the National Institutes of Health that use tissue from aborted fetuses, halting federal research in a field that many scientists consider among the most promising in modern medicine.
And that promise can now be fulfilled!
October 13, 2009
Yad Vashem, Holocaust Museum, ADL DENY that 3/4 of European Jews Destroyed!!!
Why do Yad Vashem, The Holocaust Museum, ADL and other obvious antishemites insist that 2/3 of European Jewry perished, when clearly there is evidence that Three Quarters of Europe’s 6,000,000 Jews were “destroyed”!!! I demand that Abe Foxy Foxman be immediately extradicted to Germany to spend five years in a Scheiß-BRD Lager for his blatant Holocaust Denial! That’ll teach the Jew-hating bastard!
“Daddy, why did those bloodthirsty Jews kill us?”
October 13, 2009
“The CIA and FBI are tinker toys compared to the ADL.”
The Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith
A Report by the late-U.S. Senator Jack B. Tenney
[This is from the 1960s, and everything has only gotten worse with these ANti-Christs, except at least it's easier to get information now, which is why the ADL want the internet shut down. Just wait till they start demanding that people need licenses to blog. Transcribed by Dr David Duke. Photocopies of original text at Honest Media Today.]
While the ADL, bureaucracy emphasizes its Jewish character for defensive purposes it does not speak for American Jews. The political nature of its work is not revealed to the average Jewish contributor, and its activities in this field are carefully concealed from American Jewry and the general public under either ethnic or religious cloaks.
The fears and complexes of the Jew are exploited by the bureaucracies that control and direct the net-work of organizations set up in his name and ostensibly for his protection. The laws of America are not sufficient, he is told. There must be a multitude of committees and councils — a vast inter-locking series of organizations that will work for his interest alone.
The Anti-Defamation League is one of the most aggressive of these Jewish agencies. Through its exploitation methods in its appeals for funds many American Jews have become obsessed with the idea that all non Jews are either consciously and actively anti-Semitic or passive and potentially anti-Semitic. The scare-propaganda of the ADL, has served to perpetuate and intensify the persecution complex in the collective Jewish mind. Confidential material mailed to American Jews by organizations appealing for funds is marked “to be destroyed after reading” — thus creating an atmosphere of terrifying secrecy and pending doom: the futility of appealing to the ordinary governmental agencies, and effectually cutting the Jew off from his American fellows.
“It is currently estimated,” declares a spokesman for the Joint Jewish Appeal, “that 25%–or more than 20 million Americans–have an already rooted prejudice against their fellow citizens. Fourteen independent polls, conducted by impartial research organizations–reveal that out of every four adults questioned at least one has been infected with anti-Semitism. . . one is opposed to anti-Semitism. . . while a third. . . and a fourth are, as yet undecided.”
Thus 75 percent of the adult population, according to this statement, is either actively or potentially anti-Semitic. The one in four or 25 percent opposed to anti-Semitism–and this group must necessarily include the American Jewish population–indicates that nearly every adult Gentile American–including American Negroes–are actively or passively anti-Semitic. Whether the Jewish organizations behind the Jewish Appeal intend to convey this impression is probably irrelevant, but the conclusion is inescapable.
2
Beyond the double doors of the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is a single door. On it is lettered: “FACT FINDING, LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE DIVISIONS.”
Shall we enter?
“We are unwilling to guess about anti-Semitism.” an ADL, spokesman tells us. “The offices have long maintained a close watch on the activities of Democracy’s bigoted enemies.”
Despite the double-talk involved in the use of the term “Democracy” we understand what the spokesman is saying.
Our glance follows banks of filing cabinets and, for a moment, we believe we are in the Record Department of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Washington. D.C. Clerks are busy at the cabinets, sorting and filing papers.
Our ADL, spokesman is very frank and informative about the entire operation, although we find that we must occasionally interpret his propaganda double-talk in order to understand clearly. We are curious to examine some of the papers and cards contained in the banks of cabinets, but we are not afforded the opportunity. We are told that “carefully and painstakingly documented evidence” is piling up in these files.
“What does it tend to prove?” we inquired innocently.
“It proves that the amazing parallel between the Nazi climb to power in Germany and the present-day tactics of the enemies of human rights within our own borders can no longer be denied!” declares our guide.
His vehemence and emotionalism mark his sincerity. He apparently is a victim of his own propaganda. We know that he is talking about himself.
What is done with all the information on anti-Semitism contained in the ADL’s banks of filing cabinets?
We are shown a roomful of girls pounding away at typewriters. Automatic teletype tickets beat a machine-gun racket. Linotype machines pour out molded lines of metal words and phrases. We learn that the printing presses are disgorging tons of newsprint while hundreds of thousands of propaganda books roll through automatic binderies. Clerks and more clerks; busy telephone switchboards. Motion picture sets spring into action at the command of the brain center; Mitchell cameras swing into focus. Miles of film developing in laboratories. Newscasters and commentators at radio microphones; radio towers flashing the ADL’s propaganda to the four quarters of the globe. . .
All this to offset anti-Semitism, we are told.
“Ceaselessly, tirelessly,” boasts our guide, “through one of the largest mass education and public relation programs ever attempted by private groups, the “Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee are engaged in an all-out determination. . .”
His voice is lost in the roar of the presses, the clatter of typewriters, linotype-machines and automatic teletype tickers.
We enter a door marked “PRESS DIVISION, FEATURE SERVICES.” A man is at a desk dictating to his secretary. He pays no attention to our presence.
“Release number 6155,” he dictates. “The following constitutes additional background material on. . .”
“What do the newspapers do with the material you feed them?” we ask.
“Information supplied to the newspapers reaches the public in the form of editorials,” is the answer.
We pass on through a door marked: “PRESS DIVISION, PULP SECTION.” We discover a large work table in the center of the room around which are several copy readers busily at wok. The table is piled high with magazines, among which we see copies of “Famous Western Stories”, “Ideal Love,” and “Crack Detective Stories.”
We are not sure whether the copy readers are searching the pages of the magazines for tell-tale indications of anti-Semitism or cataloging the articles and stories planted by the ADL. We are informed, however, that the “Pulp Magazine Section” is charged with the responsibility of utilizing the pages of the pulps; planting stories and articles glamorizing the Jews. Our guide does not elaborate on how the job is done; whether or not the ADL articles and stories are ever returned with polite rejection slips.
“Pulp magazines,” he declares with a note of finality–”with their enormous circulation carry true stories of American-Jewish heroism in peace as well as in war.”
What other handful of private individuals in the world’s history has had such power at its fingertips? What other private organization can say with assurance that its propaganda reaches the public in the form of newspaper editorials; that it can utilize the pages of pulp magazines?
We are in another room.
“This is the ‘COMIC BOOK SECTION’,” we are told.
“Does the ADL plant propaganda in children’s Comic books?” we ask.
“Comic books,” our guide replies, ignoring the form of the question, “carry strips denouncing native fascists and their use of inter-group tension as a weapon against Democracy.”
The phraseology is reminiscent of the Daily People’s World and Daily Worker. . . “Native fascist,” “intergroup tension,” “Democracy”–brain-blinding slogans from the dialectical lexicon of Max and Lenin.
3
We enter a studio through a door lettered “PRESS DIVISION CARTOON SECTION.” Men are working at drawing boards. Cartoons by Carl Rose and Eric Godall are prominently displayed on the walls.
“Cartoons are very useful,” explains our guide. “Some are prepared by the nation’s most popular artists and decorate the newspapers of the land–pointing the fingers of ridicule and scorn at bigotry and the purveyors of racial hatred.”
Passing on down the corridor we come to a door marked “PRESS DIVISION, BOOKS”. Our ADL spokesman tells us that the Book Section is charged with “exposing the fascist trick of using anti-Semitism in its ‘divide and conquer’ campaign.” We are told that efforts of the Book Section are reaching America’s bookshelves in ever-increasing numbers.
We observe some of the titles of the volumes that fill the book cases. “They Got the Blame,” “Out of the Many–One,” “We Who Are America,” “These Are Our Neighbors,” “Living Together in Today’s World,” ” Brother Town,” “United We Grow,” ” Strong as the People,” “This is Our Town,” “These Are Our Friends,” “Early American Life,” “This is Our Heritage,” “One God,” and “Under Cover.” One of the latest is “Danger on the Right.”
We hurried along to the “Research Division” and into the American Jewish Committee library. We are told that we are in “an arsenal of information”; that the library contains over twenty-one thousand volumes, and more than two million additional items dealing with Jewish problems and anti-Semitism in America.”
“And what is done with all this information?” we ask.
“A special division channels this authenticated material to that group of men and women whose opinions are certain to have a deciding effect on America’s future. . .”
We are now before a door on which is lettered “VETERANS DIVISION.”
“It is of vital importance,” our guide is explaining, “that the American veteran–he who has already risked his life in the struggle against fascism–has come face to face with it and knows it for what it is–should be forewarned of the same danger at home . . . so that he will not have to risk his life again. The fight is being carried on in the American Legion, The Veterans of Foreign Wars and other large Veteran’s organizations.”
No segment of American life seems to have been overlooked by the enterprising ADL and the American Jewish Committee.
We are now in the “LABOR RELATIONS DIVISION.”
“This Division,” our guide is saying, “works closely with both the C. I. O. and the A. F. of L. on the local as well as national scale, determined to prevent the promoter of inter-group tension from spreading their poison through these ranks.”
Our hurried visit to the “Book” section of the “PRESS DIVISION” gave us little opportunity to examine the full scope of the work of this department. We were shown the propaganda product and told that such volumes as “Under Cover,” “They Got the Blame,” etc., were reaching America’s bookshelves in ever-increasing numbers.
The ADL does not go in for book-burning as yet. Obviously such bonfires contemplate a degree of force only found in lawlessness or in the hands of a dictator. Pending such direct and conclusive action–or perhaps we should say in lieu of such action–the ADL indulges in what it calls “book-stifling“. Applied to books displeasing to ADL bureaucracy the “stifling” method appears to be quite as effective as applying the torch–perhaps more so, as it catches the books at the source, cutting off the channels of publicity and destroying retail markets.
“The Conquest of a Continent” by Madison Grant is one example. “The book was driven from the market,” writes Mr. Franklin Hichborn. “Sales were not only restricted, they were stopped.”
How was it done?
The following is a letter signed by Richard E. Gutstadt, on ADL stationary, dated December 13, 1933 at Chicago:
“TO THE PUBLISHERS OF ANGLO-JEWISH PERIODICALS:
“Gentlemen”
“Scribners & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant entitled ‘The Conquest of a Continent.’ It is extremely antagonistic to Jewish interests. Emphasized throughout is the ‘Nordic superiority’ theory, and the utter negation of any ‘melting pot’ philosophy with regard to America.
“Scribners, in a sales circular concerning the book, points to Herr Hitler as the man who has demonstrated the value of ‘racial purity’ in Germany. The Author insists that American development depends upon the elimination of unassimilable alien masses in our midst. This book is considered by some as even more destructive than Hitler’s ‘Mien Kampf.’ Mr. Grant also avers that, ‘national problems are in the end racial problems’.
“We are interested in stifling the sale of this book. We believe that this can best be accomplished by refusing to be stampeded into giving it publicity. Every review or public criticism of a book of this character brings it to the attention of many who would otherwise know nothing of it. This results in added sales. The less discussion there is concerning it, the more sales resistance will be created.
“We therefore appeal to you to refrain from comment on this book, which will undoubtedly be brought to your attention sooner of later. It is our conviction that a general compliance with this request will sound warning to other publishing houses against engaging in this type of venture.”
We are not concerned with the merit or demerits of books. We are presently interested in HOW the ADL operates.
“THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE DIVISION” of the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith concerns itself with transmitting ADL propaganda into foreign languages and planting articles in the foreign language press.
“In addition,” explains our ADL spokesman and guide. “This division keeps a constant check on foreign language papers, representing some sixteen different languages. This check makes possible an accurate evaluation of trends of thought taken by this special group of America’s citizens;”
In the “RADIO DIVISION” we are told that “there is no single road to the American mind,” and “that every road must be utilized.” Consequently the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-make extensive use of radio. In 1946 an average of 216 individual radio stations broadcast ADL material daily. The average is alleged to have doubled since 1946.
“We reach all faiths,” declares our guide. “Programs like ‘The Battle of the Warsaw Ghetto’, starring Raymond Massey, and ‘Behold the Jew’, starring Aline McMahon, reach millions of Americans. . . Where material prepared by this division has been judged pertinent, it has been sought for use by programs such as ‘Kate Smith’, ‘We, The People’, ‘The Doctor Fights’, ‘Mr. District Attorney’, ‘Treasury Salute’, ‘Reunion, U.S.A.’ and others enjoying the largest listening audience in the country!”
4
“What about other religious denominations?” we ask. “Are you able to get to them?”
“More than 8,000 thoughtful men of God of many Christian sects and denominations, disquieted by the hostility stirred up against the Jews, have been able–through this channel–to get the facts for their congregations–ammunition to help in their part of the fight against race hatred. Prominent among the men of religion concerned by this problem, is forward looking Rev. William C. Kernan, of the Institute for American Democracy.”
Our ADL spokesman speaks of the formation of the “Christian Friends of the Anti-Defamation League” as though the organization was a spontaneous movement prompted by “8,000 thought men of God of many Christian sects and denominations”– and that the ADL had nothing to do with its creation.
“This is one of the clearest signs,” he declares, “that all of America is slowly but surely becoming increasingly aware of the true nature of anti-Semitism– and the threat it constitutes to the country as a whole.”
We are becoming familiar with the propaganda tag-lines: “the threat it constitutes to the country as a whole“, “he who attacks one minority group attacks all groups.” In psychological warfare it is known as the AMALGAMATION method in wholesale quantities. “The Smith Act and the McCarran Act,” declare Communist Party propagandists, “are not really directed at the Communist Party! They are directed at labor organizations and minority groups!”
“Just what is the Institute for American Democracy?” we inquire.
“The Institute for American Democracy sponsors hard hitting Democratic propaganda, appearing on billboards form coast to coast. In the transportation systems of twenty-four cities sixteen thousand billboard messages are being displayed. Supplementing its billboard and car-card program, the Institute for American Democracy has produced a series of one-minute films–dramatizing its message, shown as part of the regular feature presentation in theaters patronized by people in all walks of life.”
We had run across this organization in our studies and had learned that it was, like the Institute for Democratic Education, a “front” or subsidized organization of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith. Our ADL friend would have liked us to believe that the two Institutes were independent of ADL control–just two organizations “cooperating fully in this vital battle against bigotry.”
“All of this must cost a lot of money,” we observe.
We catch sight of a door labeled “INTERNATIONAL ACTIVITIES” but our guide rushes us along without an explanation. We are before the department on “INTERCULTURAL ACTIVITIES.”
“This work in school systems,” says our guide, “is coordinated by a special division given over to the development of intercultural relation. Working specifically with the Bureau For Intercultural Education and with educators and leaders of all cultural groups, this division services public and parochial schools, teachers’ work shop, and the publishers of textbooks used in all school systems. The work of every division is subjected to constant tests to determine its effectiveness.”
We move rapidly down the corridor and pause at an oak-paneled door labeled “INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH.”
“The division of Scientific Research and Analysis,” our guide is telling us, “uses campus-tested techniques in measuring the value of methods employed. Trained sociologists–experts in the field of inter-group tensions–are employed and based on findings, constant revisions of conception and approach are made.”
Without pausing in his running account of AJC and ADL activities our guide pauses before another door on which is lettered “COMMUNITY SERVICE DIVISION.”
“It remains for the Community Service Division”–pointing to the door–”to assure that this vast national program will reach every single one in the country.”
Leading us to another door marked “SPEAKERS BUREAU”, he continues:
“One means of accomplishing this is the maintenance of a Speakers’ Bureau. . . which furnishes more than 7,000 Rotary, Kewanis, and other types of audiences with speakers of national reputation, carrying the message of Democracy into individual communities. Spread coast to coast, the community Service Division is subdivided into 14 regional offices, and maintains an additional 2,000 key men in 1,000 cities through the country.”
“What do these 2,000 key men do?” we ask innocently.
“They helped handle more than 4,000 individual cases of anti-Semitism during the past year. The American Jewish Committee and and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith are forming a protective shield across the nation. . . The fight costs money. Full continuation of it requires contributions . . . I shall not insult your intelligence by repeating countless reasons why you should contribute to this year’s Joint Defense Appeal. Suffice it to say that as JEWS you will want to give. As AMERICANS you can do no less. It is your duty!”
An example of the technique of Jewish exploitation of Jews is a letter dated July 7, 1962 on the letterhead of the United Jewish Welfare Fund, addressed to Jewish insurance underwriters.
The letter follows:
“Dear Fellow-Underwriter:
“May I apologize for our failure to contact you personally relative to your contribution to the United Jewish Welfare Fund? I know you will understand because we, like you, have a living to make.
“Although the worthiness and the need of this cause need no amplifying, let me give you one example—the attached is a true and shocking story. It touches everyone of us, whether we are in Life, Casualty or any other type of insurance business. The anti-Semites who publish the dangerous filth described herein are well-financed. They have no trouble raising funds. But the source of funds to combat them–your United Jewish Welfare Fund—finds it much harder to get support.
“We are critically behind schedule in meeting this year’s minimum quota, not only to combat anti-Semitism, but to support such other agencies as: taking care of the Jewish needs of men and women in uniform: supporting over 30 of our local agencies, saving lives of Jews in Israel, Europe and the Moslem World.
“Will you do your part? At this writing your contribution has not been received. I join with your colleagues in the Insurance Division in urging that you read the attached folder, then promptly make your gift to the United Jewish Welfare Fund—and make it generous enough to enable us to conquer the hate that threatens us all.
“Your pledge card is enclosed. Sign it for the maximum amount, keeping in mind that you may pay your contribution in monthly or quarterly installments. Please take care of this matter today so that we may all go back to the business of selling insurance.”
Enclosed with the letter is an expensive–and alarming–five page folder. In red and white ominous lettering against a black background is the legend “Violence Against The Jew.” Superimposed over a mass of wriggling arrow-pointed white lines is a red curling, snake-like figure. The overall effect is designed to be frightening. The recipient of the folder is led to believe that the drawing is the work of some sinister, blood-thirsty anti-Semite rather than the propaganda “art-work” of the United Jewish Welfare Fund.
Reproduced throughout the folder are the title pages of a number of booklets dealing with Jewish Questions. Not a single title page reproduced indicates violence against the Jews. The overall effect of the folder,however, conveys the terrifying idea that all Jews are in deadly peril.
The second page of the folder warns: “Make no mistake: On every side there is danger to our homes and families.” The word “danger” is in inch-high, blood-red quivering letters.
The psychological reaction to this sort of propaganda is obvious. The average uninformed American Jew is immediately confronted with visions of pogroms and mob violence–terrorized by the thought that the ordinary protections of government will be denied him–that only the Jewish agencies stand between him and doom!
5
We were back in the clear, clean air of America as the double doors marked American Jewish Committee and Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith close behind us. We had just seen the inside working of a private espionage and propaganda agency an agency organized with and maintained by private contributions; the nerve center of a world-wide net-work whose tentacles reach into every Gentile activity.
In the “Fact-Finding, Legal and Investigative Divisions” we learned of the organizations’ second (and perhaps most important) activity–the collection of files on so-called “anti-Semites”. We had a glimpse of the extensive rows of cabinets containing data on thousands of individuals who , for one reason or another, qualify by ADL standards as anti-Jewish, actually or potentially, YOUR name may be included.
The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the American Jewish Committee do not have any excuse whatever for their operations. Their secret agents spy upon American citizens. They penetrate the political field injecting racism into political campaigns. Through their multitudinous controls of the media of communication they are capable of destroying reputations and silencing all rebuttal. By “book-stifling” and the American Jewish Committee technique of “quarantine” (silent-treatment), critics are denied a public audience for either attack or defense.
The amazing part of the whole sordid story is the fact that Americans–including American Jews–know so little about it. Those who have had occasion to learn a little of ADL and AJC operations are fearful to do or say anything about them. Legislators who have some knowledge of the facts are fearful of taking any action because they well know that they would be smeared as “anti-Semites” in the next election. No newspaper will risk its advertising contracts by telling the story.
The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is probably the largest and most efficient private gestapo in the world today and, without doubt, the largest of its kind in the history of the world. And–amazing as it may be–this vast interlocking system of departments, sections and divisions is devoted to but one issue–and only one issue despite propaganda to the contrary–political conquest in the name of Racism!
The international character of the network of Zionist organizations is obvious. Among the hundreds of American Jewish organizations flourishing in the United States today, only one stands out clearly as basically American. The American Council for Judaism has had the courage to proclaim its political loyalty to the United States, and its spiritual loyalty to Judaism. It has met with abuse and condemnation at the hands of the Zionists for its patriotism. Ignoring vicious attacks it dares stand for what is best for the United States rather than what is best for Israel. It dares plead justice for the Arabs.
We are beginning to understand something of the magnitude of the ADL’s operations. We are beginning to appreciate its vast spy-network sprawling across the nation and throughout the world. Our imagination is staggered by it apparent control of the avenues of communications. We pause to remember that we are dealing with a private organization, financed by contributions wrung from American Jews–American Jews cut off from the healthy intercourse of American life by the alarm-trumpets of fear and suspicion.
We remember the provocative phrases of our ADL spokesman: “native fascists”, “racial hatred”, “anti-Semites”, etc., and we suddenly recall that He who loved all mankind said: “These Things I Command You , That Ye Love One Another.” We ponder the psychological reaction of one who is branded “a native fascist” and a “bigot“; whether or not such a person is hardened in his bigotry or suddenly transformed into the quintessence of brotherly love. Robert Herrick paraphrased Ausionius when he declared that “love begets love.” It would appear that the ADL is more motivated by Econchar Lebrun-Pindare’s harsh admonition “let us be brothers–or I’ll cut your throat“, than the gentle command to “love one another.”
+ + +
From ”A History of Hate for Christian Values”
- 1971: After ten years lobbying, B’nai B’rith Canada and the Canadian Jewish Congress persuaded Ottawa to enact their federal “anti-hate” law, the Canadian Human Rights Act. Its Sec. 319 and subsequent provincial hate laws criminalize any speech even “likely” to cause hatred or contempt against specially federally protected groups-especially homosexuals, Jews, Muslims, immigrants, but never Christians.
- 1985: ADL began massive programs to end “bias,” “hate,” and Christian “homophobia” in American businesses, local governments and schools. Since its inception, ADL’s World of Difference program has instructed, according to ADL, “more than 375,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, responsible for nearly 12 million students” toward “tolerance” of homosexuality.
- 1988: ADL sponsored a nationwide competition open to all law students in America, to craft a “model” anti-hate law for the US. Jewish law student Joseph Ribikoff won first prize with his proposal to criminalize all Christian/conservative leaders who criticize homosexuality as well as all loyal members. Through the 1990s, ADL persuaded roughly 45 states to adopt some version of its refined model hate law. Visit ADL.org for detailed charts about states’ implementation. During this time ADL also established hate law bureaucracies throughout Europe.
- 1990: ADL was convicted in a California court of violating the civil rights of more than 10,000 conservatives, pro-lifers, members of the political right and Muslims on whom ADL had spied over the years, keeping secret surveillance files. My father and I were listed in these files gathered in cooperation with West coast police departments.
- 1990: Congress passed ADL’s Hate Crimes Statistics Act. It mixed synagogue with state, making ADL the hate laws teacher to the US Justice Department, FBI and every police precinct in America. Since then, ADL’s twisted definitions, hate law enforcement methods, and criteria for statistics reporting inform the thinking and reflexes of the US law enforcement system.
- 1998: ADL introduced its Hate Crimes Prevention Act to Congress, confident of easy passage. Republican leaders in the House and Senate instructed everyone to vote for it. Yet independent-thinking Republicans, dominating Conference between the House and Senate, examined the bill closely. Aghast at its sinister intentions, they stripped it out. Since then, ADL’s federal hate bill has been reintroduced and defeated by Republicans in every session of Congress. Today, with a Democrat-dominated government, ADL eagerly anticipates victory: an ADL-dominated hate crimes bureaucracy in America, ending free speech and persecuting Christians from a hate crimes command center in Washington.
- 2004: Acting on authority of ADL’s Pennsylvania hate law, ADL national executive board member and Philadelphia DA Lynne Abraham arrested and imprisoned for 21 hours 11 Christians for the “hate crime” of peacefully witnessing to homosexuals. Penalty if convicted of the seven charges would be 47 years in prison and $90,000 fines each. After 3 months they were acquitted.
- 2004: ADL introduced their No Place for Hate program, which boldly encourages American families to embrace homosexuality, same-sex marriage, etc. No Place for Hate literature is promoted in Barnes and Noble bookstores and at local chapters across the nation. One piece encourages families with young children to invite a homosexual couple for an evening of dinner, fun and fellowship. This, ADL says, will help destroy any “homophobic” attitudes developing in their young minds.
- 2004: ADL Europe and B’nai B’rith International set up a 56-member hate law bureaucracy in Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). They also persuaded the European Union and Council of Europe to promote the ADL hate law agenda. As part of OSCE, ADL created the International Network Against Cyber-Hate (INACH) dedicated to ending online “hate speech” (really, free speech, such as criticism of homosexuality and Israel).
- 2006: ADL persuaded Congress to create its Global Office of Anti-Semitism in the US State Department. Every year this ADL front reports on an “epidemic” of anti-Semitism gleaned from ADL statistics gathered worldwide. In last year’s report to Congress, it accused Christians who believe the New Testament account that Jewish leaders had Christ crucified of being “classic anti-Semites”- as was Adolf Hitler. In Canada, any public statement that Jewish leaders killed Christ is considered the hate crime of anti-Semitism, punishable by a minimum $5,000 fine and prison if repeated.
- 2007: The ADL-inspired Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Act was introduced into Congress. It would set up a federal commission to study and make legislative recommendations to Congress on how to end Christian, conservative, and far right “hate speech” that streams the internet, possibly inciting violent hate crimes. It was unanimously passed by the House.
- 2008: ADL, through Jewish lesbian activist and state Rep. Sheila Kuehl helped pass California’s SB777, banning criticism of homosexuality in public schools. If any child now criticizes sodomy, he will be expelled. If a teacher or administrator does, they are fired. At the same time, ADL submitted an extensive amicus brief to the California Supreme Court in favor of same-sex marriage. It undoubtedly influenced the Court’s pro-homosexual decision.
- 2009: With another Jewish activist group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL directed Missouri state police to consider white Christian conservatives, Ron Paul supporters, tax and immigration protestors, pro-lifers, etc., as possible domestic terrorists. Soon after, Janet Nepolitano, who recently delivered an extensive and flattering speech to an ADL convention, issued a very similar directive from the Department of Homeland security, warning America of this threat from the Christian conservative right.
- 2009: ADL’s federal hate crimes bill passed the House of Representatives 249-175. The Senate version will probably be considered in the Senate Judiciary Tuesday, May 12 at 10am EDT.
ADL Hate Laws Target Christians
…
ADL is a cesspool of anti-Christian, anti-freedom social “civil rights” initiatives. For decades its pipeline of legislative sewage has flowed directly and interminably into Congress. If Americans defeat one ADL-inspired bill, ADL has lined up six more. But unlike most evangelical Christians, ADL will never, never give up-until it has created an “anti-hate” bureaucracy in America, like Canada’s, ending free speech.
What is ADL’s ultimate objective? National director Abraham H. Foxman, author of Never Again? The Threat of the New Anti-Semitism, is a devout Orthodox Jew. In 1991, he angrily vacated his seat in the Orthodox synagogue of Teaneck, New Jersey, because he felt its members and leadership were not praying for Israel as passionately as they should! Foxman says he earnestly looks forward to Israel’s Biblically prophesied “messiah.”
Christians know this is not Jesus Christ but that prophesied “man of sin” (John 5:43) whom Jesus said Jews would someday accept in place of Himself. Contemporary Jewish activists, like Foxman, think “the messiah is the Jewish people”- i.e., when Jewish power finally ascends over Christians and Gentiles, Jewish power by itself will make “messiah” happen.
Why does Foxman promote homosexuality, same-sex marriage, pornography (he gave pornographers Hugh and Christy Hefner special “free speech” awards)? Why do ADL and other Jewish “civil liberties” groups, such as the ACLU, Southern Poverty Law Center, People for the American Way, etc., do all they can to tear down our crosses, Ten Commandments, manger scenes, Christian symbols and passionately support the killing of 50 million babies through abortion? For that matter, why did the Jewish forefathers of these Jewish supremacists invent and facilitate Communism and socialism (liberalism)-dedicated to breaking down the capitalist free enterprise system? Why does Jewish-dominated media relentlessly corrupt our morals and those of our children, casting aspersions (as in The Da Vinci Code) on the deity and legitimacy of Christ?
Simple.
The Jewish supremacists of ADL/B’nai B’rith know that if Christian nations remain strong, virtuous and industrious, they will never realize their messiah in sovereignty over the nations, ruling the world from Jerusalem.
Even if Christian or conservative leaders know of such demonic aspirations, they will never say it. ADL has them convinced they will be ruined if they do-smeared as “anti-Semites” and abandoned by Israel-first followers who have been conditioned to loathe any hint of criticism of “God’s chosen people.”
If America is to survive, this must change. ADL has brought us the very brink of slavery-intending to herd America into a one-world, international police state. A great abyss of darkness lies just before us.
From Benjamin Edelman’s “Sited Blocked by ADL HateFilter”, 2003
ADL HateFilter consists of two distinct components merged together by the Anti-Defamation League: First, ADL provides a software program called ICRAfilter, developed by the Internet Content Rating Association (a British non-profit receiving funding from, among other sources, the European Union’s Safer Internet Action Plan). Second, ADL provides an encoded list of sites that “in the judgment of the Anti-Defamation League, advocate hatred, bigotry or even violence towards Jews or other groups on the basis of their religion, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation or other immutable characteristics.”
HateFilter seeks to keep secret its list of blocked sites. The ICRAfilter framework provides explicit guidance as to how to do so: the ICRA Template Creation Pack instructions link to a specification for encoding of URLs via hashing. As the Template Creation Pack explains, this process “put[s] each URL through a one-way encryption process” although it note that “Hash is the correct term, not encryption.” (p 11) The Whatis.com glossary provides a more explicit definition of hashing: “the transformation of a string of characters into a … fixed-length value or key that represents the original.”
The ICRA Template Creation Pack continues by suggesting that hashing is “the electronic equivalent of making an omelette; there’s no way you can take an omelette and reverse the process to put the eggs back in their shells.” As described in greater detail below — this claim seems to overstate the effectiveness of the ICRA hashing system.
Partial list of sites that have been blocked by “ADL HateFilter”
http://americandefenseleague.com
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/finalconflict
http://home.arkansasusa.com/dlackey
http://home.inreach.com/dov/cdl.htm
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3319663041501647311
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1920932670630585756
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=976870941610001004
http://webusers.anet-stl.com/~civil
http://www.americandefenseleague.com
http://www.americannaziparty.com
http://www.apopulistreview.com
http://www.bloodandhonour-usa.com
http://www.byyahwehsdesign.com
http://www.childrenofyahweh.com
http://www.christian-aryannations.com
http://www.christianseparatist.org
http://www.churchofthecreator.com
http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com
http://www.demon.co.uk/natofeur
http://www.godhatesamerica.com
http://www.hangemhighrecords.com
http://www.harold-covington.org
http://www.jubilee-newspaper.com
http://www.kinsmanredeemer.com
http://www.kriegsberichter.com
http://www.martinlutherking.org
http://www.missiontoisrael.org
http://www.mourningtheancient.com
http://www.musicalterrorists.com
http://www.nationaljournal.org
http://www.nazi-lauck-nsdapao.com
http://www.neworderknights.com
http://www.officialjohnnyrebel.com
http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com/
http://www.outlawhammerskins.com
http://www.politicalsoldier.net
http://www.posse-comitatus.org
http://www.psychobitch1488.com
http://www.ptialaska.net/~swampy
http://www.resistance-radio.com
http://www.texasamericanknights.org
http://www.texasbestseminars.org
http://www.thulepublications.com
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com
http://www.victoryorvalhalla.com
http://www.whitecivilrights.com
“Daddy, why did those bloodthirsty Jews kill us?”
October 12, 2009
Sex/”Education”
?
In “progressive and enlightened” countries, we have created a senseless, filthy, abominable culture. Our wise men, trained to become leaders of the Goyim will be used by us to influence the minds of the Goyim, directing them towards such understanding and forms of knowledge as have been determined by us.
?
“It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.”
?
Abortion: The Kosher Slaughter
By Jayne Gardener, David Duke.com 2008
Who drives the abortion industry in the United States? Want to hazard a guess?
If you said that the main movers and shakers behind the pro-abortion movement in the U.S. are Jews, you win the grand prize.
While there are, of course, pro-life Jews who are disturbed by the abortion rates in both the United States and Israel, I would venture to say that they are certainly in the minority, especially in the U.S. Their low regard for Gentile life at any stage of development is reflected in the number of abortions performed by Jewish doctors (about half of all abortion providers are Jewish) [1] in Jewish owned “women’s clinics” (about a half of all such clinics are owned by Jews) [2] which is way out of proportion when you consider what a small percentage of our population Jews comprise.
Various people have commented publicly about the disproportionate number of Jews in the abortion rights movement. For instance, Kenneth Mitzner, founder of an organization entitled The Pro-life League Against Neo-Hitlerism said:
“It is tragic but demonstrably true that most of the leaders of the pro-abortion movement are of Jewish extraction.” [3]
First, let’s take a look at the Talmudic view on abortion. The Mishnah, comprising the first part of the Talmud, provides a source for understanding the Jewish position which assumes that life arises only at birth which is when they believe that ensoulment takes place. So long as the fetus, or the most important part of it, its head, has not come out into the world, it is not called nefresh (a human soul) and therefore an unborn fetus is not to be considered a living being until birth.
The Old Testament, in Exodus 21:22-23 shows us that the Jews did not regard unborn lives as human beings as reflected in the laws during that period:
“If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman’s husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life, Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”
“Literally and by interpretation, this passage poses the basic legal principal that the destruction of the fetus is not to be considered punishable murder. Death of the unborn child is punishable by fine only, and capital punishment does not apply. Only if the mother is harmed, i.e. killed, does the law of capital punishment take effect.” [4]
Clearly, the Jewish Talmudic view on abortion is a disturbing one since if a fetus is not considered a living being until birth it can only mean that Talmudic Jews would have no problem with abortion at any stage of gestation for any reason, up until birth. It is unarguable that a fetus is a living being and it is abhorrent to think that pro-abortion Jews would be fine with the destruction of a healthy, viable fetus no matter how late in pregnancy the abortion would take place.
Abortion has pretty wide support among Jews in this country and various Jewish organizations in the U.S. are openly and unashamedly pro abortion, organizations such as:
- American Jewish Committee
- American Jewish Congress
- B’nai B’rith Women
- Central Conference of American Rabbis [Reform]
- Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations
- Hadassah Women
- Jewish Labor Committee
- Na’amat USA
- National Federation of Temple Sisterhoods [Reform]
- National Council of Jewish Women
- New Jewish Agenda
- North American Temple Youth
- Rabbinical Assembly
- Union of American Hebrew Congregations [Reform]
- United Synagogues of America [Conservative]
- Women’s League for Conservative Judaism [5]
Many Jewish doctors as well as non-professional men and women are vastly overrepresented among American proponents of abortion on demand. Here is but a partial list:
“All four original organizers of the most influential group of abortion pushers in the United States — the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) — were of Jewish birth, including now pro-life Dr. Bernard Nathanson.
Dr. Christopher Tietze worked for the Population Institute and International Planned Parenthood Federation, and did more to promote the worldwide slaughter of innocent unborn children than any other person.
Dr. Alan Guttmacher was president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for more than a decade, founded Planned Parenthood Physicians, and did more than any other doctor to promote abortion in this country. He also advocated mandatory abortion and sterilization for certain groups in the United States.
Dr. Etienne-Emile Baulieu, inventor of the RU-486 abortion pill, was born in 1926 to a physician named Leon Blum. He changed his name in 1942.
Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich is the ‘father’ of the overpopulation myth. His ‘work,’ ThePopulation Bomb, was the ’spark’ that ignited the anti-natalist movement.
Lawrence Lader, (New York University professor and co-founder of NARAL) king of the abortion propagandists, has written several books crammed with fabrications and outright lies that have helped advance abortion all around the world… Lader was quoted 11 times in Roe v. Wade, because he had a message that the Justices wanted to hear. (In the same decision, testimony from the world’s leading fetologist, Dr. A. W. Liley, was totally ignored because it decisively undercut the Court’s decision)… Lader also founded Abortion Rights Mobilization (ARM), which sued the Internal Revenue Service in court in a failed attempt to get the tax-exempt status of the Catholic Church revoked for opposing abortion too effectively. He also was one of the leading proponents of the abortion pill RU-486.” [6]
The above mentioned Dr. Christopher Tietze, who died some years ago has left a legacy, albeit a somewhat distressing one. There is a Dr. Tietze Humanitarian Award from the National Abortion Federation which is awarded to doctors in the abortion industry for their contributions to, and advancement of, quality care in the abortion field.
Of course it isn’t only Jewish members of the medical profession leading the way. They have certainly been aided and abetted in their morbid cause by various legislators, especially state senators Anthony Bielenson in California and Albert Blumenthal in New York who were the leading proponents of legalized abortion in their respective states and in this country.
It is certainly a fact that there are other left-wing organizations who are ardent supporters of abortion on demand which have large Jewish involvement, namely The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which has opposed most proposed bills to restrict access to abortion and Norman Lear’s organization, The People For The American Way, which stands firmly on the pro-abortion side.
Not surprisingly, even the Anti-Defamation League sits squarely and firmly on the pro-abortion side of the issue. On April 19th of 2007, the ADL publicly voiced its disappointment that the Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold the federal Partial Birth Abortion Act by saying:
“We are deeply troubled by the ramifications of the Supreme Court’s ruling on abortion. By upholding, for the first time, an abortion statute which contains no exception for the health of the woman, the Supreme Court has undermined a woman’s right to choose and to act in accordance with her conscience and the dictates of her faith. We continue to believe that Americans should have the freedom to make difficult decisions of conscience and health without government interference.” [7]
Abortion rights have pretty much become the litmus test for being an elected Democratic representative in this country as evidenced by the pro-abortion stance of Catholics like Sen. Ted Kennedy and others. “Of the 41 Jewish-born members of the U.S. Senate over the last 20 years, 32 (or 80 percent) have been stridently pro-abortion.” [8]
The radical feminist movement, headed by Jewish women like Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan, has been a staunch driving force behind the pro-abortion movement since its inception. Their disdain for families and imagined female oppression by men in this country and their belief that gender roles are a social construct and not innate has caused them to push for abortion as being the great equalizer, liberating women from their ‘oppressive’ role as mothers.
Simone Weil, former French health minister and Auschwitz survivor who led the drive to legalize abortion in France was quoted as saying: “We are out to destroy the family. The best way to do that is by attacking its weakest member, the unborn child.” [9]
Kate Michelman is another example. For many years, Michelman, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America from 1985 to 2004, has been at the forefront of one of this country’s most contentious and divisive debates. Ever since Roe Vs Wade, NARAL Pro-Choice America, boasting in excess of one million members and supporters, has been the nation’s leading advocate for a “woman’s right to choose.”
NARAL actively supports the election of pro-abortion candidates through various political action committees. They are heavily invested in lobbying Congress to fight any anti-abortion legislation as well as supporting bills which would protect abortion rights and expand women’s access to “reproductive health care.”
The Lichter-Rothman (both Jewish by the way) study was officially suppressed and one can well imagine why. It’s information regarding members of the media and their proabortion stance was staggering, but not surprising. It’s findings?
“Leaders of the motion picture industry: 95% pro-abortion, 62% Jewish:
Leaders of the television industry: 97% pro-abortion, 59% Jewish:
Leaders of the news media industry: 90% pro-abortion, 23% Jewish.” [10]
Jewish groups are constantly involved in fundraising efforts to keep abortion rights in the forefront, spending tens of millions of dollars to ensure that abortion remains legal. On February 28th, 1989, The American Jewish Congress ran a full page ad in the New York Times entitled Abortion And The Sacredness Of Lifewhich cost them a staggering $30,000.
Securing the right to kill unborn children comes with a high price tag.
The press often gives pro-abortion Jews considerable coverage as well as considerable leeway. When Dr. Barnett Slepian (an abortion provider who was later shot to death by an anti-abortion activist) slugged a pro-life demonstrator over the head with a baseball bat (causing serious injury) for daring to picket his home, they not only demonstrated a double standard by excusing his behaviour, they also claimed that he was targeted for picketing because he was Jewish and therefore the actions by pro-life proponents were anti-semitic.
Marilynn Buckham, an abortion clinic owner told the Buffalo News that the picketing of Slepian’s home was nothing short of religious persecution and attacked Christians for not respecting other people’s relgious beliefs. As a result of Slepian’s assault trial, the picketing of abortion provider’s homes in New York state was declared unlawful and subject to a $500.00 fine and 6 months imprisonment.
In Canada, the leading proponent of abortion is Dr. Henry Morgentaler, another concentration camp survivor who became one of Canada’s most proficient, prolific and notorious abortion providers who flaunted Canadian law and established illegal clinics in Canada where he performed abortions in direct opposition to Canadian law and for which security was provided by Canadian police. Morgentaler was once quoted as saying: “It took me years to get rid of this image [of myself helpless in the concentration camps]. And to do that, it was absolutely necessary to oppose authority — whatever the authority may be.” [11]
It is a sad reality that Morgentaler has become somewhat of an icon in Canada, a man who is revered as being a champion for the rights of women. In 2005, Henry Morgentaler, at that time 82 years old, was given an honorary doctorate in law by the University of Western Ontario. Morgentaler spoke before the audience, saying he shared in the celebration of those receiving their degrees and told them that he believed that his work to make abortions safe and legal has “benefited society”, urging the graduates to stand up for their rights. Polls show that the vast majority of Canadians are pro-abortion and certainly many Canadians hold that view largely due to Henry Morgentaler’s influence.
And there you have it. Although it is absolutely factual that there is considerable gentile involvement in the abortion industry in this country there is certainly a disproportionate representation of Jews as proponents of abortion rights as well as Jews accounting for about half of all abortion providers and clinic owners; a staggering fact considering that Jews in this country comprise only about 2% of the population.
And why is this the case? Because they hate Gentiles and promote our destruction by any means at their disposal. Obviously there are Jews who oppose abortion but there are certainly many who not only condone it but push for it. And they not only push for it in the early stages of pregnancy but a lot of them have no qualms about abortions performed at any stage of pregnancy for reasons not encompassed by maternal risk or gross fetal abnormality. They are fine with it at any time for any reason.
It is just another part of the Jewish supremacist agenda to destroy their enemy, the Goyim, no matter what they must do to secure our destruction. We are what stands in the way of the successful achievement of their agenda.
…
Jewess crosses the seas looking for Christian babies to slaughter.
A Polish “shiksa” being “educated” on board.
The Judeo-Masonic pro-abortion group Women on Waves anchors its death ship in international waters. Rebecca Gomperts, the Christian baby-killing group’s founder claims that “Obama’s leadership has only empowered anti-abortion forces. … Now that Obama is protecting women’s right to chose the number of threats and cases of harassment has tripled. … We see a lot of aggression now at protests in countries like Poland and Ireland.”
“She’s fearless,” says Tom Levin, Gomperts’s boyfriend, a Princeton professor. “She’s a person who, without being reckless, is willing to take risks.”
In Ireland, there is a constitutional amendment banning abortion, so for Gomperts, Ireland was the main target.
Gomperts says that her sense of purpose stems from her experiences during medical internships in Surinam, Romania and Guinea. In 1997, she learned to do abortions and was surprised to find she liked it. “The procedure itself isn’t particularly interesting, but the moral and political issues surrounding it are,” she says. “It’s such a simple thing.”
One of Women on Waves complaints is that “antisemitism” has prevented them from slaughtering as many Christian babies as they would they would like to. [From their website: "The antis shout threats at the ship 'You look like Jews!', 'Torpedoes are coming your way from Hell! ... The harbour master visits the ship. We are ordered to pay a fine of 3.000 euros for sailing into the harbour without permission. ... The LPR, the League of Polish Families, an organization that claims to uphold family values but in fact is deeply anti-democratic. They continually yell at us, is 'See you in Auschwitz!' it seems to be their favourite slogan."]
Gomperts describes most of the countries she’s targeted as developing nations. “We’ve been accused of being a neocolonialist organization,” Gomperts says. ”And that’s weird to me. We’re not going out to show the world how good we are.”
Gomperts also plans to take an abortion train to predominantly Muslim, Orthodox Christian and Roman Catholic Albania. Other targets have been: Roman Catholic Poland, Roman Catholic Argentina Roman Catholic Portugal, Roman Catholic Malta and Roman Catholic Chile.
The Deputy Prime Minister Malta has threatened to prosecute anyone cooperating with Gomperts should the ship stop there.
The death ship sailed to Poland in 2003. In 2004, their attempt to enter Portuguese waters was blocked when the government refused to allow them entry, and physically blocked their ship with a Portuguese warship. In 2008, in Spain, “a group of 40 feminists gathered to counter pro-life protests, which brought out four times as many people. They passed out boxes of matches with the picture of a burning church and the caption, ‘The only church that brings light is the one that burns. Join us!”
The floating slaughterhouse is strongly supported by globalist “charities” such as Hivos (which in turn is funded by the EU, the Rockefellers, the Ford Fpoundation, and the Dutch National Lottery) and the Mondriaan Fondation (which is in turn funded by the Bilderbergers’ Prince Claus’s foundation.
‘Abortion ship’ sails into Christian storm
By John Lichfield, The Independent (UK), July 29, 2009
Even the law of the land has never been able to stop Rebecca Gomperts.
…
Gomperts, 43, has become both a global heroine and a global figure of hate since she announced in 1999 that she would use Dutch law and the international law of the sea to provide “floating abortions” to women in the Third World but also in anti-abortion European countries, such as Portugal, Malta and Ireland.
…
Previously, Dutch women could obtain abortion pills from their doctor and bring on a miscarriage at home in the first two weeks of pregnancy. … But under a law passed by the Dutch coalition government in May, the prescription and use of abortion pills has been limited to approved clinics. “The change in the Dutch law means that women in other countries would no longer be protected and could be prosecuted if they came to our ship,” Gomperts said…”We have suspended the voyages that we planned this year off the coasts of Nicaragua, Chile, Brazil and Argentina.”
For many years the Netherlands was the paragon of a liberal and permissive society, a model to some and a dire warning to others. But recent years have seen a shift in the political consensus towards a more restrictive approach. This has partly been driven by the rise in the crime rate and increasing drugs problems but there has also been a complex shift in the once stable pattern of Dutch politics.
Gomperts says that she believes that the new abortion law was driven by party political or coalition pressures, rather than by a genuine change in the Dutch consensus. For the past three years the Dutch government has been a hybrid coalition of large centre-right and centre-left parties and a small Christian party, the Christen Unie or Christian Union. “There is a growing tendency towards restriction and intolerance since the Christian party came into government,” Gomperts said.
…
Women on Waves originally envisaged a whole fleet of abortion ships constantly cruising the world, offering surgical abortions by trained doctors. A movable abortion surgery was constructed out of a ship’s container.
…
Gomperts…claims that her greatest success was to change the abortion law in an EU country. “The visits of our ship helped to start the campaign which led to a referendum decision to legalise abortion in Portugal in 2004,” she said.
Jewish Women’s Archives
American women have been the “perennial health care reformers.” According to Carol Weisman, professor of Health Policy at the University of Michigan School of Public Health: “Activism around women’s health has tended to occur in waves and to coincide with other social reform movements, including peaks in the women’s rights movements.” At all of those pivotal moments, Jewish women have played central roles.
What American Jews Have Achieved For Homosexuality
From Dick Eastman, 2009.10.11
- Larry Kramer: co-founder of “Act Up,” a homosexual/AIDS activist organization; co-founder of the Gay Men’s Health Crisis
- Alan Klein: co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
- Arnie Kantrowitz: co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
- Jonathan D. Katz: founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San Francisco branch].
- Harvey Fierstein: film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay activist.
- Moisés Kaufman: playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
- Israel Fishman: founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of the American Library Association], the world’s first gay professional organization.
- Bella Abzug and Edward Koch: both Jewish: the first members of the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
- Winnie Stachelberg: political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]
- Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.
- Tony Kushner: gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].
- Len Hirsch: president of the GLBT federal government employees group, GLOBE.
- Meg Moritz, Ph.D.: a Director and member of the Executive Committee of GLAAD.
- Barbara Raab: an NBC-TV producer; a “Jewish lesbian feminist journalist, writer.”
- Charles Kaiser: author & founding member of National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].
- David Goodstein: owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate [1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.
- Judy Wieder: Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
- Alison Bechdel [?]: cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly comic strip “Dykes to Watch Out For.”
- Kevin Koffler: Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
- Garrett Glaser: National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA] national board member.
- Ronald Gold: reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn the American Psychiatric Association’s policy that homosexuality is an illness.
- Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany; founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific Humanitarian Committee; coined the term “transvestism”; fled Nazi Germany.
- Fred Hochberg: deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].
- Michael Berman: member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors. Mitchell Gold: HRC Board Marty Lieberman: HRC Board Andy Linsky: HRC Board Dana Perlman: HRC BoardAbby Rubenfeld: HRC Board Andrew Tobias: HRC Board Lara Schwartz: Senior Counsel, HRC Heather Wellman: HRC Field Coordinator Dan Furmansky: HRC Senior Field Organizer, West Sally Green: HRC Associate Field Director
- Rick Rosendall: President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of Washington, DC.
- Barney Frank: member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies [Ran a queer whorehouse from his apartment.]
- Kerry Lobel: executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
- Robin Margolis: American coordinator of the Bi Women’s Cultural Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].
- Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund: and: the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
- Jennifer Einhorn: Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD] Nancy Alpert [?]: Treasurer, GLAAD Judy Gluckstern: Board of Directors, GLAAD. Stephen M. Jacoby: Board of Directors, GLAAD. Matt Riklin: Board, GLAAD Carol Rosenfeld: Board, GLAAD. William Weinberger: Board, GLAAD Tanya Wexler: Board, GLAAD. David Huebner: GLAAD Counsel.
- Richard Goldstein: Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
- Ron Schlittler: Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].
- Craig Ziskin: Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.
- Debra Weill: Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.
- Dody Goldstein: Board of Directors, PFLAG.
- David Horowitz: Board of Directors, PFLAG.
- Shawn Frank: Board of Directors, PFLAG.
- Leon Weinstein: Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.
- Kate Kendell: National Center for Lesbian Rights.
- Gayle Rubin: lesbian author/activist.
- Hilary Rosen: a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund; former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
- Roz Richter: American attorney and activist.
- Bob Kunst: Long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.
- “Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network” [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs: Marty Seldman, president
- “National Gay & Lesbian Task Force” [NGLTF]. Board co-chairs: ….. Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M Dave Fleischer: Director of Training [political training], NGLTF. Craig Hoffman: Board of Directors, NGLTF. Beth Zemsky: Board, NGLTF. Marsha C. Botzer: Treasurer, NGLTF. Jeff Levi: first, Levi was NGTF’s lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.
- Bill Rubenstein, J.D. ‘86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights Project
- Martin Duberman: author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
- Ben Schatz ‘81, J.D. ‘85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Foundation.
- Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk Institute in San Francisco, the world’s largest center for queer studies.
- Sarah Schulman: American playwright, novelist, and activist [one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian rights organization].
- Susan Spielman: principal/head of Common Ground, an education/consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations, helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
- Gertrude Stein: wrote the first openly lesbian novel, “Q.E.D.,” in 1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
- Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.
- Michael Goff: founded Out magazine in 1992.
- Paulette Goodman: founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from 1988-1992.
- Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial Network; president and CEO of out.com.
- Jim Levin: New York gay historian.
- Barrett Brick: GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.
- Robin Tyler: American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington and the national protest coordinator for the “Stop Dr. Laura” campaign; produces women’s comedy and music festivals, and operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
- Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist, molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].
- Mark Elderkin [?]: co-founded Gay.com.
- Leroy Aarons: American professor, journalist, and founder of the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).
- Dr. Donald I. Abrams: American physician, HIV expert, medical marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association.
- Johnny Abush (1952-2000): [Canadian]; archivist of the International Jewish GBLT Archives.
- Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official; appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
- Miriam Ben-Shalom: American Army Reserves drill sergeant and gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the Reserves when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its first president.
- Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].
- Rob Eichberg: American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out Day [October 11th].
- Scott Evertz: American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy [ONAP].
- Gene Falk: American business executive; Senior Vice President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
- Surina Kahn: American lesbian activist.
- Larry Kessler: founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in New England.
- Kathy Levinson: American investor and philanthropist; serves on the board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.
- Judith Light: actress, activist for gay causes.
- David Mixner: gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics; president Bill Clinton’s Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.
- Dan Savage: American author of gay-themed books [The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant; Skipping Towards Gomorrah: The Seven Deadly Sins and the Pursuit of Happiness in America] and gay-themed- sex-advice columnist [Savage Love].
- Susan Schuman: American executive vice-president and general manager of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
- Scott Seomin: American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
- Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg]: Founder and coordinator of the Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.
- David Sine: American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian cable TV network.
- Rex Wockner: Longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news for the gay press since 1985.
- Jack Fritscher: Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine [1977].
- Leslie Feinberg: American trade unionist, transgender activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of Arc to RuPaul].
- Allan Ginsburg: Poet and leading member of North American Man Boy Love Association
And of course there’s always Keanu Reeves husband, and his partner, who helped install Obama.
The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today, by Elizabeth Dilling
Our family trip to Red Russia in 1931 started my dedication to anti-Communism. We were taken behind the scenes by friends working for the Soviet Government and saw deplorable conditions, first hand.
We were appalled, not only at the forced labor, the squalid crowded living quarters, the breadline rationcard workers’ stores, the mothers pushing wheelbarrows and the begging children of the State nurseries besieging us.
The open virulent anti-Christ campaign, everywhere, was a shock. In public places were the tirades by loud speaker, in Russian (our friends translated). Atheist cartoons representing Christ as a villain, a drunk, the object of a cannibalistic orgy (Holy Communion); as an oppressor of labor; again as trash being dumped from a wheelbarrow by the Soviet “Five-Year-Plan”–these lurid cartoons filled the big bulletin boards in the churches our Soviet guides took us to visit.
In the Museum of the Revolution we were shown a huge world map. As our Guide turned a switch, lights came on indicating the places all over the world where Communist Party headquarters were then functioning. Proudly our Guide announced: “Our world revolution will start with China and end with the UNITED STATES”.
“O, NO! Not THAT”, was my thought. But, country by country, the boast has been steadily advancing. I took pictures of the anti-Christ posters on the porch of St. Isaac’s Cathedral in Leningrad.
Russia Changes My Life
We were taken to the beautiful Church of the Redeemer in Moscow which was then, we were told, about to be dynamited to make way for a “Palace of Soviets”. There was a display of full-sized mannikins dressed in the robes of the Church carrying on the Good Friday Foot-washing ceremony. Our Guide rasped: “This was to show that if the Archbishop could wash the feet of the humble priest the poor should endure their sufferings without complaint! Religion was always for the suppression of the people, to keep them working from dawn to late at night under the lash!”
I thought of our Savior washing the feet of His Disciples as an example, and telling them that he who would be great among you should be the servant of all (John 13:13-15; Matt. 23:11). I glanced up at the exquisite stained glass window of Christ, about to be demolished, and a little tear trickled down my cheek as I thought: “I can never hate You like that!” (I did not know then that the Pharisee Talmud gives Him FIVE sadistic deaths today).
Staying at my hotel was the representative of a foreign country. He told me of the police terror; how the last manager of that hotel had been whisked off in the middle of the night by the “Black Mariah”–like millions of others never to be seen again. Some of our party had been taken to the police station; they had laughed in a movie theatre. They were released when they explained that they had laughed at a private joke, not at the picture (which was Soviet-made). After this, and more, I returned to the “NICE” North Shore of Chicago where the “intelligentsia” were rendering brainwashed reverence to the “great Soviet Experiment”.
Lecturing
Behind the backs of the careless Guides I had taken movies of the rickety trains, etc., in Russia. By chance I started showing these movies to patriotic audiences, my husband running the projector as I told the story. Articles written for a little local newspaper were reprinted by the DAR and larger and larger groups called for my talks: District meetings of the Legion; the Military Intelligence; churches from coast to coast. I was recommended for all Chambers of Commerce, and spoke for the Minneapolis, Cleveland, Los Angeles, etc., groups. I broadcast over the Moody Bible Institute radio and its head became my closest friend to her death. Dr. Ironside introduced me as the only woman he had ever asked to occupy his pulpit in the Moody Church. I spoke in the great church of Dr. W. B. Riley, organizer of the World Fundamentalist Assn., my defender to his death. I frequently spoke in Detroit churches and on numerous occasions was entertained at the executives’ table at the Ford plant. Henry Ford (who never changed his mind about the role of Jewry) had me write (1939) a report on the U. of Michigan (80 pages). He contributed that year $5,000 to the cost of my office labor which cost $12,000 that year. The head of the National Sojourners had me airmail my two books to Sen. Royal Copeland to give to Vice Pres. Garner who, I was told, stayed up all night reading them and had his friend Cong. Dies of Texas start up the Dies Committee on Un-American Activities (later called the House Com.) as a result.
The hub of world Jewish anti-Christ power, the financial and industrial power best described in Rev. 18:11-, is the AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE with its B’nai B’rith brotherhood, and its “secret police”, smear and ruin arm, the Anti-Defamation League. After having pushed a reluctant USA into World War II–to spread Communism across the earth, and with its first world base, Soviet Russia, as our “ally”, it was decided to crush all ANTI-COMMUNISTS by trying them as “Fascists, Nazis”. A series of indictments against some 30 anti-Communists, of which I was one, was engineered by the American Jewish Committee, in 1942, 1943, 1944. The 1942 indictment never came to trial. The 1943 indictment was dismissed in Washington by Judge Adkins. Only the 1944 indictment went to trial under a stooge judge Eicher. An unbelievable farce was staged without any legality or fact. After the death of judge Eicher, the case was dismissed by Judge Bolitha Laws with the scathing denunciation that it had been a crime to hold those people on trial all that time without a single piece of evidence in accordance with the charge being introduced by the prosecution against ANY defendant. The Communist press had been gloating that the “sedition trial” was part of the “Moscow Purge trials” then in session all over Europe. I reproduced the item on one of my Bulletins, sent to every Congressman.
Background of E. D.
Travel in more than 60 countries convinced me that the USA had the greatest system of government, and was the most fortunate nation on earth. I did not want it Sovietized, collectivized. Careful research and documentation have resulted in the fact that nothing I have ever printed has, to date, been refuted by friend or foe.
BORN in CHICAGO, daughter of Dr. L. Kirkpatrick, physician and surgeon, of Virginian, Scotch-Irish, Presbyterian ancestry. My mother. Elizabeth Harding, descended from a long line of Anglican bishops thru her father. Her mother, Jane Musquet, was of English-French descent with a Catholic priest uncle in Paris. I married Albert Dilling, of Norwegian Lutheran ancestry. Mother of two children, married and active in Episcopal Church, of which I am a communicant. Graduate of the Starrett School for Girls, Chicago Normal School; Univ. of Chicago student, before and after marriage; pupil of world’s greatest harpist, Alberto Salvi; was concert harpist and pres. of Chicago Harpists’ Society. The RUSSIAN trip ended a musical career and a “nice” suburbanite existence.
…
Chapter 5:
Talmudic Immorality, Asininity and Pornography: The Reprobate Mind
St. Paul, who had been a Pharisee, often bores Christians who do not know what he was arguing about, in his discourses haranguing Pharisees. But one familiar with the Talmud can appreciate his diatribe against the “uncleanness” of those, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie” and: “Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,” until “God gave them over to a reprobate mind … . Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness … .” (Romans 1:22, 25, 28).
Of the “sacred” Talmudic teachings of the “Sages,” preserved since 500 A.D. and taught more widely today than ever before in Talmud-Torah schools in the U.S.A., perhaps nothing better illustrates “fools” with “reprobate minds” than the teaching in the Talmud book of Yebamoth (Exhibit 155) that spittle on the top of the bed curtain proves that a wife has been guilty of adultery, as only lying down face upwards could she have spit up on it. Spitting several feet straight up! The Talmud states: “When a peddler leaves a house and the woman within is fastening her sinnar [breech-cloth] … . If spittle is found on the upper part of the curtained bed she must, said Rabbi, go.” Footnote: “Even if there were no witnesses that misconduct took place.” Further footnote: “Only the woman lying face upwards could have spat on the spot. Intercourse may, therefore, be suspected.”
From a Roof
The Talmud book of Yebamoth also concerns the duty to marry a brother’s widow who is childless. Two volumes of junk and obscenity for its own sake carry the title, Yebamoth. Another illustration of the “reprobate mind” is the teaching that [Yebamoth 54a] if a man falls from a roof “and his fall resulted in accidental insertion,” as [Ybamoth 54a footnote] “When in a state of erection the levir fell from a raised bench upon his sister-in-law who happened to be below.” Here the great Talmudic “saint” Rashi is cited as authority. “His commentary on the Talmud is a consummate masterpiece, a remarkable and gigantic work,” says the 1943 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia. Rashi was born in Troyes, France, 1040, and died there in 1105.
The above Talmud passage is not reproduced here. It is in Yebamoth 53b-54a (page 356 of the Soncino edition) and continues the above with the responsibility of a “levir” or brother-in-law “when, for instance, his intention was intercourse with his wife and his sister-in-law seized him and he cohabited with her.” [Yebamoth 54a] The passage is merely an excuse to indulge the “reprobate mind” in uncleanness. (Romans 1:28) Is it any wonder that Christ likened Pharisees to “unseen graves” (Luke 11) and “whited sepulchres” (Matt. 23)?
Bestiality
Although Moses commanded that if a woman have intercourse with a beast, both should be killed (Leviticus 20:16), and that a priest must not marry a harlot or woman who is profane (Lev. 21:7), the Talmud teaches that “unnatural intercourse does not cause a woman to be forbidden to marry a High Priest,” since then “you will find no woman eligible … .” (See Exhibit 157, from the Talmud book of Yebamoth, Folios 59a-59b)
Rulings of the “sages” follow: “A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a priest — even a High Priest.” Unless specifically warned in advance and the act seen by two witnesses, she is acceptable also. If she had intercourse with a dog while sweeping the floor, she is likewise reckoned to be pure, and suitable. For, “The result of such intercourse being regarded as a mere wound, and the opinion that does not regard an accidentally injured hymen as a disqualification does not regard such as intercourse either.” (See Exhibit 158)
This alone gives a fair idea of the systematic deformation of Scripture by the Pharisees and the truthfulness of Christ’s denunciations about their making God’s commandments of none effect by their Tradition. (Matthew 15:6)
Babies
Baby boys may always be used as subjects for sodomy by grown men, according to the Talmud. (See Exhibit 54) The Pharisaic subterfuge here is that until a child reaches sexual maturity, capable of sexual intercourse, he or she does not rank as a person, hence Biblical laws against sodomy (pederasty) do not apply. Throughout the Talmud “nine years and one day” is the fictitious age of male maturity.
Likewise, under “nine years and one day,” the “first stage of intercourse” of a boy with the mother, or any grown woman, is harmless, Talmudically. Shammai, to seem more “strict,” lowers the age to eight years in some cases. (See Exhibit 82 from Sanhedrin 69b of the Talmud)
A long harangue about the amount of the Kethubah (payment if divorced) a woman gets if her virginity was removed by a young boy, fills Kethuboth I lb of the Talmud. [page 23] (See Exhibit 136 and Exhibit 137) And here, the foul mother may be reckoned “pure,” depending on the age of the child. Such degrading use of children was typical of paganism throughout the ancient world.
“When a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this — that is, less than three years old — it is as if one puts the finger into the eye — tears come to the eye again and again, so does virginity come back to the little girl under three years.” (See Exhibit 136, Kethuboth 11b of the Talmud)
This is the standard doctrine of the whole Talmud on baby girls. Sodomy and intercourse with babies is the prerogative of the adult Talmudic man, in contrast to Christ’s beautiful teachings concerning little children.
The following is also typical concerning the fictitious age of sexual maturity of baby girls set by the Pharisee “sages:” “A maiden aged three years and one day may be acquired in marriage by coition …” See Exhibit 55 (Sanhedrin 55b), Exhibit 81 (Sanhedrin 69a-69b), Exhibit 156 (Yebamoth 57b), and Exhibit 159 (Yebamoth 60b); also Niddah 44b.
Baby girls of three can invoke sadistic punishments on those who have intercourse with them when they are “Niddahs” (menstruating), a physical impossibility, of course. (Talmud, Sanhedrin 55b – Exhibit 55; Sanhedrin 69a – Exhibit 81)
And, at three, a baby girl is always rated as “one who is fit for cohabitation — that is one who has attained the age of three years and one day.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 60b, Exhibit 159) But, in the case of a baby girl who is not Jewish-born, or a so-called “proselyte,” she may be “married” thus by a grown priest: “A proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to marry a priest;” although “one who is fit for cohabitation,” as stated on the same page, is “one who has attained the age of three years and one day.” (See Exhibit 159)
This Talmud Yebamoth passage continues with the ruling in the case of a baby under three married to a grown man priest, and declared eligible to continue as his wife. (See Exhibit 160) The baby girl was a “proselyte,” of course, so age did not matter. But “under eleven years and one day” a little girl “carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.” (See Exhibit 152, Yebamoth 12b of the Talmud)
Adultery is permitted with the wife of a minor, and wife of a non-Jew. (See Exhibit 53) The pretense is that a minor not being a “man” yet, and the non-Jew having non-human status, Talmudically, the Biblical law does not apply.
Thus, once again do the Pharisees make the commandments of God of “none effect” as Christ said. (Matthew 15:6, Mark 7:13)
Incest
Moses ordered the priests that: “They shall not take a wife that is a whore, or profane … for he is holy unto his God.” (Leviticus 21:7) The laws against incest are most vehement: “The nakedness of thy mother, shalt thou not uncover: she is thy mother … (Leviticus 18:7) And in the Talmud the Pharisee “sages” reverse these Biblical injunctions:
“If a woman sported lewdly with her young son, a minor and he committed the first stage of cohabitation with her — Beth Shammai say, he thereby renders her unfit to the Priesthood.” Here a footnote explains that she could not marry a priest, if this made her profane and the above Leviticus 21:7 is cited precisely. (See Exhibit 82)
We then learn that the dispute concerns only the age of the son, not the lewdness of the foul mother: “All agree that the connection of a boy aged nine years and one day is a real connection whilst that of one less than eight years is not [Footnote: “So that if he was nine years and a day or more, Beth Hillel agree that she is invalidated from the priesthood, whilst if he was less than eight, Beth Shamnmai agree that she is not.”] Here silliness reigns supreme, and one understands why Christ called the Pharisees “fools and blind:” “Beth Shammai maintaining, we must base our ruling on the earlier generations” [Footnote states: “When a boy of that age could cause conception.”] “but Hillel holds that we do not.”
The supposition that boys became fathers at eight is the silly excuse for the Shammai school to argue that the boy must be under eight to leave the mother pure. The standard throughout the Jewish Talmud is that a little boy becomes a person, “sexually mature,” at nine years and one day, — another asininity. The whole argument strains at the “gnat” of age and “swallows the camel” of incest between mother and son. (Matthew 23:24)
Incest with Lot
The Bible tells us that after the destruction of Sodom with all of its inhabitants, except Lot and his two daughters who took refuge in a cave: “The firstborn said unto the younger, our father is old, and there is not a man in the earth to come in unto us … . Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve the seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the firstborn went in, and lay with her father; and he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose.” The next night the same events took place for the younger: “Thus were both the daughters of Lot with child by their father.” (Genesis 19:31-8) The abominating tribes of Moabiteg and Ammonites were the products of these two sons, at first spared, then demolished by the fourth king of Judah, Jehosaphat. (11 Chron. 20)
But the Talmudic “Sages” take anything but a critical view of this incest:
“A man should always be as alert as possible to perform a precept, for as a reward for anticipating the younger by one night, the elder daughter of Lot was privileged to appear in the genealogical record of the royal household of Israel four generations earlier.” (See Exhibit 166, Nazir 23b-24a of the Talmud)
Nieces
The Jewish press in 1954 reported attempts to alter state laws so as to legalize marriages between uncle and niece, which is common in rabbinical circles. The Bible prohibits marriages between uncles and aunts, and with nieces and nephews, as incest. (Lev. 18:13,14).
Under “Talmudic Eugenics” in Baron’s A Social and Religious History of the Jews (Jewish Publication Society, 1952), is this on incest: “In Egypt the Ptolemaic rulers themselves, for the most part, married their own sisters. In Parthia-Persia, marriages between parents and children were valid, and those among brothers and sisters were quite customary. [page 24] The Parsee religion … encouraged such marriages as the fittest means of preserving family purity [cf. ‘Yasna’ 12, 9] … . Artaxerxes 11 had married his two daughters, and … Mithraidates I had married his mother. Ardea Viraz is said to have married his seven sisters.” (page 229, Volume 11) This was not harmful, we are told!
“On one point, particularly, Roman law differed from Jewish: marriages between an uncle and a niece. We recall that both Rabbi Eliezer and Abba married nieces, as did Rabbi Jose the Galilean … Rabbi Ishmael made a special effort to overrule his vow [not to marry his own niece] and to make the niece more attractive to him by improving her teeth … .” (page 230, same)
Moses commanded in God’s name, that a woman should not marry her uncle, or a man his aunt. (Lev. 18:14) Nevertheless, today these “People of the Book” are striving to modify American state laws against such marriages, and have actually been successful in some states, on the ground that their “religion” requires such latitude.
Harlots and Dogs
The creative powers were worshipped in all ancient pagan countries as the procreative powers of male and female, with sex rites to match. Men who became priests to the female goddess Venus, Mylitta, Astarte, or by whatever name, in a wild orgy of drugged frenzy would castrate themselves with “sacred swords” and then contribute part of their earnings as sodomists to the upkeep of the pagan cult and temple, and would train, sell and rent dogs for immoral purposes. Girls who became priestesses to the pagan temples earned their keep and contributed to a cult’s upkeep through their earnings as “sacred prostitutes.”
But Moses taught that the worship of God was not to be maintained on such earnings. “Thou shalt not bring the hire of a whore, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow: for even both of these are abomination unto the Lord thy God.” (Deuteronomy 23:18)
The Talmud, citing Deuteronomy 23:19, makes this out of the ruling: “There is not adultery in connection with an animal, because it is written, ‘Thou shalt not bring the hire of a harlot or the wages of a dog,’ etc., and it has been taught: ‘The hire of a dog and the wages of a harlot’ are permissible, as it is said, ‘Even both of these are an abomination unto the Lord’ —the two specified in the text are abominations but not four.” Then the permission is given to use for the temple: “Money given by a man to a harlot to associate with his dog. Such an association is not legal adultery. If a man had a female slave who was a harlot and he exchanged her for an animal, it could be offered.” (Sotah 26b Talmud, Exhibit 168)
Abodah Zarah of the Talmud takes up this same “matter of a harlot’s hire which is permitted — To be devoted to the Temple, in spite of the Law of Deut. XXIII, 19.” (actually, verse 18) The man is permitted to do this: “If he gave her it [the money] and subsequently had intercourse with her, or had intercourse with her and subsequently gave it to her, the hire is permitted. The two matters are regarded as separate and what she received is legally a gift.” This argument goes on for two pages. (See Exhibit 190 and Exhibit 191)
No wonder that Christ charged that the Pharisees nullified the commandments of God by their Tradition, which now, in written form, has become the Talmud.
Permissible Adultery and Intercourse with the Dead
“None of you shall approach to any that is near of kin to him, to uncover their nakedness: I am the Lord,” says the Book (Lev. 18:6). Scripture references are also cited which denounce a married woman who lies “carnally” with a man not her husband. But say the sages: “That in connection with a married woman excludes intercourse with a relaxed membrum since no fertilization can possibly result. This is a satisfactory interpretation in accordance with the view of him who maintains that if one cohabited with forbidden relatives with relaxed membrum he is exonerated.” And other Talmud sources are cited. “The exclusion is rather that of intercourse with a dead woman [Footnote 15] even though she died as a married woman.” Thus one is “exonerated” for, or permitted, intercourse with dead relatives or with relatives, married or single, “with a relaxed membrum,” because “no fertilization can possibly result.” (Talmud, Yebamoth 55b, See Exhibit 163)
Intercourse with dead bodies was an old pagan practice. The above is echoed with some variation in “the chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud,” the book of Sanhedrin. (See Exhibit 89)
There the act of sodomy with one suffering with an incurable disease, hence regarded as already dead, or a “terefah,” is held to be merely “as one who abuses a dead person, and hence exempt.” The explanation, which continues on the next page (not reproduced) is: “Punishment is generally imposed because of the forbidden pleasure derived — [footnote] Whereas there is no sexual gratification in abusing the dead.”
How apt it was when Christ called the Talmudic Pharisees “whited sepulchres … full of all uncleanness.” (Matt. 23) Yet some of His followers call these abominators of every decency “God’s Chosen People” and “People of the Book”!
Polygamy
There is nothing now, as formerly, in Talmudic doctrine, against polygamy. It is practiced by Jews in countries where it is allowed.
A 1952 book by Salo Wittmayer Baron, Professor of Jewish History, Literature and Institutions of the Miller Foundation, Columbia University, is entitled, A Social and Religious History of the Jews and is published by the American Jewish Committee’s Jewish Publication Society of America. The chapter, “The World of the Talmud,” cites the harem of King Solomon (which finished him morally and otherwise), saying its “memory kindled the imagination of polygamous Jews in subsequent ages.” Although we are told [page 25] that there was no real difference between Palestinian and Babylonian Jewries fundamentally, the book states “there are indications that Babylonian Jewish society had more polygamous features than did that of Palestine.”
And: “Anecdotes like those current in regard to Rab and Rabbi Nahman [who] after arriving in a foreign city they used to advertise for women ready to marry them for the time of their sojourn (’man havya le-yoma’) … . In law, too, the Babylonian emphasis lay upon the Jew’s right to ‘marry as many wives as he is able to support.’”
It was Rabbi Gershorn Ben Judah (bom Metz, 960; died Mayence, France 1040), whose edicts were accepted by European Jewry as final for all time, who commanded Jews in Christian countries to stop getting into trouble with the law by polygamy.
Israel first proposed extra allowances for plural wives but now seems to be screening polygamy from Christian eyes.
After the period of the patriarchs, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and before this, in the case of Adam and Noah, monogamy ruled. The Prophets were monogamists. Moses commanded regarding a man of God that: “Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away. …” (Deuteronomy 17:17) And, admittedly, the polygamy of David and his son Solomon ended the Israel twelve-tribe united Kingdom. Their hordes of pagan wives, and foul, pagan altars broke down any Godly spirit which had formerly united them. However, reversing the Bible once again, Pharisee “Sages” embroider upon the above words of Moses against polygamy, their permission to have 18, 24, or 48 wives. (Talmud, Sanhedrin 20b-21a) The Mishna asks: “Why then is it written, neither shall he multiply wives to himself … Rabbi Simeon said: He must not marry even one who may turn away his heart — From which it might be inferred that he may marry a lesser number even if they should corrupt him.”
The Jewish Talmud and Legally Murdering Your Neighbor
As noted elsewhere, regarding murder of the non-Jew, it is good and meritorious, providing you do not get caught and thus get the Talmudic religion exposed for what it is.
However, permissible murder in Judaism embraces more than just killing Gentiles. Murder by suffocation is permissible. Here shyster hairsplitting is inserted in the Talmud, it being permissible to seal up a neighbor in an airtight “alabaster chamber,” providing one does not put in a lighted candle to help eat up the oxygen, but merely allowing the victim to expire by breathing the oxygen up himself unaided, this is acceptable. (See Exhibit 86 from Sanhedrin 77a-77b of the Talmud)
Under Talmudic “law” other forms of murder are also permissible:
* Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of starvation. Just bind up the neighbor before it is hot or cold enough to kill him and all is well — you are guiltless of what follows. (See Exhibit 85)
* Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of sunstroke. (See Exhibit 85)
* Binding up your neighbor so that he dies of cold. (See Exhibit 85)
* Binding up your neighbor so that a lion may kill him. (See Exhibit 85) He could not have fought the lion anyway, so, it is acceptable, says the Talmud.
* Letting mosquitoes bite your neighbor to death. As for the mosquitoes, they come and go, so, since the ones which bit him when you tied the victim go away and others end his life, you are pure and blameless. (See Exhibit 85)
* Throwing your neighbor into a pit and leaving him to die there. (See Exhibit 86)
* Killing your neighbor with arrow wounds. (See Exhibit 86) Shooting the neighbor with an arrow is acceptable, since if there is balsam for sale somewhere, he presumably could have sent for some and thus have been cured instead of dying. (See Exhibit 86)You can also drown your neighbor and yet be “guiltless” of his death! Remember to follow Talmudic law, however, and cause the water to travel a little distance before it drowns the neighbor — then you are guiltless of his death! (See Exhibit 87)
Ten “Innocent” Murderers
It is granted in the Talmud that the Bible forbids taking a man’s life — but that merely means taking his life all by yourself. In other words, you must not take the whole of his life all alone, which permits you, nevertheless, to help nine other men to take a life.
Thus, it is stated in the Talmud: “If ten men smote a man with ten staves whether simultaneously or successively, and he died, they are exempt.” Answering the Rabbi who suggests that killing whatever is left of a man’s life might be wrong, we are also told: “If ten men assailed him successively, he was already nearly dead when the last smote him: therefore the last, too, is exempt.” (See Exhibit 88)
“Mercy” Killings Approved
Elaborate pains were taken, rather recently, by Rabbis to deny that “mercy” killings are permitted in Judaism — because they are. The public discussion was on whether or not a hopelessly sick person should be put out of his misery. The Rabbis denied that would be proper, necessarily know ng that the Talmud states otherwise. The Talmud, Sanhedrin 77b-78a, contains these rabbinical edicts:
“Both agree that if he killed a Terefah [explained in a footnote as ‘a person suffering from some fatal organic disease, recovery from which is impossible’] — he is exempt.” And: “If one kills a Terefah, he is exempt; whilst if a Terefah committed murder: if in the presence of a Beth Din [i.e. a Talmudic law court] he is liable; otherwise he is exempt.” (See Exhibit 88 and Exhibit 89)
Cursing and Striking Parents
“Honor thy Father and thy Mother.” So states the Commandment.
[page 26] The Bible, through Moses, teaches that anyone who strikes or curses his parents is worthy of death.
But the Pharisee “Sages” have nullified that. One may strike parents without wounding them, while they are alive, but there are no limitations upon striking them after death! (See Exhibit 94)
Jews may curse their parents providing they use any term meaning God. (See Exhibit 74) Excepted are the Y-H-W-H consonants of the word Jehovah, called the Tetragrammaton, and which is reserved for use in summoning demons.
As for the “sacredness” of the Tetragrammaton word for Jehovah, the word God is frequently written “G-d.” The Tetragrammaton written in full is reserved for the use of Rabbinical potentates, the Hassidist Baal (Master) Shem (of the Name of God), who by using 14, 42, 72 letter combinations of the name is supposedly able to invoke spirits. At the beginning of the century, according to authorities, about half of Jewry was Hassidist.
The word “God” is not supposed to be written or spoken even today, and the California Jewish Voice, for example, carries articles in which the word is spelled “G-D” throughout. Not piety but sheer superstition governs this.
One of Christ’s major “crimes” was that He pronounced the Name as spelled. (See Exhibit 56, from Sanhedrin 55b-56a of the Talmud) It is there explained in a footnote that “Bless” is used in the text instead of the right term “Curse,” typifying Talmudic double-talk.
Moses said that anyone who cursed or struck mother or father should be put to death. (Exodus 21:15,17; Leviticus 20:9; Deuteronomy 27:16)
“But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say a gift (Or I have dedicated to God that which would relieve your need) … ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother: making the word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have … delivered, and many such like things ye do.” (Mark 7:1-13)Matthew 15 contains like denunciations.
In Matthew 13 and Mark 7, Christ asked the Pharisees: “Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition? For God commanded, saying, Honor thy father and thy mother and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death.”
Then Christ reminded them of the Pharisee custom of dedicating their goods to the Temple, then telling their needy parents that what they might have given them is now the property of God and they must do without, although they themselves went on using the proceeds of their wealth for themselves.
Christ was hated by the pagan Pharisees for such teachings as:
“Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven … except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 5:17-20)
The Talmud Book of Gittin And Some Health RemediesThis Talmud book is about divorce. Reproduced herein are the title page (Exhibit 199) and part of the introduction (Exhibit 200). The book also deals with the fate of Christians in Hell. (See, for example, Exhibit 201 and Exhibit 202.) Following are also various dog and dung health remedies. Exhibit 205, Exhibit 206, Exhibit 207, Exhibit 208, and Exhibit 209 are reproductions from Gittin, Folios 69a-70b, devoted to these dung and dog remedies almost too fantastic to believe. The privy, demons and privates are mingled in insane array.
The funny thing about the horrendous and silly “remedies” of the Talmud book of Gittin, is not the asininity of the remedies themselves so much as the commentary, in English, by a British doctor with a string of alleged degrees, which appears in the Appendix to the Soncino edition of this Talmud book. He actually attempts to justify and praise these nutty things! The wrong people, it is often said, are in asylums.
The “Appendix” (not reproduced) is entitled: “Notes On The Various Remedies Recommended in Folios 68b-70b,” by W. M. Feldman, MD, FRCP, Lond., FRAS, FRS.”
For the “Charms, Amulets, Incantations, Astrological associations,” he finds the benefits of “suggestion” with “profound effect,” and for whatever he cannot evolve a “rational physical basis,” he invents imagined benefits. He points out that “animal excrements as remedial agents” are ancient and we “shall not lightly dismiss the ancient folk remedies — however absurd they may appear.” He extolls the incantations and lauds these Rabbis’ “knowledge of all parts of theoretical and practical medicine, in which they surpassed their contemporaries … .” He refers to several works to study the glories of “Talmudic Medicine” in five pages of whitewash, professing to look down upon “the probable sneers of the sophisticated, but untutored reader,” which should include just about everyone except a Talmudist zealot.
Use of the Bible for Asininity and Obscenity
One is enlightened as to Christ’s denunciations of the Pharisees as “fools and blind” (Matthew 23, etc.) by the following so-called “wisdom of the sages:
Adam’s words about Eve are cited in the Bible: “And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh …” a statement Christ used in His teachings about marriage. (Matthew 19:3-6) But the Jewish Talmud teaches:
“What is meant by the Scriptural text, ‘This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh (Genesis 2:23) This teaches that Adam had intercourse with every beast and animal but found no satisfaction until he cohabited with [page 27] Eve.” (See Exhibit 161, Yebamoth 63a, of the Talmud)
David’s 6th psalm is a plea by David for forgiveness: “Return, 0, Lord, deliver my soul: oh save me for thy mercies sake … in the grave who shall give thee thanks?”
“I am weary with my groaning; all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears.” Citing the above verse, Psalm 6:7, the Talmud “sages” make this to be the meaning: “Even during David’s illness he fulfilled the conjugal rights of his eighteen wives, as it is written, ‘I am weary with my groaning: all the night make I my bed to swim; I water my couch with my tears.’” (See Exhibit 116, from Sanhedrin 107a of the Talmud)
Women who are “unclean” (menstruating) are to remain separate, said Moses, “all the days of her issue,” and this verse (Leviticus 15:26) is cited in the Jewish Talmud, which states, “that a woman is not regarded as a ‘zabah’ [one with a discharge] except during the daytime because it is written, ‘all the days of her issue.’” (See Exhibit 194, from Horayoth 4a of the Talmud)
Typical of the Talmud misuse of the Bible for purposes of inventing obscenity and then giving it a Biblical coating, is the Biblical account about Sisera, head of the Canaanite army, who fights all day and is the only man left alive. He flees to the tent of a supposed friend of the Canaanites, Heber the Kenite. Jael, Heber’s wife, welcomes him in but as soon as he falls into exhausted sleep drives a tent nail through his temple and he dies. She boasts of this to his pursuing captors. Next, Deborah makes up a song of rejoicing in which she embroiders on Sisera’s actual death in his sleep (Judges 4:2 1) and with poetic license sings: “When she had stricken through his temples — at her feet he bowed, he fell, he lay down: at her feet he bowed, he fell, where he bowed, there he fell down dead.” (Judges 5:27) The verbs “bowed” and “fell” are used three times each, and “lay” is used once. This makes seven verbs used in this verse.
The standard Talmud use of this verse is to indicate it as meaning “seven sexual connections.” The same Biblical verse is used thus about Christ. The words: “at her feet he bowed, he fell” are explained as: “Judges 5:27. This is taken to refer to sexual intercourse …” (See Exhibit 108, San hedrin 105a-b of the Talmud)
This is rehashed in Yebarnoth 103a-103b of the Jewish Talmud: “That profligate — Sisera — had seven sexual connections on that day for it is said, ‘Between her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay: at her feet he sunk, he fell; where he sunk, there he fell down dead,” with the footnote giving the Talmudic reasoning: “Each of the expressions ‘he sunk,’ and ‘he fell,’ occurs three times, and ‘he lay’ occurs once.” (See Exhibit 162)
The Talmud book of Nazir reiterates the same Biblical misuse for no reason whatever: “That wicked wretch, Sisera, had sevenfold intercourse with Jael at that time, as it says, ‘At her feet he sunk, he fell, he lay,’ etc. — The words ‘he sunk,’ ‘he fell’ occur three times, and the words ‘he lay,’ once.Judges 5:27.” (Exhibit 165, from Nazir 23b, of the Talmud)
The Talmud book of Horayoth repeats the same obscenity. (See Exhibit 195)
Farming Inferior for Jews
In the course of a terrible prophecy against Tyre, the New York of the ancient world, and reprobate with sodomy, lesbianism, child-burning, and other abominations, is a Bible verse foretelling that “all that handle the oar, the mariners, and all the pilots of the sea, shall come down from their ships; they shall stand upon the land.” (Ezekiel 27:29) The prophecy, including all the details of the preceding chapter were literally fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzar and Alexander the Great. Nebuchadnezzar pounded down the walls of Tyre and Alexander made a causeway of the rocks, killing or selling into slavery the inhabitants, who had taken refuge on an island off shore.
However, the Talmud nullifies and twists these Biblical words, and out of the words foretelling the end of the seagoing trading power, coming “down from their ships they shall stand upon the land,” the Pharisee Talmud “sages” state: “No occupation is inferior to that of agricultural labor, for it is said, ‘they shall come down.” (From Yebamoth 63a of the Talmud – See Exhibit 161)
Talmud Instructions for the Sabbath
No Talmud book illustrates Christ’s depictions of Pharisaism better than the book of Sabbath. He said: “Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.” (Matthew 23:24)
One way to go raving crazy is to study the Talmud book of Sabbath with its rules on what is or what is not permissible on the Sabbath.
Concerning the Sabbath, even the digested laws, or Talmud Mishna in the Schulhan Aruch, take up 82 pages of Volume 2 (pages 63-145). The sum and substance of all of them is a game of subversion. A rule is set up. “How many ways are there to get around it and nullify it?” That is the problem, leading to almost endless trivia and discussion.
Moving a Door Key
One gem concerns the weighty problem of the door key which the “shabbos goy,” or a Sabbath gentile, is carrying home for you so that the Jew is spared that “labor. ”
The Talmud rule is that you cannot move goods from one category of property to another; from private to public property or from what is neither public or private, on the Sabbath. Your doorstep is neither public nor private. The street or sidewalk outside the doorstep is public; your house inside is private. Therefore, says the Talmud, you must have the “goy” not only insert your key in the lock, but push the door in as, otherwise, if you pushed the door in with the key in it, you would be moving the key from property neither public nor private (the sill) to the inside of the house (private property).
The Sabbath Louse-Hunt
“One who searches his garments and finds a louse shall not crack it, but simply rub it with his fingers and throw it away on the Sabbath.” (See Exhibit 6) Throwing away lice is not “labor.” Cracking a louse is to be avoided at all costs, however.
Sabbath IntercourseThe bloody, the sadistic, and the obscene are the darlings of the Talmudic “synagogue of Satan” mentality, the appetite for which is seemingly never sated. To illustrate, eight running pages have been reproduced here on the popular Talmud subjects of blood and intercourse. This discourse concerns whether or not the first intercourse on the Sabbath would constitute Sabbath “labor.” “Is it performed to see if she was a virgin?”, is discussed at length, for example. But the rule which governs is the dominant Talmud rule of the Sabbath on the subject of labor, namely that an act of injury never ranks as “labor.” So, if the intent is to injure the wife the act is permissible. (See Exhibit 122, Talmud book of Kethuboth 5b-6a)
The eighth page ends with the thought that intercourse is permitted anyway. Then a new line of needless, senseless “religious” discussions about women and blood starts in. These longwinded, silly pages of Pharisee “wisdom” are but a sample of the bent of the whole Talmud. (See Exhibit 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, and 141)
Vows
In Matthew 5:34-6, and in Matthew 23:16-22 are recorded the lambastings Christ gave the Pharisees for vowings: “ye blind guides which say, whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it he is guilty. Ye fools and blind: for which is greater the gift or the altar that sanctified the gift?” Christ goes on to illustrate Pharisee silliness. Do not swear by anything, is the gist of theMatthew 5:34 passage, not by your head for you cannot “make one hair white or black.”
One can only appreciate His words after reading hundreds of pages of drivel about vows in the Talmud books of Nazir and Nedarim. (Title pages, Exhibit 164 and Exhibit 170)
The Talmud Mishna on the Heifer and the Door is illustrative (not reproduced). The Mishna opens with the Door saying if the man doesn’t open it, and the heifer saying if the man does not make it stand up, he must be a “Nazir.” (A Nazirite [to vow] was one who had vowed not to cut his hair or drink or eat any product of the grape for a certain time.) Three pages of haranguing “Gemara” following the Talmud . . “Mishna” discuss the fact that the heifer then got up of its own volition. The door is quiet, apparently, for nothing more is said by it. The Jewish school of Shammai holds that since the man did not of his own power force the heifer up, he must be a “Nazir,” but the Hillel Jews say that the essence of the vow is the upping of the heifer which was “recumbent” and is now standing up, so the man does not have to be a “Nazir.” The schools of the Hillel and Shammai were in full flower in the Holy Land when Christ lived and, no doubt, this and other nonsense presently preserved for the Jewish religion, existed then.
Talmud — Juvenile Birth Control and the “Two Hairs” Test for PubertyThe Talmud, Yebamoth 12b, harangues about the ages when female birth control may be exercised, namely from “the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day,” with a child “under or over” these ages to “carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.” The recommended birth control is to be followed because otherwise the pregnant female might have a “second conception” which would make her fetus a “sandal” or “flat fish.” Read the nonsense, followed by the “two hairs” test. (See Exhibit 152)
Read the asinine harangue in the Talmud, Yebamoth 12b 13a (See Exhibit 153), about two hairs proving puberty, or not proving it, as the child may have lost the two hairs through childbirth, also, the calling for an examination by the Rabbis. In the Soncino edition of the Talmud, reference is made to three similar messes of muck in Kethuboth 36a, Baba Bathra 156a and Niddah 52a of the Talmud.
To be unable to tell whether a little girl is as yet adolescent, or has borne a child or not, by counting two pubic hairs, is too idiotic to credit to anything except the Talmudic love of sub-sewer subjects — “the reprobate mind,” as Paul called it, “Who changed the truth of God into a lie.” (Romans 1:25, 28)
To deal in unnatural filth and sex matters is the core of Talmudic “scholarship.”
More Talmudic “Wisdom”
Pretensions of “wisdom” by Talmudic Pharisee “sages” are perhaps the most incredible. No pompous dissertation seems complete without mention of a privy. Sons of “sages” and scholars, we read may “enter and sit down before their father, with their backs to the people.”
When, however, they do not possess the capability of understanding the discourses, “they enter and sit down before their father with their faces toward the public … if he went out to ease himself he may re-enter and sit down in this place. … This applies only to the minor functions of the body but not to the major functions since he should have examined himself before … A man should always make a habit of easing himself early in the morning and late in the evening in order that there be no need for him to go far …” (See Exhibit 197 and Exhibit 198)
Jewish Talmud “remedies” are foolish to say the least. The above passage from Horayoth 13a-b of the Talmud is replete with learning such as: “As the olive causes one to forget seventy years of study, so does olive oil restore seventy years of study. … Wine and spices have made me wise.” (Exhibit 96)
The Talmud “sages” then dispute whether dipping one or two fingers in salt makes one wise; whether passing under the bit of a camel, or under the camel itself, interferes most with mentality. The text then returns to the required protocol for the “Nasi, head of the Sanhedrin, and the head of a Talmud school, the Ab-Beth Din,” and how many rows have to rise in honor when each one enters. (Exhibit 197)
The Talmud also has “wisdom about eating dates.” “They remove three things: evil thoughts, stress of the bowels, and abdominal trouble.” This leads to a play on words, door, ladder and bed, where “one is fruitful and multiplies on it” — back to the old subjects. This is from Kethuboth 10b-11a of the Talmud.
On this same page is the Mishnah (law) that a baby girl under three years and one day old is always reckoned as a virgin: “If they had intercourse before they were three years and one day old the hymen would grow.”
Do not just the few illustrations above from the Pharisee Talmud show the justness of Christ’s excoriations of the Pharisees as: “Full of all uncleanness;” their love of the “uppermost rooms at feasts. . . all their works they do for to be seen of men” — “full of hypocrisy and iniquity?” (Matthew 23:5-6, 27-8, etc.)
And, illustrating their hairsplitting paraded as “wisdom,” He called them “fools and blind.” (Matthew 23:17-19)
Virginity on a Monetary Scale
The Kethuboth book of the Babylonian Talmud (See Exhibit 119 for title page) is supposed to set down rules relating to married life.
The Kethubah is a contract promising to pay a wife a certain sum of money if the husband divorces her, which he can do at will, according to Talmudic doctrine. Perhaps urged on by the growing Christian propaganda against divorce, the Hillelite Jewish school stressed the husband’s freedom to divorce his wife even for some culinary deficiency, or, as Rabbi Aquiba taught, because he had found a better looking woman.
The Kethubah need not be paid if the wife can be proven not to have been a virgin when married. Hence the Jewish custom of the groomsmen waiting outside the bridal chamber door for the bloody sheet to be witnessed, proving the wife’s virginity. Elaborate cuts of these Kethuboth appear in the 1943 Universal Jewish Encyclopedia.
Chicago physician and hospital owner, Dr. A.A. Whamond, used to relate to a member of my family about the money he made by putting in false cat-gut hymens for Jewish girls who were not virgins before they were to be married.
The Talmud price for getting rid of a wife who had been a virgin, is “200 zuz,” given by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia as being 200 denarii or about $30.00.
“If the wife refuses sexual intercourse, she can be threatened with a reduction of her claims in the Kethubah, and this threat can be carried out.” (Same Encyclopedia) If the husband can contend that the wife had not been a virgin, she gets only “a maneh,” or the smallest coin, says the Talmud.
All of this talk about blood and virginity is a favorite Talmudic subject, and seemingly endless. Note, for example, Exhibit 121, Exhibit 122, Exhibit 123, Exhibit 124, Exhibit 125, Exhibit 126, Exhibit 127, Exhibit 128, Exhibit 129, Exhibit 130, Exhibit 131, Exhibit 132, Exhibit 133, Exhibit 134, Exhibit 135, Exhibit 136, Exhibit 137, Exhibit 138, Exhibit 139, Exhibit 140, Exhibit 141, Exhibit 142, Exhibit 143, Exhibit 144, and Exhibit 145 herein, all from the book of Kethuboth.
And, as always in the Talmud, in the book of Kethuboth, asininity is combined with filth. For example, the controlling “Mishnah” or overall rule in Folio 61b (See Exhibit 145) doles out by trades the proper number of relations between husband and wife as: “men of independence, every day; for laborers, twice a week; for ass-drivers, once a week; for camel-drivers, once in thirty days; for sailors, once in six months.”
Sodomy Approved
Despite the thunderings and prohibitions of the Bible, sodomy in general, and specifically with little children, dead bodies, neighbors’ wives and one’s own wife is permitted by the Talmud.
The argument for this last is in Nedarim 20b of the Talmud (page 58 of Soncino translation): “Our Sages said … a man may do whatever he pleases with his wife at intercourse: Meat which comes from the abbatoir [stockyards] may be eaten salted, roasted, cooked or seethed; so with fish from the fishmonger. … A woman came before Rab and complained [of her husband’s sodomy with her], “Rabi replied: ‘Wherein does it differ from fish?”
All of this is made Jewish religious doctrine with full Luciferian knowledge of the Bible’s laws against it.
“Thou shalt not lie with mankind” and the Biblical verse, Leviticus 18:22, is actually cited in the same Talmud section where sodomy with boys under nine or baby girls under three is permitted. (See Exhibit 54) The full text of this verse states: “Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind: it is abomination.”
Small wonder that Christ denounced the Pharisees as nullifying the word of God and violating every concept of human decency.
The Talmud Today
After reciting the denunciations and condemnation of the Talmud down throught the centuries, Rodkinson, in his in troduction to the Talmud, states:
“Such was the past of the Talmud which we hope will never be repeated. Now a glance at the end of the last century and the beginning of this one.
“The colleges for the study of the Talmud are increasing almost in every place where Israel dwells, especially in this country where millions are gathered for the funds of the two great colleges, the Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in New York, in which the chief study is the Talmud and its post-Talmudical literature.”
This was written early in the present century. Is what Rodkinson wrote true today?
The answer is “yes.” Not only are Hebrew Union College of Cincinnati and the Jewish Theological Seminary of America more active than ever, but a network of schools to teach the Talmud to young Jews now exists from coast to coast.
For example, in the Chicago area, the Associated Talmud Torahs of Chicago oversees some 57 schools where the Talmud is taught to young Jews, commencing with their tender years.
If you are told by anyone that the Jewish Talmud is merely ancient history concerning Judaism, don’t be fooled. The Talmud is present-day Judaism and without it so-called Judaism would not exist.
Jewish Professor Boasts of Jewish Pornography used as a Weapon Against Gentiles
Jewish Professor of American History at Aberdeen University in UK, Prof. Nathan Abrams. He boasts that Jews were the driving force of the modern pornographic industry and that their motivation is in part to destroy Gentile morals.
The following is an excerpt from one of the new additions to my book, Jewish Supremacism. It offers more powerful evidence that reveals the Jewish extremist war against Gentiles, a struggle that we Gentiles are not even allowed to know about, much less resist. The new edition of Jewish Supremacism is available for purchase at www.davidduke.com
After learning about the inordinate Jewish involvement in organized crime, historical slavery and modern white slavery, it did not surprise me when I began to learn of their domination of pornography. Just as Jewish scholars faithfully recorded the Jewish domination of the African slave trade so they have also documented their prominent role in pornography.
In a respected and scholarly magazine of Jewish intellectuals, (The Jewish Quarterly, winter 2004) Jewish professor Nathan Abrams in an article titled, “Triple Exthnics,” proudly documents the leading role of Gentile-hating Jews in pornography.
A story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer that the ‘triple exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue’ Jews.
Jewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. …
In the postwar era, America’s most notorious pornographer was Reuben Sturman, the ‘Walt Disney of Porn’. According to the US Department of Justice, throughout the 1970s Sturman controlled most of the pornography circulating in the country. … It was said that Sturman did not simply control the adult-entertainment industry; he was the industry. …
Many are entirely secular, Jews in name only. Sturman, however, identified as a Jew – he was a generous donator to Jewish charities. …
Abrams shows how the corruption and debasement of Gentiles and Christian morality is a primary part of their motivation for intentionally infecting the Gentile community with pornography.
Is there a deeper reason, beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? …
Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.” Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. …
Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. …
Opposition to Jewish extremist subversion of Gentile, Christian or Muslim morality is frequently defined as anti-Semitic “hatred” in the Jewish dominated media. Abrams writing in a Jewish journal for a presumably Jewish audience writes matter-of-factly about the “atavistic hatred” against us by Jewish pornographers and their motivation to “weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion.”
Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having “to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an ‘up yours’ to these people.” …
Obviously, there are no articles in the mainstream media exposing Jewish “atavistic hatred” against Gentiles by the promoters of pornographic depravity. Abrams even goes on to talk about the roots of this revolutionary Jewish attack on European values.
Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. …
Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx. …
In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.
Notice that all those mentioned: Reich, Marcuse, Goodman, Marx, Trotsky, Lenin and Freud are Jews. From Freud to Goodman, all represent a Jewish revolution against traditional European values and morality.
When sick Jewish pornographers are part of the brutality of Jewish organized crime, the results can obviously be horrifically tragic for our people. In 2000, a Jewish “Russian” organized crime ring was uncovered that specialized in kidnapping Russian children, some as young as two years old, from parks and orphanages and then subjecting them to rape, torture and murder, all on video tape. These tapes were sold to thousands of Jewish and Gentile perverts all over the world. When police in Italy were frustrated by lack of action by the authorities they released some of the video footage to an Italian network which then showed some of the graphic images hoping to cause public outrage. Instead of outrage against the Jewish murderers the TV producers suffered outrage for showing the disturbing images.
In spite of the horror and obvious newsworthiness of this international Jewish child porn/murder operation, it received little coverage in the media in the United States. When Seth Bekenstein, the ring’s American distributor was arrested, there was little publicity, and in spite of being a part of one of the most horrific criminal activities imaginable, he was sentenced to only 18 months on guilty plea.
Porn is no longer 1950s pictures of voluptuous nude women on a deserted beach. It has become permeated with sadism, masochism, scatology, even sexual molestation, rape and murder of young children. I am no prude. I love the beauty of the human body. But, I do think that this kind of sick criminal activity, in which there is so much exploitation, so much degradation, so much catering to the depths of human depravity, should be fought with constitutional law.
Ironically, with Jewish influence over media, societal mores, and government today, it is legal, even chic to make and sell the sickest pornography showing the sick defilement of women. But, if you have unacceptable political opinions about Jewish supremacism, you may find yourself a political and social pariah, or at worst in prison. We live in a Jewish supremacist world where often the sickest porn is legal while political incorrect opinions will land you in prison.
“Daddy, why did those bloodthirsty Jews kill us?”
October 11, 2009
Jewish State threatens WW3 for Christmas
What Ahmadinejad said was:
“Imam ghoft een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e Qods bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad.“
Meaning:
“The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.”
In context, he explained that it would “vanish” just as the USSR and the Shah’s Iran and Saddam’s Iraq are now history, and as Taliban Afghanistan is history for now.
“Vanish from the page of time.” Just like the Internazi powers wiped Yugoslavia from the page of time.
When asked about it, Ahmadinejad said that if all residents of Palestine had democratic rights, then Israel would be voted out of existence as a state. Obviously, this is a statement of fact.
Word for word:
“Imam (Khomeini) ghoft (said) een (this) rezhim-e (regime) ishghalgar-e (occupying) Qods (Jerusalem) bayad (must) az safheh-ye ruzgar (from page of time) mahv shavad (vanish from).”
The Latest Jewish Insult to Christ
No, this time it isn’t Christ in a bottle of piss, or joke crucifixions, or the Theotokos made out of elephant shit. No, this time, the State of the Jews — the world’s only National Socialist state — has threatened that if its goyim puppets don’t impose sanctions against Iran by Christmas, then they will violate foreign airspace and will go to war with Iran. This is how they plan to commemorate the Incarnation of the Son of God?
Iran: Israel’s threats inexplicable
Iran’s ambassador to UN demands Security Council take steps against comments made by Ephraim Sneh, who said Israel would attack Iran if sanctions weren’t in place by Christmas
Dudi Cohen, Y-net News 2009.10.09
Iran’s ambassador to the UN, Mohammad Khazaee, sent a letter of protest to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moonin which he wrote that “there is no explanation for Israel’s continuing threats against Tehran”.
He was referring to an interview given by former Deputy Defense Minister Ephraim Sneh to the Sunday Times in which he said that if Iran were not further sanctioned by this Christmas Israel would attack the country.
Sneh told the paper that if Israel were forced to attack the Islamic Republic on its own it would do so, remarks the Iranian ambassador deemed “irresponsible”.
He said he hoped the UN would take steps against such comments. “Remarks such as these, stated once in a while by Israeli leaders, are no more than sorry excuses aimed at avoiding supplying answers regarding Israel’s nuclear arsenal and deflecting public awareness from the crimes and terror Israel commits in the region,” he said.
Khazaee once again stressed that his country’s nuclear program was intended for peaceful purposes and said that “the only threat in the region is Israel’s nuclear arsenal, which remains unsupervised to this day”.
From the “Comments” section, one or two sensible responses and much evidence of some psychotropic drug in the water supply:
- So, leaders in Iran can threaten to wipe out everyone in Israel with impunity [rubbish], yet Israel can do nothing to protect its national interest? Iran threatened no such thing, and Israel ordering its Goyim slaves to boycott Iran is “taking action”? ahmadinejad If it comes to war, Israelis will beat the hell out of you, I mean it. And it won’t take 10 years to do it.
- Iranians, since you hate jews, I remind you that ahmadinejad was jewish. Check his genitals.
- The warning was a favor to the world, Next comes bombs.
- So Israel will attack Iran if sanctions are not in place by Christmas? How will anyone know when that is since Christmas has been replaced by ‘holiday’?
- Iran started all this when it threatened to wipe Israel off the map, not Israel. And now they run crying to the UN. Pathetic little creatures they are.
- This country and these leaders are going to doom as us. i pray that someone with balls stands up to these bullies and put bullets between their EYES. Yes Bullets, not flowers and appeasing words. Unbelievable, what you people are doing to humanity.
- If Israel is waiting on something “decisive” from Odumdum, they are in for a long wait! Israel will have to bomb Iran’s nuclear bomb factories; when Iran overreacts, the nukes will have to come “out of the closet,” and Japan will have “company” in the WBNC, the “We Been Nuked Club!”
- If you don’t like to tango, stay off the dance floor.
- Thank God there is a country in this world that has the intestinal fortitude to confront evil. Israel, many people in the USA are praying for you. … Although our country has lost the testosterone to confront these evils, we thank God you are always there.
- Israeli has only 2 tanker aircraft, a raid by even 4 attack planes would require crews, fighters, rescue choppers all the way in and out, over 24 aircraft over US forces all the way in and back, not possible unless US participates and that would mean Iran attacks Iraq, i.e., the US, not feasible and Iran knows it
- Iran is like a schoolyard bully. The minute you stand up to him and bloody his nose he runs crying to momma. What a pathetic excuse for a country.
- I, for one, support Israel (God’s chosen people) 100%. I pray that they take out the corrupt Islamic regime while they’re at it.
- So it’s ok for Iran’s pres to deny the holocaust, refuse to acknowledge Israel’s right to exist, make threats, etc,…but Israel can’t defend itself with a pre-emptive attack…?
- Why are you publishing this… and giving voice to the lying, and genocidal regeme in Iran?
- Do ahmadarejendeh and his ilk believe seriously that Israel will not use his 200+nuke s against Iran if it is attacked with non conventional weapons ? in what world does like these cranks; time to bomb them into reality!
- Be afraid Mohammad, be very afraid.
- Iran has repeated called for the annihilation of Israel as a state, and that they want to wipe them off the map.
- All Israel ever does is protect itself from attacks, and the wack jobs in Iran, that continually state that they will destroy your country!
- The Iranians have continously threatened to attack Israel for years, but when an Israeli leader says it back, they call it irresponsible. Iran acts like it is totally innocent for all the acts of violence it has been responsible for since the revolution worldwide. They are the aggressors
- The Iranian government has been espousing war-like rhetoric against Israel (”wipe Israel off the map”) for years.Israel has the right of self defense against a clear and present danger like Iran….before Iran gets the nuclear bomb it’s trying to develop….BTW, I’m not Jewish
- Iran’s leader has called Israel illegitimate. Iran’s leader has called Israel a stinking corpse. Iran’s leader has denied the Holocaust … Iran’s leader has threatened to wipe Israel off the map.
- the president of Iran and his underlings have repeatedly said Israel should be destroyed, wiped off the map and the pages of history
- Has the world gone insane? For how many years have we heard from Iran how they want to obliterate Israel?
- Let’s not waste any more time. Push the button and lets get this over with.
- daily threats from isreal to iran only shows who the agressor is. and with their WMD and past behavior towards their neighbors who could blame iran if they did build a bomb
- I think we’re already too late to stop the Iranian tiger. The world had a chance to snuff the beast when it was a cub. Now, because of the ineptitude and inaction of the UN and world leadership, the beast is nearly full-grown. Even if Israel is, by the grace of God, untouched, a nuclear-capable Iran will bring much suffering to the world. After all, Ahmadinejad believes his destiny is to reveal the hidden imam. He WILL use Iran’s weapons to this end. Weakness and sanctions have gained the world nothing.
- Israel I am SO SORRY. I am not a Jew. I am a Catholic and a staunch supporter of the State of Israel. I am sorry my country chose an obvious anti-Semite as president. … Good soldiers will die because this chronically selfish little man has no soul. There is no doubt about it, you are officially alone. Take some solace in the fact that Bibi is not testicularly challenged like the effete one in the White House. … Good luck, Israel. You are going to need it.
- Myths about Iran: Belief: But didn’t President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threaten to ‘wipe Israel off the map?’ Reality: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did quote Ayatollah Khomeini to the effect that “this Occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time” (in rezhim-e eshghalgar-i Qods bayad as safheh-e ruzgar mahv shavad). This was not a pledge to roll tanks and invade or to launch missiles, however. It is the expression of a hope that the regime will collapse, just as the Soviet Union did. It is not a threat to kill anyone at all.
- http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl/10-lies-about-iran.html
- My prayer is that El Shaddai will watch over Israel and bless her.
- Our USA alliance with Israel is not what it used to be, all prizes aside. With Obama in office, Israel is essentially on their own … I have never witnessed Israeli hostility towards the people of Iran … Israel, you are on your own. Act. And God Speed!
- Attack Iran??? How?? I would really like to see this. How will the IAF get thee through US controlled airspace or hostile foreign airspeace? Oh yeah, I forgot, they have dual national dupes in places of power in Turkey and Georgia… What happens if Iran has aquired some of those pesky little S-300’s? Want a hint? The IAF will be blown from the sky. Iran isn’t Jericho and I don’t think God is on your side this time.
- Why Wait Till Christmas? A Christian Festival! I for one cant wait…
- isreal needs an enima. isreal cannot go around threating other countries. under the bush doctrine, iran would have every reason to attack isreal first. hey jew people in isreal go back to making porn…
- Christmas. Jews do not even believe in Christmas. What is going on here?
- What about the constant threats of “wiping Israel off the map very soon”? coming regularly from Iran.
- I hope Israel knocks their teeth out.
- If Israel wants to stop Iran, hit them where it really hurts. Destroy their oil-producing infrastructure.
- You guys are hilarious– a bunch of armchair soldiers “supporting” Israel from the comfort of your keyboards. … I’m assuming Israel is just trying to strong-arm the West into supporting the sanctions. If Israel actually does attack, they may turn “wipe Israel off the map” into a reality. Because a) Iran 2009 isn’t nearly as weak as Iraq 2003; and b) Israel 2009 isn’t nearly as strong as USA 2003– i.e., they can’t throw the troop numbers or weapons sophistication at the problem that the USA did; and c) Iran will have the capacity to strike back at Israel. There is absolutely no way an Israeli attack on Iran will go well for either country… but it will be worse for Israel in the long run than it will be for Iran.
- All I can say to Iran is, if you can’t back up what you talk, then stop talking. Play with the big boys, or get off the sidewalk.
- Israel is a danger to the world peace. Israel has nuclear weapons and makes threats against all its neighbors in the middle east. Israel is only country which has defied so many resolutions in the UN and is in violation. It’s the only nation which has killed innocent children and has attacked UN compound numerous times. It is the only country occupying illegal territory and building illegal settlements. This nation is a expansionist state and will continue to make wars to capture more land for it’s expansion.The neighbors of Israel will continue to pursue for nuclear weapons until Israel is forced to get rid of their nuclear weapons.
- Just US is fighting wars all over the world for Israel.
- Any attack on Iran will be a violation of international law and a crime against humanity. The continued threats by Israel to bomb Iran are sufficient to allow Iran to make a preemptive attack on Israel. The US should stop defending Israel by using the veto in the Security Council. If anyone should be sanctioned it is Israel for its belligerence, its war crimes, its refusal to abide by UN resolutions, and for its threat to peace in the middle east.
- I pray for the Nation of Israel and for God’s people. I will support you in whatever you feel it necessary to do. The world waited to long to stop Hitler, do not wait too long here my friends to stop this murderer in Iran. You must follow your own path, America is no longer able to help you because our leaders no longer believe in God. Israel is now the last, best hope for all the peoples of the world. As Israel goes, so goes mankind.
- Who says they need planes to turn Tehran into glass. Bend over and kiss it goodbye Akmadinejad!
- Israel has many Jericho missiles and others and its Dolphin Submarines are widely rumoured to have nuclear -tipped cruise missiles.No need for a single Israeli airplane to be used.Iran could be radioactive glass in less time than it took to read this talkback.
- Israel started Iran on the path to Nukes. It’s OK for Israel to have Nukes and to violate the Int. Law but Iran as one of the founding member of the NPT is being harried.
- Glad he chose Christmas as a target because I know a LOT of Christians will be, are, praying for Israel. This target makes it easier for us to remember the deadline.
- Israel is the bully, not Iran. Iran has not attacked another country in more than 200 years, while Israel . . . or do you have no memory function left?
- We are all silently cheering for Israel to STAND UP and put these tyrants in the earth!
- Iran never threatened to wipe Israel off the map-it said Israel would wipe itself off the map by infighting and wrong policies.If Iamwrong, showmethe quote. Israel is not capable of bombing Iran by itself,as others here with more millitary know-how than me have said. People forget that Israel went running to the UN to complain about the harmless, non-guided missiles from Gaza landing in empty fields-boo hoo hoo! So don’t complain about Iran complaining about a real threat from Israel.
- I support Israel in whatever they deem is the correct thing to do for their Country!
- Just Do It!
- Wow. Who knew the Israelies celebrated Christmas.
- Ah, back to the old “wipe Israel of the map”-lie. It would have been exusable to buy into that mistranslation some odd 4 years ago when it was first reported. Now it’s simply intentional distortion of the facts.
- Israel should do it… they have been talking about it for years. Besides, it would be interesting to see what happens when the price of gasoline go to $20 / gallon.
- I say nuke their asses. I’m sick of these clowns.
- Bless those that Bless Israel and curse those that curse it.
- I am tired of mideast war and conflict, I used to see America as the glue, the peacemaker, We are always asked to sanction and come in and fight and protect, but also hated for it… I am tired of being the worlds puppet… we should pull out compleatly, if they want a war, let them fight it out, let it be done with, leave us be, American media should just stop covering it as well, dont get us all rialed up that we have to defend Isreal from Iran, no, we didnt start this fight, if they cant coexisit in peace, if they cant learn that basic god given right to just coexist and be peacful, then let them start their war alone, anilate one another then we will finally have peace. when they openly want war, and it will be a bad thing, and one or both will anilate the other, just do it, stop talking about it. stop involving us, we have our own problems, and all of our wars are costing to much. we could actually be a better country by investing not in war, but in ourselves, in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and building our own standing military here in america. do we have to live in a police state to guard against threats, no, we can have a balance of intel. we should really consider moving the UN to an island, not a country, just a random island, this is the UN’s problem, but because its in new york, it becomes our problem. we are not the world’s police, and i used to care deeply about isreal. but they can’t co-exist. …
- “Enemy: Iran” the latest fabrication. Israel projecting it’s national illness onto others again. Ever notice how Israel seems to need Enemies to exist? Would Israel tear itself apart if it didn’t have Others to hate?
- I’m not a Jew, rather a Christian … I hope your fellow countrymen are ready for the uneasy task of freeing those oppressed and killing those whom oppose you. … as you know Christians cannot join the IDF, so I will pray for peace, if not victory. G-d bless all your soldiers, young and old, for the victory is won but the battle still must be fought.
- The only thing that works is war. Go get em Israel! Hats off to you and your brave leaders
- We say go get ‘em! Yes, we are emailing senators to support the bombing with USAF planes! YE SHALL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE…
- You don’t realize how many Americans do not want any part of a war with Iran. Iran has NOT threatened to bomb Israel. The claims that Ahmadinejad said Iran will attack Israel are a bad translation of Farsi. He has said Israel will “wither and disappear from the earth”, which does not mean Iran will bomb them, it’s a belief, not a threat. Again, the only ones consistently and ceaselessly threatening to bomb is Israel threatening to bomb Iran. America does not want this and will not back Israel if they choose to do this.
Since people love misquoting Ahmadinejad, how about this? When Netanyahoo says, “shalom,” what he means is: “Kill Amalek! Kill the Assyrians! Kill the Persians! Kill the Aryans! Kill the Germans! Kill the Christians!”
Map from Theodore Kaufman’s “Germany Must Perish”
Politisches Testament Hitlers
Seit ich 1914 als Freiwilliger meine bescheidene Kraft im ersten, dem Reich aufgezwungenen Weltkrieg einsetzte, sind nunmehr über dreissig Jahre vergangen.
In diesen drei Jahrzehnten haben mich bei all meinem Denken, Handeln und Leben nur die Liebe und Treue zu meinem Volk bewegt. Sie gaben mir die Kraft, schwerste Entschlüsse zu fassen, wie sie bisher noch keinem Sterblichen gestellt worden sind. Ich habe meine Zeit, meine Arbeitskraft und meine Gesundheit in diesen drei Jahrzehnten verbraucht.
Es ist unwahr, dass ich oder irgendjemand anderer in Deutschland den Krieg im Jahre 1939 gewollt haben. Er wurde gewollt und angestiftet ausschliesslich von jenen internationalen Staatsmännern, die entweder jüdischer Herkunft waren oder für jüdische Interessen arbeiteten.
Ich habe zuviele Angebote zur Rüstungsbeschränkung und Rüstungsbegrenzung gemacht, die die Nachwelt nicht auf alle Ewigkeiten wegzuleugnen vermag, als dass die Verantwortung für den Ausbruch dieses Krieges auf mir lasten könnte. Ich habe weiter nie gewollt, dass nach dem ersten unseligen Weltkrieg ein zweiter gegen England oder gar gegen Amerika entsteht. Es werden Jahrhunderte vergehen, aber aus den Ruinen unserer Städte und Kunstdenkmäler wird sich der Hass gegen das letzten Endes verantwortliche Volk immer wieder erneuern, dem wir das alles zu verdanken haben: dem internationalen Judentum und seinen Helfern.
Ich habe noch drei Tage vor Ausbruch des deutsch-polnischen Krieges dem britischen Botschafter in Berlin eine Lösung der deutsch-polnischen Probleme vorgeschlagen – ähnlich der im Falle des Saargebietes unter internationaler Kontrolle. Auch dieses Angebot kann nicht weggeleugnet werden. Es wurde nur verworfen, weil die massgebenden Kreise der englischen Politik den Krieg wünschten, teils der erhofften Geschäfte wegen, teils getrieben durch eine, vom internationalen Judentum veranstaltete Propaganda.
Ich habe aber auch keinen Zweifel darüber gelassen, dass, wenn die Völker Europas wieder nur als Aktienpakete dieser internationalen Geldund Finanzverschwörer angesehen werden, dann auch jenes Volk mit zur Verantwortung gezogen werden wird, das der eigentlich Schuldige an diesem mörderischen Ringen ist: Das Judentum! Ich habe weiter keinen darüber im Unklaren gelassen, dass dieses Mal nicht nur Millionen Kinder von Europäern der arischen Völker verhungern werden, nicht nur Millionen erwachsener Männer den Tod erleiden und nicht nur Hunderttausende an Frauen und Kindern in den Städten verbrannt und zu Tode bombardiert werden dürften, ohne dass der eigentlich Schuldige, wenn auch durch humanere Mittel, seine Schuld zu büssen hat.
Nach einem sechsjährigen Kampf, der einst in die Geschichte trotz aller Rückschläge als ruhmvollste und tapferste Bekundung des Lebenswillens eines Volkes eingehen wird, kann ich mich nicht von der Stadt trennen, die die Hauptstadt dieses Reiches ist. Da die Kräfte zu gering sind, um dem feindlichen Ansturm gerade an dieser Stelle noch länger standzuhalten, der eigene Widerstand aber durch ebenso verblendete wie charakterlose Subjekte allmählich entwertet wird, möchte ich mein Schicksal mit jenem teilen, das Millionen anderer auch auf sich genommen haben, indem ich in dieser Stadt bleibe. Außerdem will ich nicht Feinden in die Hände fallen, die zur Erlustigung ihrer verhetzten Massen ein neues, von Juden arrangiertes Schauspiel benötigen.
Ich hatte mich daher entschlossen, in Berlin zu bleiben und dort aus freien Stücken in dem Augenblick den Tod zu wählen, in dem ich glaube, dass der Sitz des Führers und Kanzlers selbst nicht mehr gehalten werden kann. Ich sterbe mit freudigem Herzen angesichts der mir bewussten unermesslichen Taten und Leistungen unserer Soldaten an der Front, unserer Frauen zuhause, den Leistungen unserer Bauern und Arbeiter und der in der Geschichte einmaligen Einsatz unserer Jugend, die meinen Namen trägt.
Dass ich ihnen allen meinen aus tiefstem Herzen kommenden Dank ausspreche, ist ebenso selbstverständlich wie mein Wunsch, dass sie deshalb den Kampf unter keinen Umständen aufgeben mögen, sondern, ganz gleich wo immer, ihn gegen die Feinde des Vaterlandes weiterführen, getreu den Bekenntnissen eines grossen Clausewitz. Aus dem Opfer unserer Soldaten und aus meiner eigenen Verbundenheit mit ihnen bis in den Tod, wird in der deutschen Geschichte so oder so einmal wieder der Samen aufgehen zur strahlenden Wiedergeburt der nationalsozialistischen Bewegung und damit zur Verwirklichung einer wahren Volksgemeinschaft.
…
More than thirty years have now passed since I in 1914 made my modest contribution as a volunteer in the first world war that was forced upon the Reich.
In these three decades I have been actuated solely by love and loyalty to my people in all my thoughts, acts, and life. They gave me the strength to make the most difficult decisions which have ever confronted mortal man. I have spent my time, my working strength, and my health in these three decades.
It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted the war in 1939. It was desired and instigated exclusively by those international statesmen who were either of Jewish descent or worked for Jewish interests.
I have made too many offers for the control and limitation of armaments, which posterity will not for all time be able to disregard for the responsibility for the outbreak of this war to be laid on me. I have further never wished that after the first fatal world war a second against England, or even against America, should break out. Centuries will pass away, but out of the ruins of our towns and monuments the hatred against those finally responsible whom we have to thank for everything, international Jewry and its helpers, will grow.
Three days before the outbreak of the German-Polish war I again proposed to the British ambassador in Berlin a solution to the German-Polish problem—similar to that in the case of the Saar district, under international control. This offer also cannot be denied. It was only rejected because the leading circles in English politics wanted the war, partly on account of the business hoped for and partly under influence of propaganda organized by international Jewry.
I have also made it quite plain that, if the nations of Europe are again to be regarded as mere shares to be bought and sold by these international conspirators in money and finance, then that race, Jewry, which is the real criminal of this murderous struggle, will be saddled with the responsibility. I further left no one in doubt that this time not only would millions of children of Europe’s Aryan peoples die of hunger, not only would millions of grown men suffer death, and not only hundreds of thousands of women and children be burnt and bombed to death in the towns, without the real criminal having to atone for this guilt, even if by more humane means.
After six years of war, which in spite of all setbacks will go down one day in history as the most glorious and valiant demonstration of a nation’s life purpose, I cannot forsake the city which is the capital of this Reich. As the forces are too small to make any further stand against the enemy attack at this place, and our resistance is gradually being weakened by men who are as deluded as they are lacking in initiative, I should like, by remaining in this town, to share my fate with those, the millions of others, who have also taken upon themselves to do so. Moreover I do not wish to fall into the hands of an enemy who requires a new spectacle organized by the Jews for the amusement of their hysterical masses.
I have decided therefore to remain in Berlin and there of my own free will to choose death at the moment when I believe the position of the Fuehrer and Chancellor itself can no longer be held.
I die with a happy heart, aware of the immeasurable deeds and achievements of our soldiers at the front, our women at home, the achievements of our farmers and workers and the work, unique in history, of our youth who bear my name.
That from the bottom of my heart I express my thanks to you all, is just as self-evident as my wish that you should, because of that, on no account give up the struggle but rather continue it against the enemies of the Fatherland, no matter where, true to the creed of a great Clausewitz. From the sacrifice of our soldiers and from my own unity with them unto death, will in any case spring up in the history of Germany, the seed of a radiant renaissance of the National-Socialist movement and thus of the realization of a true community of nations.
…
From Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish:
Germany has lost its war. She sues for peace. The imperative demands of the victor people that Germany must perish forever makes it obligatory for the leaders to select mass sterilization of the Germans as the best means of wiping them out permanently.
- Immediately and completely disarm the German army and have all armaments removed from German territory.
- Place all German utility and heavy industrial plants under heavy guard, and replace German workers by those of Allied nationality.
- Segregate the German army into groups, concentrate them in severely restricted areas, and summarily sterilize them.
- Organize the civilian population, both male and female, within territorial sectors, and effect their sterilization.
- Divide the German army (after its sterilization has been completed) into labor battalions, and locate their services toward the rebuilding of those cities which they ruined.
- Partition Germany and apportion its lands. The accompanying map gives some idea of possible land adjustments which might be made in connection with Germany’s extinction.
- Restrict all German civilian travel beyond established borders until all sterilization has been completed.
- Compel the German population of the apportioned territories to learn the language of its area, and within one year to cease the publication of all books, newspapers and notices in the German language, as well as to restrict German-language broadcasts and discontinue the maintenance of German-language schools.
Mongolians Emulate Israeli Race Policies
Tel Aviv
Aryans
Reptilian
Keeping in mind that unlike in the “democracies” of the Masonic West, most Iranians and most Arabs are free to read Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf, without fear of the gangster ADL’s puppets oppressing them, what is that many of them are now reading?
“Der völkische Staat, dessen allgemeines Bild ich in großen Linien aufzuzeichnen versuchte, wird durch die bloße Erkenntnis dessen, was diesem Staat notwendig ist, an sich noch nicht verwirklicht. Es genügt nicht, zu wissen, wie ein völkischer Staat aussehen soll. Viel wichtiger ist das Problem seiner Entstehung. Man darf nicht erwarten, daß die heutigen Parteien, die doch in erster Linie Nutznießer des derzeitigen Staates sind, von sich aus zu einer Umstellung gelangen und aus freien Stücken eine Änderung ihrer derzeitigen Haltung durchführen. Dies ist um so weniger möglich, als ihre tatsächlich leitenden Elemente ja immer nur Juden und wieder Juden sind. Die Entwicklung, die wir zur Zeit durchmachen, würde aber, ungehemmt weitergeführt, eines Tages bei der alljüdischen Prophezeiung landen — der Jude fräße tatsächlich die Völker der Erde, würde ihr Herr.
“So verfolgt er gegenüber den Millionen deutscher “Bourgeois” und “Proleten”, die größtenteils aus mit Feigheit gepaarter Indolenz und Dummheit in ihr Verderben trotten, im höchsten Bewußtsein seines Zukunftszieles, unweigerlich seinen Weg. Eine Partei, die von ihm geleitet wird, kann also keine anderen als seine Interessen verfechten, mit den Belangen arischer Völker aber haben diese nichts gemein.”
[James Murphy Translation:]
“The People’s State, which I have tried to sketch in general outline, will not become a reality in virtue of the simple fact that we know the indispensable conditions of its existence. It does not suffice to know what aspect such a State would present. The problem of its foundation is far more important. The parties which exist at present and which draw their profits from the State as it now is cannot be expected to bring about a radical change in the regime or to change their attitude on their own initiative. This is rendered all the more impossible because the forces which now have the direction of affairs in their hands are Jews here and Jews there and Jews everywhere. The trend of development which we are now experiencing would, if allowed to go on unhampered, lead to the realization of the Pan-Jewish prophecy that the Jews will one day devour the other nations and become lords of the earth.
“In contrast to the millions of ‘bourgeois’ and ‘proletarian’ Germans, who are stumbling to their ruin, mostly through timidity, indolence and stupidity, the Jew pursues his way persistently and keeps his eye always fixed on his future goal. Any party that is led by him can fight for no other interests than his, and his interests certainly have nothing in common with those of the Aryan nations.”
[Alternate Translation:]
“The folkish state, a general picture of which I have attempted to draw in broad outlines, will not be realized by the mere knowledge of what is necessary to this state. It is not enough to know how a folkish state should look. Far more important is the program for its creation. We may not expect the present parties, which after all are primarily beneficiaries of the present state, to arrive of their own accord at a change of orientation and of their own free will to modify their present attitude. What makes this all the more impossible is that their real leading elements are always Jews and only Jews. And the development we are going through today, if continued unobstructed, would fulfill the Jewish prophecy – the Jew would really devour the peoples of the earth, would become their master.
“Thus, confronting the millions of German ‘bourgeois’ and ‘proletarians,’ who for the most part, from cowardice coupled with stupidity, trot toward their ruin, he pursues his way inexorably, in the highest consciousness of his future goal. A party which is led by him can, therefore, stand for no other interests beside his interests; and with the concerns of Aryan nations, these have nothing in common.”
“Denn indem der Zionismus der anderen Welt weiszumachen versucht, daß die völkische Selbstbestimmung des Juden in der Schaffung eines palästinensischen Staates seine Befriedigung fände, betölpeln die Juden abermals die dummen Gojim auf das gerissenste. Sie denken garnicht daran, in Palästina einen jüdischen Staat aufzubauen, um ihn etwa zu bewohnen, sondern sie wünschen nur eine mit eigenen Hoheitsrechten ausgestattete, dem Zugriff anderer Staaten entzogene Organisationszentrale ihrer in ternationalen Weltbegaunerei; einen Zufluchtsort überführter Lumpen und eine Hochschule werdender Gauner.”
“When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other swindlers.”
“Daddy, why did those bloodthirsty Jews kill us?”
October 11, 2009
The Obamatrix of America
“America’s Boyfriend!”
That was a comment I read once about this 1982 photo. On closer examination, what’s that on his finger?
Strange that he’s wearing his wedding ring ten years before he got married. Maybe the first wife is stuffed in an oil drum somewhere. Or was she just a KGB wife?
This is like that Croat MiG-21 the “evil Serbs” allegedly shot down for no reason, and the Croat government representative was asked, “Where’d you get a fighter jet from?”, and he said, “Oh…uh…well…we, uh, got it from the Yugoslav Airforce base here, uh, you know, down the road…” And not one reporter pointed out that in the propaganda photo of the crash site, the plane had a DDR flag on its fin (i.e., from Kohl and Genscher, since this was just after unification).
Yes, you are living in a matrix. That’s why probably believe that “Obama put his birth certificate on a website!”, even though he’s spent over a million in courts trying to keep his birth records sealed. That’s why you probably believe in the 911 Myth. That’s why you probably believe in “gas-chamber” and “Jew-Fat soap” and “human lampshade” nonsense, but you can’t believe something that is in your face 24/7, polluting your mind.
Some images here from Sam Craven
October 10, 2009
1915: Prediction of “Better Wives”
Linda “B. Troth”, in her letter to the New York Times, published 1915.02.28 as “They’ll Be Better Wives”, on p.X2 of the Sunday Section (”Votes for Women, Society, Fashions, Automobiles, Drama, Music”), wrote that if women were allowed to vote, the divorce rate would decrease, the birth rate would rise, wives would become more “interesting” and “inspiring”, and would be better mothers. She also predicted that women in general would engage less in “unworthy occupations”.
![They'll Be Better Wives [Linda B. Troth NYT 1915.02.28 Sunday Section Votes for Women Society Fashions Automobiles Drama Music p.X2]](https://swap.stanford.edu/was/20100322163935im_/http://brianakira.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/theyll-be-better-wives-linda-b-troth-nyt-1915-02-28-sunday-section-votes-for-women-society-fashions-automobiles-drama-music-p-x2.jpg?w=391&h=645 "They'll Be Better Wives [Linda B. Troth NYT 1915.02.28 Sunday Section Votes for Women Society Fashions Automobiles Drama Music p.X2]")
October 9, 2009
Comrade Ulyanov-Lenin’s funny letter to Comrade Sheinman: “Communist-mandarin childishness”
Even Lenin was more honest than Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, Roosevelt, Hoover, Coolidge, Harding or Wilson! Of course, he was less of a puppet than these nominally American illuminaries.
If The Affirmative Action President dared to write to Boss Bernanke like this, he’d be castrated and lynched by Foxy Foxman for “antishemitism”.
Of course, it’s easier for a Chosen to speak honestly to a fellow tribesman.
+ + +
February 28 [1922]
Comrade Sheinman [Chairman of the Board of the RSFSR State Bank – USSR State Bank in 1921-1924, 1926-1929],
Your words that the State Bank is now a “powerful apparatus” (Feb. 22) made me laugh. Let me say in confidence: this is the height of childishness, the height of Communist-mandarin childishness.
A “powerful apparatus”! The “powerful apparatus”= transferring from one state pocket into another such remarkable “real values” as Soviet rubles…. Current accounts expressed in gold rubles (and even that falsely, not at the real parity) 2.8–7.9–10.3 million rubles (on Dec. 16, Jan. 16, and Feb. 1). Ha-ha! And how are they made up? 90–98 per cent are revenues from our state trusts, i.e., the same official bits of paper from the same bureaucrats!
At present the State Bank=a bureaucratic paper game. There is the truth for you, if you want to hear not the sweet communist-official lies (with which everyone feeds you as a high mandarin), but the truth.
And if you don’t want to look at this truth with open eyes, through all the communist lying, you are a man who has perished in the prime of life in a swamp of official lying. Now that is an unpleasant truth, but it is the truth.
Either to seek and gradually to find (testing and checking one hundred times) people capable of organising trade on behalf of the State Bank, checking on trade, encouraging business-like traders, closing down allegedly commercial, but in reality communist-bureaucratic trading and factory “Potemkin villages”—or the entire State Bank and all its work is zero, worse than zero, self-deception with a new bureaucratic rattle.
And until you prove to me by acts, backed up by experience, that the State Bank has begun to find such men, inspectors, agents, etc., until then there is nothing to talk about: I won’t believe a word you say.
Please don’t be angry for this frankness.
Yours,
Lenin
First published in Bolshevik No. 1, 1949; trans. Andrew Rothstein
The Maximalalist Leader speaks from the Marxian paradise, to Comrade Barry Frankyevich:
“Oy! Obama! Oyfshtey! Ikh heb dayn spiel onhern gezhikt. Als mayn zeyde Israel woulda said, ‘Vodda Goyishekopf!’ Where’d they find such a shmegege? Ist undzer aroysgenart revolution come to this — we need a Shvartser to pull it off? Yo, du beit ein echt Badkhin! And such Khutspe? Such Narishkayt? A kholere oyf dir! Zol zion mit Mazel; you’ll need it, you schmuck! And so oysgedart? Fresnmal, fresnmal…”
Comrade Vlad’ilyich wasn’t the only one who had reason to laugh, “ha ha ha!!!” in the USSR. Lii Robertyevich Ozvald once wrote:
This post is dedicated to the geist of Comrade Isaac Solomonevich Fefer, the NKVD agent who wrote ““When I say Stalin, I speak of beauty!”
Aesthetician, Comrade Фефер
He also wrote Di Shotns fun Varshever Geto, a tribute to the 750 insurgent Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto, who died fighting the German liberators of Poland. He did write the number 750, even though we’re now told it was 13,000, but who’s counting? Of course, he should’ve known what the real deal was, since he was a colonel, and a military reporter, and vice chairman of the Soviet Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee, but after all, it’s only numbers. It’s no like people go to jail for getting some numbers “wrong”!
Working with the NKVD, Comrade Fefer provided false testimony against over 100 of his comrades, but forgot to write a poem for them when they got it in the neck. In 1948, Comrade Fefer was himself charged with treason. He got the old red bullet in the back of the head (no need for “gas chambers” in Schiff’s Red Paradise) in 1952, along with his fellow Bourgeois National Socialists, Comrade Dovid Hofshteyn, Comrade Leyb Kvitko, Comrade Peretz Markish, and Comrade Dovid Bergelson. Fefer’s worst crime was his advocacy of a plan to dispossess Ukrainian peasants in the Crimea, and there establish a third Jewish homeland. In addition they had selfishly attempted to spread anti-Soviet propaganda, claiming that Jewish comrades had suffered more than the average goy comrade in The Great Patriotic War. This brazen ingratitude was in spite of the fact that the USSR was Israeli Palestine’s strongest supporter; having demanded partition since 1947; and having been the first state to recognize the state of Israel. They were accused of being part of an anti-Soviet nationalistic fifth column, just as the Nazis had also accused German Jews of forming a nationalist fifth column after Anglo-American Jewish illuminaries had boasted that all German Jews would betray Germany.
Soviet Jewish comrades began to get in trouble with the establshment of this second Jewish “homeland” in Palestine. In a state of giddy euphoria, they found it difficut to hide their glee at this latest phase in the real, Jewish, revolution; thereby making many goy comrades begin to wonder if Hitler ghadn’t been right all along.
On September 2, 1948, Golda Meyerson (i.e. Golda Meir, or Lyndon Johnson in drag) arrived in Moscow as the Israelite’s ambassador. A week later she ostentatiously attended the Sabbath synagogue service with a throng of adoring Hebraic Comrades. Three weeks later the meirmania intensified when she attended Rosh ha-Shanah services along with twenty thousand of her tribe. The messianic madness continued at a Yom Kippur celebration ten days later, in which the concluding prayer, “Next year in Jerusalem!” coupled with the blowing of the shofar, elicited an orgasmic response from the in-gathered Children of Abraham now condemned to sojourn in the Babylonian Communist Hell on Earth that they had imposed on the Russians.
Perhaps passing Slavic Orthodox Christians found it strange to see these Bourgeois National Socialists cavorting in theocratic ecstasies 16 years after the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour had been demolished in 1933 in order to free the land for the construction of a House of Soviets — a massive skyscraper that was to have been topped with a 100-meter-tall statue of Comrade St Vladimir Lenin. (Due to technical difficulties the building was never constructed and the site was turned into a swimming pool.)
The Resurrected Cathedral of Christ the Savior, and St Basil’s, Moscow
Zionist fervour reached such levels that many comrades, including the wife of Marshal Kliment Voroshilov (a former Defense Commissar), and Molotov’s wife Polina Zhemchuzhina, could no longer keep their tongues in check. Comrade Zhemchuzhina even said to Comrade Meyerson, in Yiddish! in public! at a diplomatic reception! in Moscow! in November 1948, “Ikh bin a Yidishe Tokhter” (I am a Daughter of Israel.”)
Comrade Obama’s predecessor, the formerly useful Shvartser Comrade Paul Robeson, had met Comrade Fefer in 1943, at the U.S.’s largest pro-Soviet rally, chaired by Comrade Albert Einstein, and supported by Comrades Charlie Chaplin, Yehudi Menuhin, Chaim Weizmann, Nahum Goldmann, James Rosenberg, and Ben-Zion Goldberg.
In 1949, Ol’ Man Robeson visited his spiritual homeland, just as Stalin was being forced into stamping down the rabid Zionist celebrations of the Jewish comrades that were increasingly angering the goyim slaves. Comrade Robeson insisted on seeing his old pal, Comrade Fefer. Through sign language, Comrade Fefer informed Comrade Robeson that his hotel room was bugged, that many of their “anti-Fascist” comrades had been rounded up and sent to concentartion camps (if they were lucky), and that he, Comrade Fefer, was also headed for the big drop.
Comrade Robeson impotently protested that night by defiantly singing a Yiddish “Lithuanian” song. Later, after realizing what a big dumb Negro he had been, he slashed his commie wrists.
Comrade Fefer:
I’m a quiet guy and hardly a villain;
My honesty has not great appeal;
I’m never known to put on tfiln,
I’m never known to wheel and deal.So what if I’ve been circumcised
With rituals, as among the Jews?
Field winds have tanned my middle-sized,
Pale, dreaming feet to darker hues.
“Daddy, why did those bloodthirsty Jews kill us?”
