Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 17, 2010

The Way to Argue About Taxes

Doctor Zero, CK MacLeod, and Mark Steyn have all weighed in on the topic of income taxes, and with respect to their exceptional skills in argumentation and communication, I think they’ve all skirted the important issue.  There is an especially useful way to discuss income taxes – and taxes in general – and it’s to make these two points:

1.  Virtually all the tax-induced ills we suffer today were ushered in with the percentage-based, payroll-deducted income tax.

2.  What we pay for the cost of government – all taxes and regulation – is putting a substantial bite on our standard of living and economic prospects today.

The percentage-based income tax has been by far the greatest accelerator of big government in the United States. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 14, 2010

Beneficiary Limbo

Those of us who are covered by TRICARE insurance – military retirees and military family members – are in a holding pattern this week, along with Medicare beneficiaries.  The provisions of the 1997 Balanced Budget Act require a dramatic, 21.3% cut to physician reimbursements this year by both Medicare and TRICARE, whose policies generally proceed in lockstep (with changes implemented to TRICARE about a month after they are implemented for Medicare).  The cut was originally to take effect on 1 March, but Congress postponed it to 1 April.  Technically, the cut has taken effect for Medicare, but the program is waiting to process new claims to see if Congress will, in fact, override the automatic cuts as it has done in the past.

Jim Bunning and Tom Coburn have affected the progress of related legislation in the Senate, with their “holds” on it to require that Congress’ various routine authorizations – which include this on along with renewal of unemployment benefits – be paid for.  So not only are we all in limbo – patients, doctors, hospitals – but we are being besieged with requests for us to contact our Congressional representatives and make our concerns known.

This development comes at a time when virtually all 50 of the states have made significant cuts to Medicaid reimbursements. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 10, 2010

Kaczynski’s Date with History

The tragic 10 April plane crash in which Polish President Lech Kaczynski and 96 other people died amplifies a sense that the march of history is accelerating and its direction is unclear. There is no evidence of foul play and no reason to suspect any.  But how odd that Kaczynski died during a trip to Russia to commemorate the Katyn Forest massacre of 70 years ago.  The irony is deepened by the fact that Vladimir Putin participated in a separate commemoration ceremony on 7 April with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, marking the first time Russia has implicitly accepted responsibility for the massacre.

Lech Kaczynski told Fox News in September that it was an “unfortunate coincidence” when Barack Obama announced he was abandoning the Bush missile defense plan on 17 September, the day the Soviet Union invaded Poland in 1939.  That coincidence also fell on a 70th anniversary.  It’s almost – if we believed in cosmic omens – as if the dead hand of World War II were reaching out to shake us and wake us up.

The loss of Kaczynski will make a difference to the face of politics in Europe. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 9, 2010

Adieu, Kyrgyzstan

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty has a good article today on the – shock, shock – “Russia connection” to this week’s uprising in Kyrgyzstan. An icky aspect of this tale is that the US is widely perceived to have been bolstering the cartoonishly corrupt regime of ousted president Kurmanbek Bakiev, by paying him big bucks to lease the air base at Manas for support to NATO operations in Afghanistan.

Bakiev, who was approved by Moscow when he seized power in 2005, has been steadily disappointing Russians ever since.  Moscow gave him a long leash when it came to Kyrgyz debt and the inflow of much-needed natural gas, electric power, and infrastructure investment; but everyone has known Bakiev was pocketing pretty much anything in Kyrgyzstan that walked and talked like a commercial profit, and skinning the country’s people and independent businesses to service debt.

Still, he was Moscow’s S.O.B., Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 9, 2010

Israeli Scientists: Latest Victims of Smart Power?

Everyone has picked up on this one. Roger Simon at Pajamas, Joshuapundit, Allahpundit at Hot Air:  according to the Hebrew-language news outlet NRG/Ma’ariv, Israeli scientists have been denied US visas because of their association with the nuclear reactor at Dimona.  (Pajamas provides an English translation.)

My take on this is a little different from that of others, but bear with me.  In a way – if things are as they appear – I think it reflects even more poorly on the Obama administration than does the most obvious conclusion. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 7, 2010

It Depends on What the Meaning of “Nuclear Posture” Is

I see more of a departure from previous policy in Obama’s new Nuclear Posture Review than Max Boot does. Although the administration isn’t putting theatrical exclamation points on it, Hillary Clinton’s announcement on Tuesday that the new NPR reflects a reordering of priorities is meaningful.  In truth, it’s an understatement.

What Obama is actually doing is changing the nature and purpose of the nuclear posture review, as established by Clinton’s (1994) and Bush’s (2002).  The earlier NPRs were strategy documents about the defense of the U.S. and our allies. Obama’s NPR doesn’t address defense strategy; it merely assumes that a certain number of strategic weapons platforms will be sufficient for any unlikely contingencies in that regard, and concentrates instead on a series of declarations about moving toward a non-nuclear world and discouraging the threats of terrorist nukes and nuclear proliferation.

These are certainly valid threats, but they’re not the threats we maintain a nuclear deterrence posture for. The emphasis on them in an NPR amounts to a substantial repurposing of the review. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 3, 2010

Busy Bombers

I guess what I find interesting here is not so much the activity itself, but the dearth of reporting on it in the US mainstream media.

I bet you didn’t know that the day Moscow announced the breakthrough in negotiations on the New START treaty – 24 March – Russian Tu-95 Bear bombers buzzed Alaska.  The US Air Force scrambled fighter jets to intercept and escort them.

The Russians have been diligent (if selectively so) about reporting their bomber fleet’s activities in the Pacific, but they’re getting no love from the US MSM. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | April 1, 2010

Israel and the West, Geostrategically Speaking

One of the most troubling aspects of Barack Obama’s remarkable treatment of Israel is the strategic shortsightedness of it.  Others have written eloquently of the irresponsibility of Obama’s diplomatic posture: its unprofessional, uncollegial treatment of an ally; its partisan bad faith if the US expects to be respected as a mediator in the region; the signal it sends to other allies about the lack of standing or regard they can expect from this administration.

But the geostrategic implications of Obama’s policy trend require comment as well.  What Obama is doing by treating Israel with such partisan disdain comes perilously close to signaling that as far as the United States is concerned, the secure existence of Israel could very well be up for grabs.  And that one signal, as I argued last year in the series “The Next Phase of World War IV,”* is enough to unleash a frenzied joust for power, influence, and control of the Middle East – a free-for-all that would remake the foundations of global geopolitics in a way we have not seen since 1945. Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | March 25, 2010

Health Care: Yep. It Was All About the 1970s

Most conservatives have been keying on the implication of this New York Times article that Obamacare is, too, all about “redistribution of wealth.”  (You can’t redistribute wealth, but that’s another issue.)  Uh-huh, uh-huh, sure enough.  All about “redistribution” of wealth.

But to me the more interesting aspect of David Leonhardt’s piece is his hardworkingly tendentious reference to how economic inequality has been rising among Americans since the 1970s.  (Remember that:  1970s.) Read More…

Posted by: theoptimisticconservative | March 23, 2010

Artificially Staged with 100% Chance of Demagoguery

It was an unpleasant shock this morning when The Weather Channel – The Weather Channel – broke into its regularly scheduled reporting of, well, “weather,” to take viewers to the Obama signing of the House health care “reform” package.

There is nothing conceivable to make of this programming decision, other than that the TWC executives consider the Obamacare legislation so historic-n-epic that even The Weather Channel, which has no charter to bring viewers such non-weather-related coverage, would be doing its audience a service by getting in on the act.

It’s not like viewers had no other options for watching the ceremony.  Just through my cable service, I get 11 other channels on which the signing ceremony was being broadcast.  Three of them are NBC Universal properties, which TWC is as well, since the 2008 buyout.

Seriously, why was a domestic political signing ceremony being broadcast on The Weather Channel? Read More…

Older Posts »

Categories