- The Experience
- The Programs
- MBA Program
- MSx Program
- PhD Program
- Executive Education
- Stanford Ignite
- Research Fellows Program
- Summer Institute for General Management
- Stanford LEAD Certificate: Corporate Innovation
- Stanford Innovation & Entrepreneurship Certificate
- Executive Program for Nonprofit Leaders
- Executive Program in Social Entrepreneurship
- Executive Program for Education Leaders
- Stanford go.to.market
- Faculty & Research
- Insights
- Alumni
- Events
You are here
What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations.
What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations.
Psychological Science in the Public Interest. October
2005, Vol. 6, Issue 2, Pages 31-55
As the workplace has become increasingly diverse, there has been a tension between the promise and the reality of diversity in team process and performance. This article explores diversity through three primary theoretical perspectives: the similarity-attraction paradigm, self and social categorization, and information processing. The similarity-attraction paradigm was developed to understand dyadic relationships. The self-categorization/social-identity and similarity-attraction approaches both tend to lead to the pessimistic view of diversity in teams. The information-processing approach, by contrast, offers a more optimistic view: that diversity creates an atmosphere for enhancing group performance. The article ends with suggestions for how organizations can learn to create incentives for change within the firm.