@NateSilver538 ತಡೆಹಿಡಿಯಲಾಗಿದೆ

ನೀವು ಖಚಿತವಾಗಿಯೂ ಈ ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡಲು ಬಯಸುವಿರಾ? ಟ್ವೀಟ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೋಡುವುದು @NateSilver538 ಅವರನ್ನು ತಡೆತೆರವುಗೊಳಿಸುವುದಿಲ್ಲ.

  1. My premise is that Romney was reasonable to believe he'd be a better SOS for the country than the alternatives. Not just personal ambition.

  2. Sympathetic to Romney, who's smart enough to know he had an 80% chance of being humiliated. But SOS=high reward. Took some guts & integrity.

  3. Tillerson would be a difficult confirmation for Trump. Lots of Russia hawks on the Sen. Foreign Relations Committee.

  4. Interesting comparing hyperbolic NYT coverage of Comey letter to skeptical coverage of Russia/Trump links:

  5. Do you have experience ... 1. writing/reporting on politics? 2. using data to understand politics? Write for us:

  6. OK, revised list, adding Jerry Moran (KS). That's 12 recently + 3 before election. Counting GOPers only. Not adding Burr, who has waffled.

  7. I count 10 GOP senators who recently endorsed an investigation into Russian hacking + 3 more who did so before election. Anyone I'm missing?

  8. A few of us had that Bolton idea- given Trump's biz negotiating strategy of staking out extreme position to move the compromise set point.

  9. Why? Maybe to make the replacement choice (Bolton?) seem more acceptable by comparison. Or maybe to show his dominance / troll everyone.

  10. ...or to deny that Tillerson had ever been picked the first place (can't trust the lyin' media), which he's sort of already doing.

  11. Usually hate these 12-dimensional chess arguments, but seems possible Trump floated Tillerson expecting to withdraw him later...

  12. I'll put it like this: Clinton would almost certainly be President-elect if the election had been held on Oct. 27 (day before Comey letter).

  13. There's more evidence, too: Late-deciding voters broke strongly against Clinton in swing states, enough to cost her MI/WI/PA.

  14. Comey had a large, measurable impact on the race. Harder to say with Russia/Wikileaks because it was drip-drip-drip.

  15. If you're Trump, what's the rationale for picking Tillerson *other* than the Russia stuff? He's not George C. Marshall, exactly.

  16. ...so as few as 3 Republican defections (e.g. Graham, McCain, Collins) could kill the Tillerson nomination.

  17. It's a challenging conirmation. Would seem easy for almost all Dems to hold the line against "ExxonMobil CEO with Putin ties"...

  18. As an aside, there was much mockery of Trump whenever he campaigned in WI & MI and sometimes also PA. People believed that "blue wall" crap.

ಲೋಡಿಂಗ್ ಸಮಯ ಸ್ವಲ್ಪ ತೆಗೆದುಕೊಳ್ಳುತ್ತಿರುವಂತೆನಿಸುತ್ತದೆ.

Twitter ಸಾಮರ್ಥ್ಯ ಅಧಿಕವಾಗಿರಬಹುದು ಅಥವಾ ಈ ಕ್ಷಣದ ತೊಂದರೆಯನ್ನು ಅನುಭವಿಸುತ್ತಿರಬಹುದು. ಮತ್ತೆ ಪ್ರಯತ್ನಿಸಿ ಅಥವಾ ಇನ್ನಷ್ಟು ಮಾಹಿತಿಗೆ Twitter ಸ್ಥಿತಿ ಗೆ ಭೇಟಿ ನೀಡಿ.

    ಇದನ್ನೂ ಸಹ ನೀವು ಇಷ್ಟಪಡಬಹುದು

    ·